Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T03:26:58.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumer Perceptions and Attitudes towards Bovine Somatotropin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Harry M. Kaiser
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Clifford W. Scherer
Affiliation:
Department of Communication, Cornell University
David M. Barbano
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Cornell University
Get access

Extract

This article investigates the possible negative effects of bovine somatotropin (bST) and antibiotic use in cows on fluid-milk consumption in New York State. Based on data from a consumer survey, the potential change in milk consumption due to bST and antibiotic use is estimated. In addition, the current perceptions of consumers about bST and antibiotics are measured, and the significant socioeconomic, demographic, and attitudinal characteristics of consumers that are related to their milk-consumption response to bST are identified.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank Blair Smith and an anonymous reviewer for useful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Animal Health Institute. Bovine Somatotropin (BST). Alexandria, VA, 1988.Google Scholar
Baer, R.J., Tieszen, K.M., Schingoethe, D.J., Casper, D.P., Eisenbeisz, W.A., Shaver, R.D., and Cleale, R.M.Composition and Flavor of Milk Produced by Cows Injected with Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin.” Journal of Dairy Science 72 (1989):1424–34.Google Scholar
Barbano, D.M., and Lynch, J.M.Milk from bST-Treated Cows: Composition and Manufacturing Properties.” In Proceedings of Conference on Advanced Technologies Facing the Dairy Industry: bST, 919. Cornell University, Animal Science Mimeograph Series no. 133. Ithaca, NY, November 1989.Google Scholar
Bauman, D.E., Hard, D.L., Crooker, B.A., Partridge, M.S., Garrick, K., Sandies, L.D., Erb, H.N., Franson, S.E., Hartnell, G.F., and Hintz, R.L.Long-Term Evaluation of a Prolonged-Release Formulation of n-Methionyl Bovine Somatotropin in Lactating Dairy Cows.” Journal of Dairy Science 72 (1989):642–51.Google Scholar
Bauman, D.E., Eppard, P.J., DeGeeter, M.J., and Lanza, G.M.Responses of High Producing Dairy Cows to Long-Term Treatment with Pituitary Somatotropin and Recombinant Somatotropin.” Journal of Dairy Science 68 (1985):1352–62.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S., and Taylor, S.Bovine Growth Hormone (Somatotropin): Agricultural and Regulatory Issues.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 20 November 1986.Google Scholar
Brown, W.1990 Census Preliminary Counts.” Paper presented at the New York State Data Center Meeting, Troy, NY, 1 November 1990.Google Scholar
Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association. “Biotechnology and the American Agricultural Industry.” Journal of the American Medical Association 265 (1991):1429–36.Google Scholar
Daughaday, W.H., and Barbano, D.M.Bovine Somatotropin Supplementation of Dairy Cows: Is the Milk Safe?Journal of the American Medical Association 264 (1990):1003–5.Google Scholar
Fallert, R.T., McGuckin, T., Betts, C., and Bruner, G.bST and the Dairy Industry: A National, Regional, and Farm Level Analysis.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, October 1987.Google Scholar
Gaines, L.M.Tabulations from the Current Population Survey for New York State.” New York State Department of Economic Development, 1990.Google Scholar
Hutton, J.B.The Effect of Growth Hormone on the Yield and Composition of Cows’ Milk.” Journal of Endocrinology 16 (1957):115–25.Google Scholar
Juskevich, J.C., and Guyer, C.G.Bovine Growth Hormone: Human Food Safety Evaluation.” Science 249 (1990):875–84.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.M., and Tauer, L.W.Potential Impacts of Bovine Somatotropin on the U.S. Dairy Sector.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 11 (1989):5973.Google Scholar
Kalter, R.J., Milligan, R., Lesser, W., Magrath, W., Tauer, L., Bauman, D., McGuirk, A., Andrysick, E., and Grosh, M.Biotechnology and the Dairy Industry: Production Costs, Commercial Potential, and the Economic Impact of Bovine Growth Hormone.” A.E. Research 85–20. Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, December 1985.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Marion, B.W., and Wills, R.L.A Prospective Assessment of the Impacts of Bovine Somatotropin: A Case Study of Wisconsin.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (1990):326–36.Google Scholar
McGuirk, A.M., Preston, W.P., and McCormick, A.Toward the Development of Marketing Strategies for Food Safety Attributes.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 6 (1990):297308.Google Scholar
McGuirk, A.M., Preston, W.P., and Jones, G.M.Biotechnology and the Consumer: The Case of Bovine Somatotropin.” Staff Paper 90–60. Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1991.Google Scholar
Milk Industry Foundation. 1990 Milk Facts. Washington, DC, 1990.Google Scholar
National Institute of Health. “NIH Technology Assessment Conference Statement on Bovine Somatotropin.” Journal of the American Medical Association 265 (1991):1423–25.Google Scholar
Peel, C.J., Bauman, D.E., Gorswit, R.C., and Sniffen, C.J.Effect of Exogenous Growth Hormone on Lactational Performance in High Yielding Dairy Cows.” Journal of Nutrition 111 (1981):1662–71.Google Scholar
Preston, W.P., McGuirk, A.M., and Jones, G.M.Consumer Response to the Introduction of Bovine Somatotropin.” In Economics of Food Safety, edited by Caswell, J.A. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
Scherer, C.W.Adoption of Health Risk Reduction Behaviors: The Case of Geologic Radon.” Department of Communication, Cornell University, 1989.Google Scholar
Sechen, S.J., Bauman, D.E., Tyrell, H.F., and Reynolds, P.J.Effect of Somatotropin on Kinetics of Nonesterified Fatty Acids and Partition of Energy, Carbon and Nitrogen in Lactating Dairy Cows.” Journal of Dairy Science 72 (1989):5967.Google Scholar
Smith, Blair. “Consumer and Public School Perceptions on the bST Issue in Pennsylvania.” In Farm Economics. Cooperative Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, The Pennsylvania State University, March/April 1991.Google Scholar