Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T02:31:23.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computational Tools for Analysing Talk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Kim Plunkett
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Aarhus University, Asylvej 4, 8240 Risskov, Denmark.
Get access

Abstract

The Child Language Data Exchange System — CHILDES — is the largest child language archive in the world. The archive includes a wide range of languages covering both normal and abnormal populations. The database is freely accessible to the research community and the user is supported with guidelines for carrying out transcription work and software packages for the automatic analysis of transcriptions. The article provides a brief overview of the CHAT transcription notation and the CLAN programs that can be used to analyse transcripts written in CHAT format. Current drawbacks of the CHILDES system are discussed and some pointers to future developments higlighted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L. M. 1973. One Word at a Time: The use of single Word Utterances before Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. London: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. A. 1989. Transcription and the New Functionalism: A Counterproposal to CHILDES ' CHAT conventions. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley Congnitive Science Report No. 58.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. 1977. The Acquisition of Regular and Irregular Past Tense Forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 16, 589600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1990. Computational Tools for Language Analysis: The CHILDES System. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. 1985. The Child Language Data Exchange Scheme. Journal of Child Language 12, 271298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. 1990. The Child Language Dara Exchange Scheme: An Update. Journal of Child Language 17, 457472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. & Chapman, R. S. 1983. Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) - Computer program. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Language Analysis Laboratory, Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1979. Transcription as Theory. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 4372.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Strömqvist, S. 1990. The Acquisition of Scandinavian Languages No. 59 Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar