Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T14:25:10.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvisation through Performance-installation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

John Richards  and
Tim Shaw
John Richards*
Affiliation:
Music, Technology and Innovation – Institute for Sonic Creativity (MTI2), De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Tim Shaw*
Affiliation:
Culture Lab & Fine Art, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
*
Email: jrich@dmu.ac.uk
Email: tim.shaw@ncl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article builds on Richards’s work to formulate an understanding of the emerging practice of performance-installation, which embraces sound art, DIY electronic music and maker culture. A number of key points are addressed in this formulation: making/unmaking and ‘public making’; the assembling/disassembling of sonic devices and artefacts in the performance space; sound ‘through’ materials and materials at hand; and site and architectural features as material. In addition, readymade actions, illustrated by George Brecht’s The Cabinet, and the relationship between audience and performer are also presented. The article continues by outlining practice undertaken by the authors comprising two UK tours: ‘Sacrificial Floors’, 2018 with Tetsuya Umeda; and ‘Points of Failure’, 2020. Derek Bailey’s idea of ‘instrumental impulse’ is extended to include the concepts of expanded and reduced instruments that encompass ‘instrument as object’ and ‘raw material as instrument’. ‘Instrument’ is also viewed as a distributed mesh-like structure in which collective improvisation may occur. Borrowing from Ingold, ‘wayfaring’ is used to describe improvising with materials found ‘along the way’. Silent actions, uncontrollable instruments, unstable systems, performative failures, reimagined affordance of objects, ‘playing with resource’ and ‘improvising inside electronics’ are all addressed in relation to performance-installation. Finally, the authors explore the idea of ‘virtuosity in listening’, and question sonic autonomy and self-expression in improvisation and how ‘attending to sound’ can be an active part of improvised performance.

Type
Article
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 27 , Issue 2: The Sonic and the Electronic in Improvisation, Part 2 , August 2022 , pp. 144 - 155
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, D. 1993. Improvisation, Its Nature and Practice in Music, Hachette Books,Google Scholar
Bowers, J. 2002. Improvising Machines: Ethnographically Informed Design for Improvised Electro-acoustic Music. ARiADAtexts 4. http://soundartarchive.net/articles/ bowers-improvising_machines.pdf (accessed 8 September 2020).Google Scholar
Bowers, J. and Archer, P. 2005. Not Hyper, Not Meta, Not Cyber but Infra-Instruments. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME05), Vancouver, Canada, 5–10.Google Scholar
Bowers, J., Richards, J., Shaw, T., Frize, J., Freeth, B., Topley, S. et al. 2016. One Knob to Rule Them All: Reductionist Interfaces for Expansionist Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Brisbane, Australia, 11–15 July.Google Scholar
Brecht, G. 1960. Notes on the shipping and exhibiting of MEDICINE CABINET (alternative titles: MEDICINE CHEST, CABINET), 1960, mimeo-graphed, carbon document dated 11.16.61. New York: Museum of Modern Art Library.Google Scholar
Cage, J. 1990. I–VI. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cardew, C. 1971. Towards an Ethic of Improvisation. In Treatise Handbook. New York: Edition Peters.Google Scholar
Collins, N. 2004. Composers inside Electronics: Music after David Tudor. Leonardo Music Journal 14: 1–3.Google Scholar
Cox, C. 2011. Beyond Representation and Signification: Toward a Sonic Materialism. Journal of Visual Culture 10: 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. 2018a. Sonic Flux Sound, Art, and Metaphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. 2018b. Sonic Realism and Auditory Culture: A Reply to Marie Thompson and Annie Goh. Parallax 24(2): 234–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezeuze, A. (2002). Origins of the Fluxus Score: From Indeterminacy to the ‘Do-It-Yourself’ Artwork. Performance Research 7(3): 78–94.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Theory of Affordances. In The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hayes, L. 2017. From Site-specific to Site-responsive: Sound Art Performances as Participatory Milieu. Organised Sound 22(1): 83–92.Google Scholar
Hewitt, D. 2016. Oscillators in 20 Minutes, Radically Performing Electronics. Neural. http://neural.it/2016/09/20-oscillators-in-20-minutes-radically-performing-electronics (accessed 8 September 2020).Google Scholar
Hogg, B. 2013. The Violin, the River, and Me: Artistic Research and Environmental Epistemology in Balancing String and Devil’s Water 1, Two Recent Environmental Sound Projects. Hz. www.hz-journal.org/n18/hogg.html (accessed 8 September 2020).Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2016. Lines. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. 2006. ‘The clutter of the unkempt forest‘: John Cage, Music and American Environmental. American Studies 51(4): 567–79.Google Scholar
Kaprow, A. 1965. Assemblage, Environments and Happenings. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Kaprow, A. 1966. Some Recent Happenings. New York: Great Bear Pamphlets.Google Scholar
Kee, J. 2008. Points, Lines, Encounters: The World According to Lee Ufan. Oxford Art Journal 31(3): 405–24.Google Scholar
Lippit, T. M. 2020. Listening with Hands: The Instrumental Impulse and Invisible Transformation in Turntablism. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester.Google Scholar
Pritchett, J. 1996. The Music of John Cage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 2008. Getting the Hands Dirty. Leonardo Music Journal 18: 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. 2017. DIY and Maker Communities in Electronic Music. In Collins, N. and Escrivan, R. J. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Electronic Music, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 238–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. 2021. Sacrificial Floors and Tables: Making/Unmaking Sound. In Grant, J., Matthias, J. and Prior, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Sound Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. and Landy, L. In press. The Music of Sounds and the Music of Things.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 2009. From Abstraction to Model: George Brecht’s Events and the Conceptual Turn in Art of the 1960s. October 127: 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, T. and Bowers, J. 2015. Public Making: Artistic Strategies for Working with Museum Collections, Technologies and Publics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electronic Art, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Shaw, T. and Bowers, J. 2020. Ambulation: Exploring Listening Technologies for an Extended Sound Walking Practice. Proceedings of International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Birmingham, UK, 23–28.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 2017. Whiteness and the Ontological Turn in Sound Studies. Parallax 23(3): 266–82.Google Scholar
Umeda, T. 2017. The Wonderland of Tetsuya Umeda: Creating ‘Situations‘ to Generate ‘Phenomena‘. The Japan Foundation, Performing Arts Network Japan. https://performingarts.jp/E/art_interview/1707/1.html (accessed 19 October 2021).Google Scholar
Umeda, T. 2018. Interview with John Richards, 5 January.Google Scholar
Wainwright, M. and Richards, J. 2019. Simple & Radical. Noise.technology. https://noise.technology/snr.html (accessed 8 September 2020).Google Scholar