Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T13:33:41.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpreting This Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

H. G. Wood
Affiliation:
Birmingham

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 263 note 1 Do ‘the three years’ of the parable point to a three-year ministry? Possibly, but it may be a mistake to read so much into a detail.

page 263 note 2 We may compare the description of the siege of Herod's palace, conducted by Menahem, the son of Judas the Galilean, in Josephus, Wars, bk. II, esp. § 436.

page 264 note 1 A parallel to the sentiment of v. 59 might be found in Lincoln's second inaugural: ‘Yet if God wills that it [the Civil War] continue till all the wealth piled by the bondman's 250 years of unrequited toil shall be sunk and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid with another drawn by the sword, as was said 3000 years ago, so still it must be said, The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.’

page 265 note 1 And above these titles [inscribed on stelae warning foreigners not to pass from the court of the Gentiles] was hung a fourth title in the same characters, announcing that Jesus (the) king did not reign (but was) crucified [by the Jews] because he prophesied the destruction of the city and the devastation of the temple (bk. v, pp. 195f.).