Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T10:22:30.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences in glucosinolate patterns and arbuscular mycorrhizal status of glucosinolate-containing plant species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2000

H. VIERHEILIG
Affiliation:
Institut für Phytopathologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Hermann-Rodewald-Str. 9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
R. BENNETT
Affiliation:
Cellular Metabolism and Enzymology Group, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UA, UK
G. KIDDLE
Affiliation:
Biochemistry and Physiology Department, IACR–Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
M. KALDORF
Affiliation:
Institut für Ökologie, Lehrbereich Umweltwissenschaften, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Dornburgerstr. 159, D-07743 Jena, Germany
J. LUDWIG-MÜLLER
Affiliation:
Institut für Botanik, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 22, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Under defined laboratory conditions it was shown that two glucosinolate-containing plant species, Tropaeolum majus and Carica papaya, were colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, whereas it was not possible to detect AM fungal structures in other glucosinolate-containing plants (including several Brassicaceae). Benzylglucosinolate was present in all of the T. majus cultivars and in C. papaya it was the major glucosinolate. 2-Phenylethylglucosinolate was found in most of the non-host plants tested. Its absence in the AM host plants indicates a possible role for the isothiocyanate produced from its myrosinase-catalysed hydrolysis as a general AM inhibitory factor in non-host plants. The results suggest that some of the indole glucosinolates might also be involved in preventing AM formation in some of the species. In all plants tested, both AM hosts and non-hosts, the glucosinolate pattern was altered after inoculation with one of three different AM fungi (Glomus mosseae, Glomus intraradices and Gigaspora rosea), indicating signals between AM fungi and plants even before root colonization. The glucosinolate induction was not specifically dependent on the AM fungus. A time-course study in T. majus showed that glucosinolate induction was present during all stages of mycorrhizal colonization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Trustees of the New Phytologist 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)