Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:45:37.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David A. Peterson. Applicative constructions (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, Pp. x + 293.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2008

Mikko Roos
Mikko Roos*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Stockholms universitet, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. mikko@ling.su.se
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , June 2008 , pp. 116 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. External possession in a European areal perspective. In Payne, Doris L. & Barshi, Immanuel (eds.), External possession, 109–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues de l'Europe. In Feuillet, Jack (ed.), Actance et Valence dans les langues d’Europe, 505–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lecarme, Jacqueline. 2004. Tense in nominals. In Lecarme, Jacqueline & Guéron, Jacqueline (eds.), Syntax of time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In Mchombo, Sam (ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, 113–150. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha. 2001. Variation in the phase structure of applicatives. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1 105–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehrle, Richard. 1976. The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2006. High and low applicatives: Evidence from Lai. Berkeley Linguistics Society 30 353–364.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar