Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T10:27:46.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Thematic Rules and Regularities1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Markku Filppula
Markku Filppula
Affiliation:
Markku Filppula, Department of English, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 111, SF-80101 Joensuu 10, Finland.
Get access

Abstract

Although linguistic behavior is in general guided by normative rules, it need not all be rule-guided. Also, rules of language differ in their degree of constitutivity, and hence, in their force of obligation. The so-called thematic rules are characteristically of a “weak” constitutivity, and often mere regularities of usage devoid of normativity. Their possible normativity is assessed in terms of contextual-pragmatic correctnees. The thematic organization of sentences illustrates particularly well the special relationship between rule and action, those areas of linguistic behaviour where normativity may shade off into spatiotemporality. From the methodological point of view, all this requires the investigation of thematic systems as mediated through action, and further, the combining of speakers' intuitive knowledge and of observation of actual linguistic behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , June 1982 , pp. 61 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allwood, , Jens, 1976: Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation: A Study in Pragmatics. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 2. Univ. of Gothenburg Dept. of Linguistics, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Bartsch, , Renate, 1979: Semantical and Pragmatical Correctness as Basic Notins of the Theory of Meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 3, 1–43.Google Scholar
Dittmar, , Norbert, 1976: Sociolinguistics. A Critical Survey of Theory and Application. Edward Arnold, Lonton.Google Scholar
Enkvist, , Nils Erik, 1975: Tekstilingustiikan peruskäsitteitä. Oy GaudeamusAb, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Enkvist, , Nils, Erik and Marianne, von 1978: Problems in the Study of Textual Factors in Topicalization. In Andersson, Erik, (ed.) 1978:Google Scholar
Working papers on Computer Processing of Synactic Data. Publications of the Research Institute of the åbo Akademi Foundation 37, åbo, PP. 45–71.Google Scholar
Filppula, , Markku, 1980: Kielitieteen positivismikeskustelusta. Tiede &edistys 5, PP. 36–48.Google Scholar
Fraser, , Bruce, 1973: Optional Rules in Grammar. In Shuy, W., Roger (ed.) 1073:Google Scholar
Report of the Twenty-Third Annual RoundTable Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. Georgrtown University Press, Washington D.G., PP. 1–15.Google Scholar
Ganz, , Joan, Safran 1971: Rules. A Systematic Study. Janua, Linguarumser, Minor, , 96. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, , Auli, , 1976: Reports on Text Linguistics: Suomen kielen generatiivista lauseoppia 2. Publicationa of the Research Institute of the äbo Akademi Foundation 7, äbo.Google Scholar
Hicks, , Malcom, 1976: Parameters Affecting the Position of Gertain English Adiuncts. In Enkvist, , Nils, Erik, and Viljo, Kohonen, (eds.) 1976: Reports on Text Linguistics: Approaches to Word Order. Publications of the Research Institute of the äbo Akademi Foundation 8, äbo, PP. 107–124.Google Scholar
Itkonen, , Esa, 1978: Grammatical Theory and Metascience. John Benjamins B.V., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Itkonen, , Esa, 1980: Qualitative vs. Quantitative Analysis in Linguistics. In Perry, , A., Thomas (ed.) 1980: Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, PP. 334–366.Google Scholar
W., Labov, P., Cohen, C., Robins and J., Lewis 1968: A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City, I. Final Report, Cooperative Research Project 3288. US Office of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lewis, , David, 1974: Languages, Language, and Grammar. In Harman, , Gilbert, (ed.) 1974: On Noam Chomsky: Critical Essays, Anchor Book, New York, PP. 253–266.Google Scholar
Motsch, , Wolfgang, 1977: Grammatiktheorie und Sprachlich Wirklichkeit. Zu Einigen Fragen der Empirischen Begründung Linguistischer Aussagen. In Linguistische Studien, Reihe A, Arbeitsberichte 40. Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Zentralinstitut für Sprachwissenschft, Berlin, PP. 44–61.Google Scholar
Määttä, Urho 1981: Kielellinen toiminta ja kielen säännöt. InKielitieteen ja filosofian suhteesta. Esitelmätilaisuus Helsingissä 24.1.1981. Publications of the Linguistic Association of Finland, Turku, PP.79–89.Google Scholar
Palková, , Zdena, and Bohumil, Palek 1977: Current Trends in Text linguistics. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, PP. 212–227.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1970: Methodological Reflections on Current Linguistic Theory. Synthese. 21, PP. 386–398.Google Scholar
J. R., Searle 1971: What Is a Speech Act? In Searle, J. R. (ed.) 1971: The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, London, PP. 39–53.Google Scholar
Sintonen, , Matti, 1975: The Role of Intuition in Linguisitics. Unpublished progradu thesis in theoretical philosoohy, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Sintonen, , Matti, 1977: Linguistics and the Epistemic Concern. Unpubliahed licentiate thesis in theoretical philosophy, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Sayder, , Aaron, 1971: Rules of Language. Mind LXXX, PP. 161–178.Google Scholar
Stenson, , Nancy, Jean 1976: Topics in Irish Syntax and Semantics. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Wolfram, , Walt, 1973: On what Basis Variable Rules? In Baily, , N., Charles-James and Shuy, Roger W.(eds.) 1973: New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C., PP. 1–12.Google Scholar
Wright, , Georg, Henrik, von, 1975: Explanation and Understanding. Routledge& Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Ziff, , Paul, 1960 Semantic Analysis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar