No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Nebraska Documents and Sources
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 May 2020
Extract
If the American states are political laboratories, then Nebraska has performed its share of experiments, the most impressive, as the following bibliography indicates, being the unicameral, nonpartisan legislature. There are other notable features, also worthy of comparative study. For example, the state is just now ending a sixteen-year trial of setting state sales and income tax rates by members of the executive branch rather than by the legislature. The ways in which Nebraskans resolve their grievances with state administrators, manage their water resources, impeach their public officials, and provide their electrical power are also out of the ordinary.
Nebraskans can be unpredictable and the political life of the state continues to bewilder the careful observer. Superficially, it might appear that the turmoil of the early years, from the battles over statehood through the Populist movement, has reached a condition of placidity approaching dullness.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984
References
Moschos, Demitrios, and Katsky, David, “Unicameralism and Bicameralism: History and Tradition,” Boston University Law Review, 45 (1965), 250-70.Google Scholar
“Nebraska: Unicameral Body Legislates Alone and Likes It,” Newsweek, 9 (May 22, 1937), 11–12.Google Scholar
Nebraska Legislative Council, Unicameral Legislatures: A Bibliography, Lincoln: 1948.Google Scholar
Nebraska Legislative Council, Nebraska Blue Book. Lincoln: Published biennally.Google Scholar
Nebraska State Historical Society, John Senning Papers, MS2006, Box 14, S4, F89.Google Scholar
“Nebraska's Unicameral Adjourns: The Session in Retrospect,” State Government, 10 (1937), 131-34.Google Scholar
Nemeth, Sharon, An Idea Becomes Law in Nebraska. Lincoln: League of Women Voters, 1977.Google Scholar
Norris, George, “One Branch Legislature for States Would Improve Results,” New York Times, January 28, 1923.Google Scholar
Norris, George, “The Model Legislature,” Congressional Record, February 27, 1934. Vol. 78, Pt. 3, 3276-80.Google Scholar
Norris, George, “One-House Legislature for More Efficient Legislation,” Literary Digest, 118 (October 13, 1934), 8.Google Scholar
Norris, George, “The One-House Legislature,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 181 (1935), 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, George,“The One-House Legislature,” National Municipal Review, 24 (1935), 87–89, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, George, “Nebraska's One-House Legislative System,” Congressional Record, February 7, 1935. Vol. 79, Pt. 2, 1635-37.Google Scholar
Norris, George, “One House Legislatures? Yes.” Rotarian, 42 (January, 1938), 10–11, 56-57.Google Scholar
Omdahl, Lloyd B., “Drive for Unicameralism Needs National Support,” National Civic Review, 63 (1974), 526-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The One House Legislature,” Greater Cleveland, 17 (1937), 49-52.Google Scholar
“Only 42 Lawmakers Meet in Norris's Single House,” Newsweek, 9 (January 16, 1937), 10.Google Scholar
Orfield, Lester B., “The Unicameral Legislature in Nebraska,” Michigan Law Review, 343 (1935), 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C. Petrus, “The Legislature and the Press,” State Government, 27 (1954), 223-25.Google Scholar
Pound, Merritt B., The State Legislature: Two Houses or One? Athens: University of Georgia, Division of Publications, 1938.Google Scholar
Reilly, Mary, The Standing Committees in the Nebraska Legislature, 1929-1953. MA Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1962.Google Scholar
“Restoring Confidence in the Legislature,” National Municipal Review, 33 (1944), 58-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, William, “Nonpartisan Unicameral — Benefits, Defects, Re-examined,” Nebraska Law Review, 52 (1973), 377–403.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Jack W., “One House for 20 Years,” National Municipal Review, 46 (1957) 338-42, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Jack W., Sittig, Robert, and Welch, Susan, “The Legislature,” In Miewald, Robert (ed.) Nebraska Government and Politics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Rousse, Thomas A., Bicameralism vs. Unicameralism. New York: T. Nelson and Sons, 1937.Google Scholar
Saylor, Galen, The Unicameral Legislature: Its Operation in Nebraska. Teacher's Pamphlet No. 5, Nebraska State Teachers Association. Lincoln, 1937.Google Scholar
Schaffter, Dorothey, The Bicameral System in Practice. Iowa City, IA: State Historical Society of Iowa, 1929.Google Scholar
Senning, Elizabeth, Nebraska's One-House Legislature. Lincoln: Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics, Extension Circular No. 5542, 1937.Google Scholar
Senning, John P., “The One-House Legislature in Nebraska,” Nebraska Law Bulletin, 13 (1935), 341-50.Google Scholar
Senning, John P., “Nebraska Provides for a One-House Legislature,” American Political Science Review, 29 (1935), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senning, John P., The One-House Legislature in Nebraska. Lincoln: Legislative Reference Bureau, 1935.Google Scholar
Senning, John P., “Nebraska's One-House Legislature,” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 18 (1937), 115-25.Google Scholar
Senning, John P., “The First Session of Nebraska's One-House Legislature,” In Aly, Bower (ed.), Unicameral Legislatures, 11th Annual Debate Handbook. Columbia, MO: Lucas Brothers, 1937.Google Scholar
Senning, John P., “Nebraska's Experience in Setting Up A One-House Legislature,” New Mexico Business Review, 6, (1937), 12–20.Google Scholar
Senning, John P., “Nebraska's First Unicameral Legislative Session,” Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 195 (1938), 159-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senning, John P., “One House, Two Sessions,” National Municipal Review, 28 (1939), 843-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senning, John P., “Constitutional Essentials for a Unicameral Legislature,” University of Kansas City Law Review, 11 (1942), 10–15.Google Scholar
Senning, John P., “Unicameralism Passes Test,” National Municipal Review, 33 (1954), 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Should We Adopt the One House Legislature,” Debater's Digest, 11 (September, 1937).Google Scholar
Shuck, Bryle, The One-House Legislature: A Study of Procedural Practices, 1939 Session. MA Thesis, Lincoln, University of Nebraska, 1940.Google Scholar
Shull, Charles W., American Experience with Unicameral Legislatures. Detroit Bureau of Governmental Research, Report No. 147, December, 1937.Google Scholar
Shull, Charles W., The Unicameral Legislature. Detroit: Citizen Research Council of Michigan, 1960.Google Scholar
Shumate, Roger V., “The Nebraska Unicameral Legislature,” Western Political Quarterly, 5 (1952), 504-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Single-House Legislature: Nebraska Adopts the Unicameral Principle by Big Majority,” Greater Cleveland, 10 (1934), 41-42.Google Scholar
Sittig, Robert F., “Unicameralism in Nebraska, 1936-1966,” State Government, 40 (1967), 38–41.Google Scholar
Sittig, Robert F., “Unicameralism and the Nebraska Experience,” Parliamentary Journal, 21 (October, 1980), 38–43.Google Scholar
“Legislative Apportionment in Nebraska,” In Hardy, Leroy, Heslop, Alan, and Anderson, Stuart (eds.), Reapportionment Politics: The History of Redistricting in the 50 States. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981.Google Scholar
Spencer, Richard C., “Unicameralism: Milepost — Not Destination,” University of Kansas City Law Review, II (1942), 16–23.Google Scholar
Spencer, Richard C., “Nebraska Idea is 15 Years Old,” National Municipal Review, 39 (1950), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Richard C., “Highest Score Sheet,” National Municipal Review, 46 (1957), 502-05; 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Richard C., “Nebraska Unicameral Operates Smoothly,” National Civic Review, 50 (1961), 424-25.Google Scholar
Spicer, Erik J., “State Senates: Are They Really Necessary?” State Government, 48 (1975), 156-59.Google Scholar
Srb, Hugo F., Brief Comparison of the Bicameral and Unicameral Legislative Systems and Rules and Laws Governing Their Operation In Nebraska. Lincoln: Nebraska Legislative Council, 1953, 1959.Google Scholar
Srb, Hugo F., “The Unicameral Legislature — A Successful Innovation,” Nebraska Law Review, 40 (1961), 626-33.Google Scholar
Summers, Harrison, Unicameralism in Practice: The Nebraska Legislative System. New York: H.W.Wilson, 1937.Google Scholar
Tax Foundation of Hawaii, One House or Two: The Unicameral-Bicameral Question. Honolulu: The Foundation, 1975.Google Scholar
“Ten Years Test of a One House Legislature,” Greater Cleveland, 19 (March 2, 1944).Google Scholar
Tompkins, Philip K., George W. Norris’ Persuasion in the Campaign for the Unicameral Legislature, MA Thesis, University of Nebraska, 1968.Google Scholar
“Tower on the Plains,” American Bar Association Journal, 55 (1969), 747-48.Google Scholar
Trimble, Bruce, and Stamps, Norman L., The Structure of the Legislature: Bicameralism v. Unicameralism. Jefferson City: Missouri Constitutional Convention of 1943, Committee on Research, 1943.Google Scholar
“Unicameral Legislatures,” in Phelps, Edith (ed.). University Debater's Annual. New York: H.W. Wilson, 1938.Google Scholar
“Unicameral Nebraska,” Economicist, 214 (1965), 892-94.Google Scholar
“Unicameral Results,” Time, 29 (May 17, 1937), 18.Google Scholar
“The Unicameral System of Legislation,” Congressional Digest, 16 (1937), 193-224. University of Nebraska, School of Journalism, Nebraska's Unicameral, (rev. ed.) Lincoln, 1970.Google Scholar
Unruh, Jesse, “One-House Legislature Advocated by Unruh,” National Civic Review, 60 (1971), 253-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, Harry W., Descriptive Analysis of Nebraska's Unicameral. Ph.D. Dissertation, Lawrence, University of Kansas, 1969.Google Scholar
Walch, J. Weston, A Complete Handbook on Unicameral Legislatures. Portland, ME: Platform News Publishing Co., 1937.Google Scholar
Weeks, O. Douglas, Two Legislative Houses or One. Arnold Foundation Studies, Vol. VI, No. 3. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University, 1938.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, “Election to the Legislature: Competition and Turnout,” In Comer, John and Johnson, James (eds.), Nonpartisanship in the Legislative Process: Essays on the Nebraska Legislature. Washington, DC: American University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, “The Impact of Party on Voting Behavior in the Nebraska Legislature,” in Comer, John and Johnson, James (eds.), Nonpartisanship in the Legislative Process: Essays on the Nebraska Legislature. Washington, DC: American University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Bowman, James. “The Nonpartisan Legislature: Does It Affect Political Careers?” National Civic Review, 9 (1972), 451-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan, “Impact of Party on Voting Behavior in a Nonpartisan Legislature,” American Political Science Review, 67 (1973), 854-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Comer, John, “Neb. Legislature Not Well Known,” National Civic Review, 68 (1979), 488-89.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Comer, John, Nebraskans and Their Legislature: Part I, Information, (NASIS Report 1978 #2) Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Bureau of Sociological Research, 1978.Google Scholar
Weser, Robert. “George W. Norris: The Unicameral Legislature and the Progressive Ideal,” Nebraska History, 45 (1965), 309-21.Google Scholar