Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 December 2017
Commentators regularly note the alleged tension in John 15 between ‘friendship’ and ‘obedience’. This article employs numismatic inscriptional evidence to explore the ΦΙΛ- lexeme and more carefully denote the semantic domains of relevant terminology. This analysis confirms that no such tension exists within the socio-political context in which the Gospel was written. The inclusion of specific political terminology on Roman coins (for example, ΦΙΛΙΑ; ΦΙΛΟΚΑΙΣΑΡ; ΦΙΛΟΚΛΑΥΔΙΟΣ; ΦΙΛΟΡΩΜΑΙΟΣ; ΦΙΛΟΣΕΒΑΣΤΩΝ) was one way in which elite concepts of political friendship, evidenced in Cicero and Seneca, were communicated to the masses. In light of the numismatic evidence, the ΦΙΛ- lexeme can refer not only to the emotional bond of friendship, but also the dimension of obligation.
1 Lindars, B., The Gospel of John (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1982) 281Google Scholar.
2 Bauer, W., Danker, F. W., Arndt, W. F. and Gingrich, F. W., Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999 3) 1058–9Google Scholar.
3 M. P. Theophilos, Numismatics and Greek Lexicography (London: T&T Clark, forthcoming).
4 Kysar, R., John (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1986) 240Google Scholar.
5 All translations are my own.
6 Bultmann, R., The Gospel of John: A Commentary (trans. Murray, G. R. Beasley; Philadelphia: Westminster, 1971) 545Google Scholar.
7 Brown, Raymond E., The Gospel According to John xiii–xxi (New York: Doubleday & Company Inc., 1970) 664Google Scholar.
8 Bultmann, John, 543.
9 Bultmann, John, 543.
10 von Wahlde, U. C., The Gospel and Letters of John, vol. ii (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010) 682Google Scholar.
11 Haenchen, E., John, vol. ii (trans. Funk, R. W. and Busse, U.; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984) 132Google Scholar.
12 Barrett, C. K, The Gospel According to St. John (Cambridge: SPCK, 1978 2) 477Google Scholar.
13 Deissmann, A., Light from the Ancient East: The New Testament Illustrated by Recently Discovered Texts from the Graeco-Roman World (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1927 2; repr. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1978) 383Google Scholar. Several commentators in the late nineteenth century trace the friendship idea to Abraham, see for example Westcott, B. F., The Gospel according to St. John (London: Buttler and Tanner, 1882) 220Google Scholar; cf. Schnackenburg, R., The Gospel according to Saint John, vol. iii (trans. Smith, David and Kon, G. A.; New York: Crossroad, 1982) 109–10Google Scholar, who traces the theme of friendship in Jewish sapiential literature citing examples such as Ecclus 6.5–17.
14 Barrett, John, 477.
15 Carson, D. A., The Gospel according to John (Grand Rapids: InterVarsity, 1991) 533Google Scholar.
16 Carson, John, 533.
17 Carson, John, 533.
18 Carson, John, 522.
19 Michaels, J. R., The Gospel of John (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010) 813Google Scholar.
20 Carter, W., Empire and John (London: T&T Clark, 2008) 278Google Scholar.
21 Deissmann, Light, 383.
22 Braund, D., Rome and the Friendly King: The Character of Client Kingship (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1984)Google Scholar, esp. 105–8.
23 Braund, Rome, 105.
24 The earliest attested use of φιλορώμαιος is that of Ariobarzanes I, king of Cappadoccia from 95 to 63 bce ( Sullivan, R. D., ‘The Dynasty of Cappadocia’, ANRW ii.7.2 (1980) 1125–68Google Scholar). After the advent of the Principate both φιλοκαῖσαρ and φιλοσέβαστος were common titles adopted by client kings. The more specific designations of φιλογερμάνικος (Gaius) [Polemo II of Pontus, IGR iv.145] and φιλοκλαύδιος (Claudius) [Herod of Chalcis] (see Reifenberg, A., Ancient Jewish Coins (Jerusalem: R. Mass, 1947) 23–4Google Scholar), are also attested on coinage. E. Schürer suggests that the adoption of the title would be ‘a natural act of homage to the emperor to whom he owed all his splendor’ ( Schürer, E., The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (175 bc–ad 135) revised Vermes, G. and Millar, F., vol. 1 (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1973)Google Scholar 572).
25 Braund, Rome, 107.
26 Crook, J., Consilium Principis: Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955) 21–30 Google Scholar.
27 Crook, Consilium Principis, 21.
28 Crook, Consilium Principis, 21.
29 Crook, Consilium Principis, 22.
30 Crook, Consilium Principis, 22.
31 Crook, Consilium Principis, 26.
32 van der Horst, P. W., Philo's Flaccus: The First Pogrom (Leiden: Brill, 2003) 128Google Scholar.
33 For a disparaging ancient perspective on Eurycles, see Josephus, A.J. 16.301, 306, 309–10; B.J. 1.513, 518, 526, 530, 532.
34 For further discussion on ‘friend of Caesar’, see Millar, F., The Emperor in the Roman World (London: Duckworth, 1992) 110–22Google Scholar; Horsley, G. H. R., New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity: A Review of the Greek Inscriptions and Published Papyri in 1978 (Sydney: Macquarie University, 1983) 87–9Google Scholar.
35 Malina, B. J. and Rohrbaugh, R. L., Social Science Commentary on the Gospel of John (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998) 236Google Scholar.
36 Burnett, A., Amandry, M. and Ripollès, P. P., Roman Provincial Coinage, vol. i: From the Death of Caesar to the Death of Vitellius (44 bc–ad 69) (London: British Museum, 1992)Google Scholar.
37 ‘Now, when Claudius had taken out of the way all those soldiers whom he suspected, which he did immediately, he published an edict, and therein confirmed that kingdom to Agrippa which Caius had given him, and therein commended the king highly. He also made an addition to it of all that country over which Herod, who was his grandfather, had reigned, that is, Judea and Samaria; and this he restored to him as due to his family. But for Abila of Lysanias, and all that lay at Mount Libanus, he bestowed them upon him, as out of his own territories. He also made a league with this Agrippa, confirmed by oaths, in the middle of the forum, in the city of Rome; he also took away from Antiochus that kingdom which he was possessed of, but gave him a certain part of Cilicia and Commagene; he also set Alexander Lysimachus, the alabarch, at liberty, who had been his old friend, and steward to his mother Antonia, but had been imprisoned by Caius, whose son [Marcus] married Bernice, the daughter of Agrippa. But when Marcus, Alexander's son, was dead, who had married her when she was a virgin, Agrippa gave her in marriage to his brother Herod, and begged for him of Claudius the kingdom of Chalcis. Now, about this time there was a sedition between the Jews and the Greeks, at the city of Alexandria; for, when Caius was dead, the nation of the Jews, which had been very much mortified under the reign of Caius, and reduced to very great distress by the people of Alexandria, recovered itself, and immediately took up their arms to fight for themselves. So Claudius sent an order to the president of Egypt, to quiet that tumult; he also sent an edict, at the request of King Agrippa and King Herod, both to Alexandria and to Syria, whose contents were as follows …’
38 Meshorer, Y., A Treasury of Jewish Coins (Jerusalem: Amphora Books, 2001) 101Google Scholar.
39 Hendin, D., Guide to Biblical Coins (Jerusalem: Amphora, 2010 5) 265Google Scholar.
40 Crook, Consilium Principis, 24.
41 Cf. Philo Leg. ad Gai. 302 where Jewish leaders threatened to refer a matter to Tiberius, whereupon Pilate ‘feared that if they actually sent an embassy they would also expose the rest of his conduct as a governor by stating in full the briberies, the insults, the outrages and wonton injuries, the executions without trial constantly repeated, the ceaseless and repeated cruelty’.
42 Carter, John.
43 Some pertinent examples are Oster, R. E., ‘Numismatic Windows into the Social World of Early Christianity: A Methodological Enquiry’, JBL 101 (1982) 195–223 Google Scholar; idem, ‘“Show me a denarius”: Symbolism of Roman Coinage and Christian Beliefs’, ResQ 28 (1986) 107–15Google Scholar; Kreitzer, L. J., Striking New Images: Roman Imperial Coinage and the New Testament World (JSNTSup 134; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Reiser, M., ‘Numismatik und Neues Testament’, Biblica 81 (2000) 457–88Google Scholar, at 457; Weissenrieder, A. and Wendt, F., ‘He is a god! Acts 28:1–9 in the Light of Iconographical and textual Sources Related to Medicine’, Picturing the New Testament: Studies in Ancient Visual Images (ed. Weissenrieder, A., Wendt, F. and von Gemünden, P.; WUNT ii/193; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005) 127–56Google Scholar; May, D., ‘The Empire Strikes Back: The Mark of the Beast in Revelation’, Review & Expositor 106 (2009) 83–98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘Interpreting Revelation with Roman Coins: A Test Case, Revelation 6:9–11’, Review & Expositor 106 (2009) 445–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Some exceptions are Thielman, F., ‘God's Righteousness as God's Fairness in Romans 1:17: An Ancient Perspective on a Significant Phrase’, JETS 54 (2011) 35–48 Google Scholar; Weima, J. A. D., ‘“Peace and Security” (1 Thess 5.3): Prophetic Warning or Political Propaganda?’, NTS 58 (2012) 331–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Theophilos, M. P., ‘The Numismatic Background of ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡ in Hebrews 1:3’, ABR 64 (2016) 69–80 Google Scholar; idem, ‘Ephesus and the Numismatic Background to “νεωκόρος”’ (Atlanta: SBL, forthcoming); idem, Numismatics and Greek Lexicography (London: T&T Clark, forthcoming).
45 Cf. Aristotle's description of happiness, ‘good birth, plenty of friends, good friends, wealth, good children, plenty of children …’ (Rhet. 1.5.4).
