Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:08:19.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agriculture and Environmental Policy: Recent United States and Australian Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Bengt Hyberg  and
Sean Pascoe
Bengt Hyberg
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Sean Pascoe
Affiliation:
Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Get access

Abstract

Agricultural development in both the United States and Australia has led to suboptimal levels of environmental degradation. While both countries face similar forms of agricultural environmental degradation, the different resource endowment and population distributions have resulted in a different incidence of the costs of these problems. Increasing demand for environmental services and better information on off-site damages have led to increasing demand for reform of agricultural, rural development, and environmental programs to eliminate biases against practices viewed as more environmentally compatible.

Type
The Effects of Agricultural Production on Environmental Quality
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 114 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies or the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. The authors would like to thank C. Edwin Young. Stephanie Mercier. Harold Stults, and the anonymous referees for helpful comments.

References

Alt, K., Osborn, C. T., and Colacicco, D. Soil Erosion: What Effect on Agricultural Productivity? Agricultural Information Bulletin no. 556. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, January 1989.Google Scholar
Blyth, M., and McCallum, A. “Onsite Cost of Land Degradation in Agriculture and Forestry.” In Land Degradation: Problems and Policies, edited by Chisholm, A. and Dumsday, R. Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bradsen, J., and Fowler, R. “Land Degradation: Legal Issues and Institutional Constraints.” In Land Degradation: Problems and Policies, edited by Chisholm, A. and Dumsday, R., 129–67. Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. O. “Problems of Adaption of Pastoral Businesses in the Arid Zone.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 10 (1966):14–26.Google Scholar
Centre of Policy Studies. Victoria's Irrigation Systems: Study of the Distribution of Costs and Benefits. Monash University, Melbourne, December 1983.Google Scholar
Chisholm, A. “Abatement of Land Degradation: Regulations vs. Economic Incentives.” In Land Degradation: Problems and Policies, edited by Chisholm, A. and Dumsday, R., 223–47. Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. R. European Farming in Australia: An Economic History of Australian Farming. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1981.Google Scholar
de Steiguer, J. E. “The Influence of Incentive Programs on Investment.” In Proceedings, Nonindustrial Private Forests: A Review of Economic and Policy Studies. Duke University, 1983.Google Scholar
Haynes, J. E., and Sutton, M. Taxation Measures and Soil Conservation. Bureau of Agricultural Economics Occasional Paper no. 93. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1985.Google Scholar
Hyberg, B. “Offsite Costs of Soil Erosion in the Murray Darling Basin.” ERS Working Paper. 1990a.Google Scholar
Hyberg, B. “Interactions between Agricultural Policies and the Environment.” Paper presented at the Australian Agricultural Economics Society Meetings, Brisbane, QLD, 13–15 February 1990b.Google Scholar
Kirby, M., and Blyth, M. “Economic Aspects of Land Degradation in Australia.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 31 (1987):154–74.Google Scholar
Moncrieff, I. J., and Mauldon, R. G. “The Effect of Land Clearing Regulations on the Rate of Farm Development: A Case Study.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 7 (1963):172–79.Google Scholar
Moore, M. R., and McGuckin, C. A. “Program Crop Production and Federal Irrigation Water.” In Agricultural Resources: Cropland, Water and Conservation Situation and Outlook, 39–46. Situation and Outlook Report no. AR-12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, September 1988.Google Scholar
Murray Darling Basin Ministerial Council (MDBMC). Draft Salinity and Drainage Strategy. MDBMC Discussion Paper no. 1. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1988.Google Scholar
Napier, T. L., and Forster, D. L. “Farmer Attitudes and Behavior Associated with Soil Erosion Control.” In Soil Conservation Policies, Institutions and Incentives, edited by Halcrow, H. G., Heady, E. O., and Cotner, M. L., 137–50. Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society of America, 1982.Google Scholar
Randall, A. “Property Entitlements and Pricing Policies for a Maturing Water Economy.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 25 (1981):195–220.Google Scholar
Reichelderfer, K. H. “Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?” Agricultural Economics Report number 532. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, April 1985.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M. O. Water Quality Benefits from the Conservation Reserve Program. Agricultural Economics Report number 606. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, February 1989.Google Scholar
Rickson, R., Saffigna, P., Vanclay, F., and McTainsh, G. “Social Bases of Farmers’ Responses to Land Degradation.” In Land Degradation: Problems and Policies, edited by Chisholm, A. and Dumsday, R., 187–200. Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. “Trees and Taxation.” Australian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2 (1989):11–13.Google Scholar
Rose, R. N., Moir, B. G., Farquharson, R. J., and Vanzetti, D. M. Assistance for the Consumption and Production of Fertilizers. BAE submission to the IAC, AGPS, Canberra, 1984.Google Scholar
Strohbehn, R., ed. An Economic Analysis of USDA Erosion Control Programs: A New Perspective. Agricultural Economics Report no. 560. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, August 1986.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Second RCA Appraisal: Soil, Water and Related Resources on Nonfederal Land in the United States—Analysis of Condition and Trends. Washington, DC, 1987.Google Scholar
Watson, W. D., and Rose, R. N. “Irrigation Issues for the Eighties: Focusing on Efficiency and Equity in the Management of Agricultural Water Supplies.” Paper presented at the 24th Annual Australian Agricultural Economics Society Meetings, Adelaide, 12–14 February 1980.Google Scholar
Wonder, B. “Sustaining Australia's Agricultural Resources.” Paper presented at the National Agricultural Outlook Conference, Canberra, January 1989.Google Scholar
Young, E. C., and Osborn, C. T. The Conservation Reserve Program: An Economic Assessment. Agricultural Economics Report no. 626. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, February 1989.Google Scholar
Young, M. “Land Tenure: Plaything of Governments or an Effective Instrument?” In Land Degradation: Problems and Policies, edited by Chisholm, A. and Dumsday, R., 175–86. Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar