Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T00:58:14.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women and American Politics "Mainstreaming" at Kent State U.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

Karen Dean
Affiliation:
Kent State University
Charles Warner
Affiliation:
Kent State University
Trudy Steuernagel
Affiliation:
Kent State University

Extract

During the Spring Semester of 1984, we had the opportunity to field test Women in the Judicial Process and Men, Women, and State Violence: Government and the Military, two of the units in the American Political Science Association's project, Citizenship and Change: Women and American Politics. We greeted the experiment with great enthusiasm. Our current undergraduate curriculum includes the course “Women and Politics“; but, like many departments, we have given consideration to “mainstreaming” the contents of this class into other courses. Some of our faculty contend that “Women and Politics” perpetuates the “ghettoization” of such material and that our students would be better served by the abandonment of “Women and Politics” in favor of the integration of its content into our more traditional offerings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fowlkes, Diane L.How Feminist Theory Reconstructs American Government and Politics. Washington, D.C: American Political Science Association, 1983.Google Scholar
Hedblom, Milda K. and Kohfeld, Carol. “An Assessment of the Scholarly Treatment of Women in Political Science Textbooks.“ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 1979.Google Scholar
Wolgast, Elizabeth H.Equality and the Rights of Women. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar