^{page 224 note 1} According to the Scriptures, p. 35;Google Scholarcf. Dalman, The Words of Jesus, p. 311.Google Scholar

^{page 224 note 2} J.T.S., April 1950, pp. 24–5.Google Scholar

^{page 224 note 3} S.N.T.S. Bulletin III, p. 47.Google Scholar

^{page 225 note 1} The Glory of God and the Tranifiguration of Christ, p. 37.Google Scholar

^{page 225 note 2} Luke abides by the Jewish dogma that, except for a special act of grace, a man cannot endure the sight of God's δόξα. Even Paul was blinded by its light (Acts xxii. II).Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 1} See χρονίзι in Luke xii. 45 = Matt. xxiv. 48. The problem had arisen as early as I Thess. (iv. 1318) and was essentially the same when II Peter was written (iii. 4).Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 2} So, according to Dodd, in xix. 22–27 he transforms a non-eschatological parable into an allegory of the Second Advent (The Parables of the Kingdom, pp. 146–53).Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 3} The Epistle to the Hebrews, chapter ii.Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 4} See Cullmann, O., Christ et le Temps, pp. 113–18, and Le retour du Christ, chapter IV.Google Scholar

^{page 226 note 5} In fact Acts i. 6–11 forms an important part of Cullmann's evidence.Google Scholar