Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T05:20:22.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responding to Patients' Requests for Information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Extract

There is little argument against the principle that the health care consumer has the right to all pertinent information regarding his condition and treatment. Nevertheless, there is resistance and patients frequently have difficulty obtaining important information.

Generally, it is the responsibility of the physician to inform the patient of his diagnosis and condition, the recommended treatment, its risks and its side effects, and any alternative treatments. This is the essence of obtaining the patient's informed consent, without which treatment is illegal and unethical. An important aspect of the nurse's role is to safeguard the patient's right to receive this information, and, when necessary, to assist the patient in obtaining it. Since she is in frequent close contact with the patient, the nurse should evaluate the patient's understanding and should inform the physician when further information or clarification is needed. Furthermore, when the nurse realizes that the patient has not received or understood the necessary information, the nurse should advise the patient of his right to receive it before consenting to any treatment or procedure.

Type
Ethical Dilemmas
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tuma v. Board of Nursing, 593 P.2d 711 (Idaho 1979).Google Scholar
2. Id., at 717.Google Scholar
3. See, e.g., Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, 211 N.E.2d 253 (Ill. 1965).Google Scholar