Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-30T18:18:11.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bill Fontana’s Distant Trains: A documentation of an acoustic relocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Robert Stokowy
Robert Stokowy*
Affiliation:
Sound Studies at the University of Arts Berlin, Lietzenburger Straße 45, D-10789 Berlin
*
Email: mail@robert-stokowy.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Witnessing a sound installation in person offers an opportunity to experience the qualities and elements of a work first hand and in full, multisensory effect. A thorough documentation of an exhibition and the work that goes into it is at the essence of preserving important information for future generations. Though information can be gathered from archives, some works of sound art are only marginally presented in the literature, making it difficult to fully grasp aspects of an artist’s technical, organisational and, most particularly, creative ways of working. Instead, already existing information is often reproduced. Previous documentation regarding Bill Fontana’s Sound Sculpture Distant Trains, exhibited in Berlin in 1984, offers an example of the possible loss of key details. This article aims to present new research findings that will examine and illuminate the full scope of this artistic project.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: Context-based Composition , April 2017 , pp. 112 - 121
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthelmes, B. 1984. Photographer of Sound. MusikTexte 10: 59–60.Google Scholar
Block 1984. Flyer for Distant Trains (Entfernte Züge), DAAD archive.Google Scholar
Cage, J. and Schöning, K. 1985. Roaratorio: Ein irischer Circus über Finnegans Wake, 2nd edn. Königstein/Ts: Athenäum.Google Scholar
De La Motte, D. 1984. Klangräume, Klangträume in Berlin Bill Fontana – Julius – Bernhard Leitner. Der Ausschnitt 6: 555–556.Google Scholar
Drees, S. 2009. Bill Fontanas ‘urban sound sculptures’ und die Idee der Relokalisierung von Klängen. In S. Drees and H. Weber (eds.) Musik – Transfer – Kultur: Festschrift für Horst Weber (Vol. 8). Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Engström, A. and Stjerna, Å. 2009. Sound Art or Klangkunst? A Reading of the German and English Literature on Sound Art. Organised Sound 14(1): 11–18.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. 1983. Sound Sculpture with Distant Trains. Project Proposal with Sketches, Drawings and Descriptions. DAAD Archive Berlin.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. 1986. Distant Trains. Soundings Magazine 14(15): 103–107.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. 2008. The Relocation of Ambient Sound: Urban Sound Sculpture. Leonardo 41: 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontana, B. and Schöning, K. 1994. Ohrbrücke/Soundbridge Köln – San Francisco 1987. CD-Booklet: 10.Google Scholar
Gertich, F. 1999. Klangskulpturen, Klangskulpturen – Klanginstallationen. In H. De la Motte-Haber (ed.) Klangkunst: Tönende Objekte und klingende Räume Vol. 12. Laaber, Germany: Laaber-Verlag.Google Scholar
Knothe, R. 1987. Anhalter Bahnhof: Entwicklung u. Betrieb; Zeugen u. Zeugnisse aus über 100 Jahren. Berlin: Verl. Ästhetik u. Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Lewallen, C. 1985. Metaphor, Matter, Canvas, Stage: Conceptual Art 1968 to 1995. In S. Nash (ed.) Facing Eden: 100 Years of Landscape Art in the Bay Area. San Francisco: Fine Arts Museum of San Francisco.Google Scholar
Maier, H. 1984. Berlin, Anhalter Bahnhof. Berlin: Verl. Ästhetik und Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Straebel, V. 2008. Zur frühen Geschichte und Typologie der Klanginstallation. In U. Tadday (ed.) Klangkunst. Munich: Richard-Boorberg-Publishing.Google Scholar