Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T14:41:24.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Free Improvisation as Experience: A pragmatic insight into improvisational gesture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2021

Kristin Kuldkepp
Kristin Kuldkepp*
Affiliation:
Research group ‘Kinetics in Sound and Space’, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
*
Emails: kristin.kuldkepp@haw-hamburg.de; kkuldkepp@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents the possible proximity between the philosophical tradition of pragmatism and the present-day practice of free improvisation, a musical activity that enjoys its ambiguous nature of not being clearly defined, that is, however, of value to examine as a practice in its own rights. It is used in educational and compositional contexts as a tool, as well as being an established independent performance practice, albeit for a relatively small body of audience. The discussion is led through three concepts that are utilised by pragmatists, but which resonate with the concerns of free improvisers: experience, expressive object and gesture. Outlining these key ideas, the article sheds light on John Dewey’s and Giovanni Maddalena’s thoughts on aesthetics, which provide a perspective for examining these inherent issues of free improvisation. Through a philosophical examination, the article seeks to enlighten the performance processes of the musical phenomenon of free improvisation.

Type
Article
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 26 , Issue 1: The Sonic and the Electronic in Improvisation , April 2021 , pp. 100 - 109
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, D. 1993. Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music. Boston: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Berliner, P. F. 1994. Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobussen, M. 2017. The Field of Musical Improvisation. Leiden: Leiden University Press.10.24415/9789400603011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colapietro, V. 2013. Time as Experience/Experience as Temporality. Pragmatic and Perfectionist Reflections on Extemporaneous Creativity. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 5(1). https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/594 (accessed 27 April 2020).10.4000/ejpap.594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, S. 2001. Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199241589.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Penguin Group (USA).Google Scholar
Flusser, V. 2014. Gestures, trans. Roth, N. A.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gritten, A. and King, E. 2011. Introduction. In Gritten, A. and King, E. (eds.) New Perspectives on Music and Gesture. Surrey and Burlington: Ashgate, 1–9.Google Scholar
Iyer, V. 1998. Microstructures of Feel, Macrostructures of Sound: Embodied Cognition in West African and African-American Musics. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Iyer, V. 2008. On Improvisation, Temporality, and Embodied Experience. In Miller, P. D. (ed.) Sound Unbound – Sampling Digital Music and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 273–92.Google Scholar
Krekels, T. 2018. Loosening the Saxophone. Entanglements of Bodies in the Politics of Free Improvisation. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Leddy, T. 2020. Dewey’s Aesthetics. In E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/dewey-aesthetics/ (accessed 3 October 2020).Google Scholar
Lewis, G. 1996. Improvised Music after 1950: Afrological and Eurological Perspectives. Black Music Research Journal 16(1): 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddalena, G. 2015. The Philosophy of Gesture – Completing Pragmatists’ Incomplete Revolution. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Mori, I. 2009. Ikue Mori: At Home in Strange Lands. Interview with F. J. Oteri, 16 July. Transcribed by D. J. Kushner and F. J. Oteri. https://nmbx.newmusicusa.org/ikue-mori-at-home-in-strange-lands/ (accessed 1 October 2020).Google Scholar
Peters, G. 2009. The Philosophy of Improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226662800.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radano, R. 1992. Jazzin’ the Classics: The AACM’s Challenge to Mainstream Aesthetics. Black Music Research Journal 12(1): 79–95.10.2307/779283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D. 2001. Diva-Dogs: Sounding Women Improvising. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Smithers, T. 1996. On What Embodiment Might Have to Do with Cognition. In M. Mataric (ed.) Embodied Cognition and Action: Papers from the 1996 AAAI Fall Symposium. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. –––www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/1996/FS-96–02/FS96–02–024.pdf (accessed 9 May 2020).Google Scholar

VIDEOGRAPHY

Hopkins, P. 2009. Amplified Gesture – An Introduction to Free Improvisation Practitioners and their Philosophy. YouTube, www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e60eKflPfo (accessed 23 April 2020).Google Scholar
Payne-Frank, N. and Macfarlane, K. 2017. Free Improvisation: Still the Ultimate Underground Music? The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/music/video/2017/nov/15/free-improvisation-still-the-ultimate-in-underground-music (accessed 9 May 2020).Google Scholar