Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:54:31.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Christer Platzack: Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet. En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1998, 307 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Cedric Boeckx
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, U-1145, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269-1145, USA. E-mail: ceb99001@sp.uconn.edu
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bošlcović, Ž. 1997. Non-finite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Branigan, P. 1996. Verb-second and the A-bar Status of Subjects. Studia Linguistica 50, 5079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 152.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1994. Bare Phrase Structure. MIT Occasional Working Papers in Linguistics #5, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL. Published in Webelhuth G. (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 383439.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. 1993. The Theory of Principles and Parameters. In Jacobs, J., von Stechow, A., Sternefeld, W. & Vennemann, T. (eds), Syntax: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 506569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1983. Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 1991. Extended Projections. Ms., Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A., & Platzack, C. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N. 1997. Control in GB and Minimalism, Glot International 2.8, 36.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. 1999. On Feature Strength: Three Minimalist Approaches to Overt Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 197217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. 1996. A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. 1996a. Germanic Verb Second Languages. Attract vs. Repel: On Optionality, A-bar Movement, and the Symmetrical/Asymmetrical Verb Second Hypothesis. In Lang, E. & Zifonun, G. (eds), Deutsch – typologisch. Berlin: de Gruyter, 92120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C. 1996b. The Initial Hypothesis of Syntax: A Minimalist Perspective on Language Acquisition and Attrition. In Clashen, H. (ed.), Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 369414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C. 1998. A Visibility Condition for the C-domain. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 61, 5399.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J. 1998. Rhyme and Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. J.- W. 1997. Morphosyntax and Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar