No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
St John and the Passion Narratives of St Matthew and St Luke
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Extract
In a previous study in this journal we compared the Passion Narratives of the Fourth Gospel and of Mark, reaching the conclusion that John shows knowledge not of the Gospel according to St Mark, but of a Passion Story which Mark also knew, a narrative included in the B stratum of the Marcan Passion Account as analysed by Principal Vincent Taylor. Recently, Dr Peder Borgen has offered the criticism that we had taken into account only the agreements of John with Mark and had not considered the similarities with Luke and Matthew. The limitation was imposed by the nature of our inquiry at that stage. To widen the scope of our investigation by taking Matthew and Luke into account is the inevitable next step. Far from disproving the hypothesis we were led to advance, the examination of the passages involved tends to confirm it.
- Type
- Short Studies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960
References
page 1 note 1 ‘St John and the Marcan Passion Narrative,’ N. T.S. IV (1958), 215 ff.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 ‘John and the Synoptics in the Passion Narrative,’ N.T.S. V (1959), 249 ff.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Cf. Barrett, C. K., The Gospel According to St John;Google ScholarBultmann, R., Das Johannes.evangelium, ad loc.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Streeter, B. H., The Four Gospels, p. 411.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Op. cit. pp. 411 f.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Op. cit. pp. 247–9.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Morgenthaler, R., Statish des neutestamentlichen Wortschatzes, p. 118.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Op. cit. p. 412.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 In Recherches de Science Religieuse, XXXIX, 1951 (= Mélanges Jules Lebreton). Cf. also Schniewind, J., Die Parallelperikopen bei Lukas und Johannes, which came into the writer's hands too late for use in the preparation of this article.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Behind the Third Gospel, pp. 40–1.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 E.g. Geldenhuys, N., Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, loc. cit. and Barrett, op. cit. p. 363.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Cf. Creed, J. M., The Gospel According to St Luke, p. 267;Google ScholarManson, T. W., The Mission and Message of Fesus, pp. 629 ff.Google Scholar
page 1 note 4 Behind the Third Gospel, pp. 40–1.Google Scholar
page 1 note 5 Cf e.g., Hoskyns, The Fourth Gospel, p. 452; Barrett, op. cit. p. 37.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Cf. e.g., Gilmour, S. M., The Interpreter's Bible, VII, 388–9;Google ScholarLeaney, A. R. C., The Gospel according to Luke, p. 272.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Osty, op. cit. p. 148.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Cf. Major, H. D. A., The Mission and Message of Jesus, p. 178.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Osty, op. cit. p. 149.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Cf. Major, op. cit. p. 181.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 St John and the Synoptic Gospels, p. 64.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Cf. e.g., Plummer, St Luke (I.C.C.), loc. cit.;Google ScholarBalmforth, H., St Luke (Clarendon Bible), loc. cit.;Google ScholarLagrange, M. J., Evanile selon Saint Luc, loc. cit.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Op. cit. p. 523.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Cf. for Luke, Bundy, W. E., Jesus and the First Three Gospels, p. 534 and for John, Barrett, op. cit.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Cf. Osty, op. cit. pp. 151–2.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Cf. Osty, op. cit.Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Op. cit. p. 465.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Cf. Zurhellen, O., Die Heimat des Vierien Evangeliens (Tübingen, 1909), p. 49.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Op. cit. p. 456.Google Scholar
page 1 note 4 Op. cit. pp. 153 ff.;Google Scholarcf. Cladder, H. J., Unsere Evangelien, I (Freiburg, 1919, 179 ff., 192 ff.).Google Scholar
page 1 note 1 Cf. e.g., Streeter, op. cit. p. 202; Taylor, op. cit. pp. 33 ff.Google Scholar
page 1 note 2 Cf. e.g., Creed, op. cit. pp. lxiii f.Google Scholar
page 1 note 3 Op. cit. p. 397.Google Scholar