Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:30:01.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A General, Dynamic, Supply-Response Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Robert G. Chambers
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Ramon E. Lopez
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access

Extract

This paper is divided into two parts which are somewhat independent. The first part of this paper discusses certain properties of a general autonomous control model that appears promising for the analysis of general dynamic supply response models in agricultural economics, resource economics, and related fields. The second part of the paper, which can be read somewhat independently of the first, emphasizes the potential empirical applications of special cases of the general model discussed in the first part. In what follows, we always deal with continuous time and infinite horizon models because of their analytical tractability. Extension and modification of our results for discrete-time, finite-horizon problems should be fairly obvious and are left to the interested reader.

Type
AAEA/NAREA Invited Session: Dynamic Supply Response and Agricultural Investment
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Scientific Article No. A-3996, Contribution No. 6980 of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Blackorby, C. and Schworm, W.Aggregate Investment and Consistent Intertemporal Technologies.” Review of Economic Studies 49 (1982):595614.Google Scholar
Chambers, Robert G.Dynamic Supply Response and the Partial-Adjustment Model”; University of Maryland, October 1983.Google Scholar
Chambers, Robert G.Dynamic Stability Consistent Aggregation, and the Behavior of the Steady State.” Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Maryland, June 1984.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. G. and Lopez, R. E.Equity Formation and the On-Farm, Off-Farm Labor Choice.” Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Maryland, October 1983.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. J. and McLaren, K. R.Atemporal, Temporal, and Intertemporal Duality in Consumer Theory.” International Economic Review 21 (1980):599609.Google Scholar
Eisner, R. and Strotz, R. H.Determinants of Business Investment.” in Impacts of Monetary Policy; Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. G.Duality Theory and Functional Forms for Dynamic Factor Demands.” Review of Economic Studies 48 (1981):8195.Google Scholar
Gandolfo, G. Economic Dynamics: Methods and Models 2d ed. New York: North-Holland, 1979.Google Scholar
Kamien, M. and Schwartz, N. Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. New York: North-Holland, 1982.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.Optimal Investment Policy and the Flexible Accelerator.” International Economic Review 81 (1967):7885.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. and Sargent, T. J. Rational Expectation and Econometric Practice vol. 1—(Minneapolis; University of Minnesota, Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Mortensen, D. T.Generalized Costs of Adjustment and Dynamic Factor Demand Theory.” Econometrica 41 (1973):657–65.Google Scholar
Muellbauer, J.Aggregation, Income Distribution, and Consumer Demand.” Review of Economic Studies 42 (1975):525–43.Google Scholar
Shalit, H. and Schmitz, A.Farmland Accumulation and PricesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (1982):710719.Google Scholar
Steigum, E.A Financial Theory of Investment BehaviorEconometrica 51 (1983):637–46.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. R.Stochastic Dynamic Duality: Theory and Empirical ApplicabilityAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Treadway, A.The Globally Optimal Flexible AcceleratorJournal of Economic Theory 7 (1974):1739.Google Scholar