Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:24:22.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimating the Derived Demand for Sewage Sludge in Crop Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Alex Barbarika Jr.
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S.D.A.
Kenneth E. McConnell
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Daniel Colacicco
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S.D.A.
William J. Bellows
Affiliation:
National Marine Fisheries Service
Get access

Abstract

One option for the disposal of sewage sludge is land spreading, including application to private croplands. Land spreading may allow some of the sewage treatment costs to the municipality or county to be offset by farmers’ payments for sludge as a crop producing resource. This study investigates the conditions under which a market for sludge will emerge. A linear programming model of a profit maximizing corn for gain farm is formulated and the quantity of sludge available is parametrically varied to trace out marginal productivity curves under various situations. The results for Anne Arundel county, Maryland sludge show a range in value from 0–35 $/ton at application rates from 0–20 tons/acre/year for three years.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Scientific Article No. A-4024, contribution No. 7008 of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Hillmer, T. T. Jr.Transporting Liquid Sewage Sludge by Tank Truck: An Economic Perspective,” Compost Science 17 (1976):2832.Google Scholar
Ibach, D. B., and Adams, J. R.Crop Yield Response to Fertilizer in the U.S.” USDA, ERS, Stat. Bull. No. 431. 295 p. 1968.Google Scholar
Jekinek, C. F., and Braude, G. L.Management of Sludge Use on Land.” Journal of Food Protection. 41 (1978):476480.Google Scholar
Loftis, T. C., and Ward, R. C.Optimization of Subsurface Injection of Municipal Sewage Sludge.” Journal of Environmental Quality 8 (1979):339343.Google Scholar
Maryland Department of Agriculture. “Maryland Agricultural Summary for 1978.” Compiled by Maryland Crop Reporting Service, College Park, Maryland. Publ. No. 113, 1981.Google Scholar
Ott, S. L., and Foster, D. L.Sewage Sludge on Agricultural Land.” In Loehr, R. C. (Editor), Food, Fertilizer and Agricultural Residues, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp. 169183. 1978.Google Scholar
Reisner, G. C., and Christensen, R. L.Impact on Farm Costs and Returns from Sludge Application in Forage Production.” In Loehr, R. C. (Editor), Food, Fertilizer and Agricultural Residues, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp. 157167. 1978.Google Scholar
Seitz, W. D., and Swanson, E. R.Economic Aspects of the Applications of Municipal Wastes to Agricultural Land.” Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Recycling Municipal Sludges and Effluents on Land. Champaign, Ill., pp. 175-182, 1973.Google Scholar
University of Maryland Agronomy Department. Guidelines for the Application of Sewage Sludge to Land. Agronomy Mineo No. 10. 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil: The Yearbook of Agriculture. USGPO, 1957.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Crop Reporting Board. Agricultural Prices. Crop Reporting Board, Washington, D.C. May 1982.Google Scholar
Walker, J. M.Overview: Costs, Benefits and Problems of Utilization of Sludges.” Proceedings of 8th National Conference on Municipal Sludge Management. Miami Beach, Florida, pp. 167-174, 1979.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D.C., and Epp, S. J.Modeling The Use of Sewage Sludge on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms: An Economic Analysis.” J. Northeastern Agr. Econ. Council. 13 (1984):8288.Google Scholar