Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:04:01.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty Alleviation, Conflict and Power in Poor Displaced Households: A Study of the Views of Women in Diyarbakır

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Leyla Şen
Leyla Şen*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Bilkent University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

According to official data, urban poverty has been rising in Turkey since the 1990s. Macro-level causes include repetitive economic crises, the implementation of neoliberal policies recommended by international financial organizations, the failure to create employment and the increasing inequality in income distribution. The intensity of poverty in different provinces is related to the specific conditions of a particular region. In the 1990s, there was an influx of internally displaced people (IDPs) into the cities of Southeast Anatolia. The lack of employment opportunities, the state's reluctance to address the problems of IDPs and the IDPs' loss of kinship/community networks contributed to the deterioration of their condition in the new urban setting.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 32 , Spring 2005 , pp. 113 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2005

References

Alpar, İstiklal, and Yener, Samira. Gecekondu Araştırması. Ankara: The Directorate of Social Planning Publication, 1991.Google Scholar
Ayata, Sencer. Kentsel Enformal Sektörde İstihdam ve İs Potansiyelinin Geliştirilmesi: Diyarbakır Alan Araştırması: UNDP, 2002.Google Scholar
Bakar, Zekai, Şen, Leyla, and Üstündağ, Nazan. Karacadağ Köylerinde Sosyal Yapı, Tanm ve Doğal Kaynaklar. Diyarbakır: Sürdürülebilir Kırsal ve Kentsel Kalkınma Derneği, 2002.Google Scholar
Barut, Mehmet. ‘Çocuk ve Kadın Boyutuyla Göçün Sosyolojik Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi.’ In Göç Konferansı. İstanbul: Kırmızı Reklam Yayıncılık, 2004.Google Scholar
Bolak, Hale C.“Marital Power Dynamics: Women Providers and Working-Class Households in Istanbul.” In Cities in the Developing World, edited by Gugler, Josef, 218-32. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Buchmann, Claudia. “Family Structure, Parental Perceptions and Child Labor in Kenya: What Factors Determine Who Is Enrolled in School?” Socio/Forces 78, no. 4 (2000): 1349-78.Google Scholar
Chant, Sylvia. Women and Survival in Mexican Cities. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Çinar, Mine. “Unskilled Urban Migrant Women and Disguised Employment: Home-Workingwomen in Istanbul, Turkey.” World Development 22, no. 3 (1994): 369-80.Google Scholar
Dağ, Rıfat, Göktürk, Atilla, and Türksoy, H. Cengiz, eds. Bölgeiçi Zorunlu Göçten Kaynaklanan Toplumsal Sorunların Diyarbakır Kenti ölçeğinde Arastmlması. Ankara: TMMOB Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
De la Rocha, Mercedes, and Grinspun, Alejandro. “Private Adjustments: Household, Crisis and Work.” In Choices for the Poor. Lessons from National Poverty Strategies, edited by Grinspun, Alejandro: UNDP, 2001.Google Scholar
Erder, Sema. “Köysüz ‘Köylü’ Göçü.” Gärfis, no. 34 (1998): 24–26.Google Scholar
Erder, Sema”Yeni Kentliler ve Kentin Yeni Yoksulları.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 66 (1995): 107-19.Google Scholar
Erman, Tahire, Kalaycioğlu, Sibel, and Tılıç-Rittersberger, Helga. “Money Earning Activities and Empowerment of Rural Migrant Women in the City: The Case of Turkey.” Women's Studies International Forum 25, no. 4 (2002): 395–411.Google Scholar
Ersoy, Melih, and Şengul, H. Tarık. Kente Göç ve Yoksulluk: Diyarbakır örneği. Ankara: ODTÜ Kentsel Politika Planlaması ve Yerel Yönetimler Anabilim Dalı Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Faraç, Mehmet. Töre Kıskacında Kadın. İstanbul: Cünizi Yayıncılık, 2002.Google Scholar
Feldman, Shelley. “Exploring Theories of Patriarchy: A Perspective from Contemporary Bangladesh.” Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26, no. 4 (2001): 1097-127.Google Scholar
Göc-Der, . Göç Edenlerin Sosyo-Ekonomik, Sosyo-Kültürel Durumları, Göçün Ortaya çıkardığı Sorunlar, Askeri Çatışma ve Gerginlik Politikası Sonucu Yasam Alanlannı Terk Eden Göç Mağdurlannın Geri Dönü} Eğilimi Araştırması, İstanbul, 1999-2001.Google Scholar
Gökçe, Birsen, ed. Gecekondularda Ailelerarası Geleneksel Dayanışmanın çağdaş Organizasyonlara Dönüşümü. Ankara: Başbakanlık Kadın ve Sosyal Hizmetler Müsteşarlığı Yayını, 1993.Google Scholar
Göktürk, Atilla. “Zorunlu Göç ve Bir Kent: Diyarbakır.” In II. Ulusal Sosyoloji Kongresi: Toplum ve Göç, 356-67. Ankara: Sosyoloji Derneği Yayın No: 5, 1997.Google Scholar
İlkkaracan, İpek. “Göç, Kadının Ekonomik Konumu ve Karar Mekanizmaları.” İktisat Dergisi, no. 377 (1998): 62–67.Google Scholar
Kalaycioğlu, Sibel, and Helga Tılıç-Rittersberger, . Evimizdeki Gündelikçi Kadınlar. İstanbul: Su Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, Deniz. “Bargaining with Patriarchy.” Gender of Society 2, no. 3 (1998): 274-90.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, DenizCariyeler, Bacılar, Yurttaşlar. İstanbul: Metis, 1997.Google Scholar
Moser, Caroline. “Asset Vulnerability Framework: Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction Strategies.” World Development 26, no. 1 (1998): 1–19.Google Scholar
OECD. DAC Guidelines on Poverty Reduction. Paris, 2001.Google Scholar
Okojie, Christina E.E.“Women in the Rural Economy in Nigeria.” In Women, Work and Gender Relations in Developing Countries: A Global Perspective, edited by Ghorayshi, Parvin and Belanger, Claire, 57-74. Connecticuts. London: Greenwood Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Oktay-Yılmaz, Berrin. “Geleneklerin Ardındaki ölümler: Töre Cinayetleri.” Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 8 (2003): 69–83.Google Scholar
Onat, Ümit. Gecekondu Kadınının Kente Özgü Düşünce ve Davranışlar Geliştirme Süreci. Ankara: Başbakanlık Kadın ve Sosyal Hizmetler Müsteşarlığı Yayınları, 1993.Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Özer, Ahmet. “Güneydoğu'da Kentleşeme(me) Dramı.” Görüş, no. 34 (1998): 36–39.Google Scholar
Rowlands, Jo. Questioning Empowerment: Working with Women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts.” In Persistent Inequalities, edited by Tinker, Irene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Sevgi, Cezmi. Kentleşme Sürecinde izmirve Gecekondular. İzmir: İzmir Konak Belediyesi Kültür Hizmetleri, 1988.Google Scholar
Sirman, Nükhet. “The Constitution of Relations between Strangers in Turkey.” Paper presented at the SSRC the Beirut Conference on Public Spheres, 22-24 October 2004.Google Scholar
Sirman, Nükhet”Friend and Foe? Forging Alliances with Other Women in a Village of Western Ṫurkey.” In Women in Modern Turkish Society: A Reader, edited by Tekeli, Şirin. New Jersey: Zed, 1995.Google Scholar
Şenyapili, Tansi. Gecekondu: Çevre İşçilerin Mekânı. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, 1981.Google Scholar
TKV-GAP. GAP Bölgesinde Kadının Statüsü ve Kalkınma Sürecine Entegrasyonu Araştırması. Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi Bölge Kalkınma İdaresi Başkanlığı, 1994.Google Scholar
TKV. “Unpublished Household-Level Survey among Migrant Families in Diyarbakır.” 1996.Google Scholar
Türkyılmaz, Ahmet, Çay, Abdülhalik, Avşar, Zakir, and Aksoy, Mustafa. Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu'dan Terör Nedeniyle Göçeden Ailelerin Sonınlan. Ankara: Başbakanlık Aile Araştıma Kurumu Başkanlığı Yayınları No 115, 1998.Google Scholar
UN. Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. Patriarchy at Work. Cambridge: Polity, 1986.Google Scholar
White, Jenny B.Money Makes Us Relatives: Women's Labor in Urban Turkey. Texas: University of Texas Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Diane. Factory Daughters: Gender, Household Dynamics and Rural Industrialization in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Yalçin-Heckmann, Lale. “Aşiretli Kadın: Göçer ve Yarı-Göçer Toplumlarda Yeniden Üretim ve Cinsiyet Rolleri.” İn Kadın Bakış Açısından 1980'ler Türkiye'sinde Kadınlar, edited by Tekeli, Şirin, İstanbul:İletişim, 1990.Google Scholar
Yalçin-Heckmann, Lale”Kurdish Tribal Organization and Local Political Processes.” In Turkish State, Turkish Society, edited by Finkel, Andrew and Sirman, Nukhet. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
2002 Yılı Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, 2003.Google Scholar
2003 Yılı Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi. Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, 2004.Google Scholar