Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T07:26:45.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Richard Strauss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2011

Scott Warfield
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CD Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘TrV’ numbers refer to the chronological order of Strauss's works in Trenner, Franz, Richard Strauss Werkverzeichnis, Veröffentlichungen der Richard Strauss-Gesellschaft München 12 (Munich, 1993)Google Scholar .

2 Two earlier works by Strauss for orchestra, the Violin Concerto op. 8 (TrV 110) and the Horn Concerto op. 11 (TrV 117), technically pre-date the Symphony op. 12 in print, but both were published initially only in piano reductions. Neither was heard with full orchestra until after the symphony.

3 Trenner, Franz, ‘Richard Strauss und die ’Wilde Gung'l”’, Schweizerische Musikzeitung 90 (1950): 403–5Google Scholar .

4 Schuh, Willi, Richard Strauss: A Chronicle of the Early Years 1864–1898, trans. Whittall, Mary (Cambridge, 1982), 4952Google Scholar .

5 See Warfield, Scott, ‘The Genesis of Richard Strauss's Macbeth’ (PhD diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1995)Google Scholar , ‘Appendix B,’ 451–66, for a selective list of performances of Strauss's orchestral works in the years 1884–97. Twenty-nine performances of the symphony can be documented during those years, with at least one in every year.

6 See ibid., 416–21, for two extended reviews (and English translations) of the German premiere in Cologne.

7 See, for instance, Bülow's letters of 25 March 1887, 19 August 1887, 18 January 1888, 13 December 1888, and 8 March 1891, all to Eugen Spitzweg, owner of Aibl Verlag, in which Bülow praises the Symphony in F Minor as superior initially to Strauss's Aus Italien op. 16 (TrV 147), and later to Strauss's first tone poem, Macbeth op. 23 (TrV 163). ( Bülow, Hans von, Briefe und Schriften, ed. Bülow, Marie von, Vol. 8, Höhepunkt und Ende 1886–1894 [Leipzig, 1908], 119 note, 121–2, 181–2, 236 and 332.)Google Scholar

8 Reported by Strauss, himself in his Betrachtungen und Errinerungen (Zürich/Freiburg i.B., 1949), 148Google Scholar . The English translation is from Strauss, Richard, Recollections and Reflections, ed. Schuh, Willi, trans. Lawrence, L.J. (London, 1953), 123–4Google Scholar .

9 See Mar, Norman Del, Richard Strauss (Ithaca, NY, 1986), 1: 226Google Scholar , for one of the more negative descriptive analyses of the symphony. In contrast, a more sympathetic description is given by Theodore Bloomfield, a conductor who has led performances of the symphony, in his article A Case of Neglect: Richard Strauss' Symphony in F minor’, Music and Musicians 22 (Feb. 1974): 24–9Google Scholar .