Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T12:06:04.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological Deviations in Norwegian Conduction Aphasia: Testing a Model of Non-linear Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Inger Moen
Inger Moen
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1102 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
Get access

Abstract

The present study is an analysis of phonologically deviant words in the speech of a group of Norwegin patients suffering from conduction aphasia. The analysis shows that these deviations are not randomly distributed. Their distribution is such that it supports phonological thories which posit hierarchiacal structures both below and above the level of the segment. The deviations can be accounted for within a phonological theory which assumes that a word's lexical phonological representation contains a phonemic level where each phoneme consists of a set of articulatory features which are hierarchically organized with respect to each other, and which also assumes that the phonological representation contains information about the syllable structure of the word.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Special Issue 2: Special issue on NEUROLINGUISTICS , December 1993 , pp. 99 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baum, S. R. & Blumstein, S. E. 1987. Consonant Production Deficits in Aphasia. In Ryalls, J. (ed.), Phonetic Approaches to Speech Production in Aphasia and Related Disorders. San Diego: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Baum, S. R., Blumstein, S. E., Naeser, M. A., Palumbo, C. L. 1990. Temporal Dimensions of Consonant and Vowel Production: An Acoustic and CT Scan Analysis of Aphasic Speech. Brain and Language 39, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Béland, R., Caplan, D. & Nespoulous, J.-L. 1990. The Role of Abstract Phonological Representations in Word Production: Evidence form Phonemic Paraphasias. Journal of Neurolinguistics 5, 125–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S. E. 1973. A Phonological Investigation of Aphasic Speech. The Hugue: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S. E. 1990. Phonological Deficits in Aphasia: Theoretical Perspectives. Cognitive Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics: Advances in Models of Congnitive Function and Impairment. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blumstein, S. E., Cooper, W. E., Goodglass, H., Statlender, S. & Gottlieb, J. 1980. Production Deficits in Aphasia: A Voice-Onset Time Analysis. Brain and Language 9, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A. 1986. On Drawing Inferences about the Structure of Normal Cognitive Systems from the Analysis of Patterns of Impaired Performance: The Case for Single-Patient Studies. Brain and Cognition 5, 41–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1985. The Geometry of Phonological Features. Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. R. & Gawle, C. A. 1984. Apraxic Speakers' Vowel Duration in Consonant-Vowel-Consonant Syllables. In Rosenbek, J. C., McNeil, M. R. & Aronson, A. E. (eds.), Apraxia of Speech. San Diego: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Durand, J. 1990. Autosegmental & Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
van, der Hulst H. & Smith, N. (eds.) 1982. The Structure of Phonological Representaitons Parts 1 and 2. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.Google Scholar
Jahr, E. H. & Lorentz, O. (eds.) 1983. Prosody. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. 1989. Phonology: A Cognitive View. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kohn, S. E. 1988. Phonological Production Deficits in Aphasia. In Whitaker, H. A. (ed.), Phonological Processes and Brain Mechanisms. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lecours, A. R. & Lhermitte, F. 1969. Phonemic Paraphasias: Linguistic Structures and Tentative Hypotheses. Cortex 5, 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, M. R., Liss, J. M., Tseng, C.-H. & Kent, R. D. 1990. Effects of Speech Rate on the Absolute and Relative Timing of Apraxic and Conduction Aphasic Sentence Production. Brain and Language 38, 135–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moen, I. 1983. Konduksjonsafasi: En fonologisk analyse av spontantalen (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo).Google Scholar
Moen, I. & Sundet, K. 1992. Production and Perception of Word Tones (Pitch Accents) in Patients with Left and Right hemisphere Damage (Manuscript submitted for publicaiton).Google Scholar
Reinvang, I. & Engvik, H. 1980. Handbok Norsk grunntest for afasi. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Ryalls, J. H. 1987. Voewl Production in Aphasia: Towards an Account of the Consonant-Vowel Dissociation. In Ryalls, J. H. (ed.), Phonetic Approaches to Speech Production in Aphaassia and Related Disorders. Boston: College-Hill Publication.Google Scholar
Stark, H. K. & Stark, J. A. 1990. Syllable Structure in Wernicke's Aphasia. In Nespoulous, J.-L. & Villard, P. (eds.), Morphology, Phonology, and Aphasia. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tuller, B. 1984. On Categorizing Speech Errors. Neuropsychologia 22, 547–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed