Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T19:20:06.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Borrowed for Permanent Use: The Instruments INDIA commissions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2019

Steven Naylor
Steven Naylor*
Affiliation:
School of Music, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, CanadaB4P 2R6
*
Email: steven.naylor@sonicart.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reflects on a number of issues surrounding the appropriation of culturally identifiable sound material for artistic purposes – both overall or broader concerns and those that may arise particularly in conjunction with electroacoustic musical composition. More specifically, we explore questions potentially raised by three electroacoustic compositions recently commissioned by the Instruments INDIA project, a unique cultural partnership between Liverpool Hope University (represented by Dr Manuella Blackburn) and Milapfest (represented by Alok Nayak). Those three compositions were created exclusively with materials from an extensive library of Indian music performances, curated and recorded by Blackburn specifically for Instruments INDIA, and premiered in concert in Liverpool, UK, 20 January 2017. Following the broader discussion of relevant concerns, we briefly review some perspectives offered by the three composers (one of whom is the author), as they relate to cultural appropriation in general, and working with the Instruments INDIA sound library in particular.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 24 , Issue 2: Borrowing, Quotation, Sampling and Plundering , August 2019 , pp. 121 - 129
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andean, J. 2012. Cultural Relativism in Acousmatic Music. Musiikin Suunta 2: 26–31.Google Scholar
Andean, J. 2014. Towards an Ethics of Creative Sound. Organised Sound 19(2): 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2011. Importing the Sonic Souvenir: Issues of Cross-cultural Composition. Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Conference, Sforzando! New York, June. www.ems-network.org (accessed 10 September 2018).Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2014a. Instruments INDIA: A Sound Archive for Educational and Compositional Use. Organised Sound 19(2): 146–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2014b. Editorial. Organised Sound 19(2): 107–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2017. Other People’s Sounds: Examples and Implications of Borrowed Audio. Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Studies Network Conference. Nagoya, September. www.ems-network.org (accessed 10 September 2018).Google Scholar
Dixon, G. 2017. Programme note, Instruments INDIA showcase concert, 20 January 2017. (Author’s collection.)Google Scholar
Dixon, G. 2018. Private email correspondence. 21 June.Google Scholar
Instruments INDIA. n.d. www.milapfest.com/instruments-india/.Google Scholar
Milapfest. n.d. www.milapfest.com/home/aboutus/.Google Scholar
Naylor, S. 2012. Information Asphyxiation: Procrastination, Distraction and the Digital Artist. https://econtact.ca/15_2/naylor_infoasphyxiation.html (accessed 10 September 2018).Google Scholar
Naylor, S. 2014. Appropriation, Culture and Meaning in Electroacoustic Music: A Composer’s Perspective. Organised Sound 19(2): 110–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehrawat, I. 2017. Programme note, Instruments INDIA showcase concert, 20 January 2017. (Author’s collection.)Google Scholar
Shehrawat, I. 2018. Private email correspondence. 7 September.Google Scholar
Taperssection Forum. n.d. https://taperssection.com.Google Scholar

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: SELECTED ONLINE MEDIA COVERAGE

(All sites accessed 9 September 2018)

Bear Nicholas, A. 2017. Canada’s laws have ignored the cultural and intellectual property rights of Indigenous peoples, and even legalized the theft of their property. 27 June. policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/june-2017/who-owns-indigenous-cultural-and-intellectual-property.Google Scholar
Bird, H. 2017. Cultural Appropriation: Make It Illegal Worldwide, Indigenous Advocates Say. 13 June. cbc.ca/news/canada/north/cultural-appropriation-make-it-illegal-worldwide-indigenous-advocates-say-1.4157943.Google Scholar
Domise, A. 2017. How Some People Are Missing the Point on Cultural Appropriation. 22 May. macleans.ca/opinion/how-some-people-are-missing-the-point-on-cultural-appropriation.Google Scholar
Hanorah. 2018. 10 or So Questions to Ask Yourself Before Making Art About a Group You Don’t Belong to. 4 July. cbc.ca/arts/10-or-so-questions-to-ask-yourself-before-making-art-about-a-group-you-don-t-belong-to-1.4732386.Google Scholar
Hynes, M. and Zellars, R. 2017. Worried You’ve Crossed the Line into Cultural Appropriation? Consider This… 5 November. cbc.ca/radio/tapestry/cultural-appreciation-vs-cultural-appropriation-1.4386343/worried-you-ve-crossed-the-line-into-cultural-%20appropriation-consider-this-1.4386346.Google Scholar
Glavin, T. 2017.The Unbearable Whiteness of Joseph Boyden’s Aboriginal Identity Controversy. 4 January. nationalpost.com/opinion/terry-glavin-the-unbearable-whiteness-of-joseph-boydens-aboriginal-identity-controversy.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. 2016. A Point of View: When Does Borrowing from Other Cultures Become ‘Appropriation’? 11 March. bbc.com/news/magazine-35782855.Google Scholar