Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T03:22:46.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socio-Sonic: An ethnographic methodology for electroacoustic composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2014

Tullis Rennie
Tullis Rennie*
Affiliation:
Sonic Arts Research Centre, Queens University Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland.
*
Email: trennie01@qub.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper outlines a way forward for an anthropologically inclined electroacoustic music. Considering the similarities in methodological approaches between the fields of ethnography and soundscape composition, this paper proposes to further the use of contextual information when making compositional decisions with sound materials derived from field recordings: a socio-sonic methodology. To begin the discussion, theoretical readings of sound in context are presented. Parallels are highlighted between the practices of ethnographic study and soundscape composition, illustrated with the work of Steve Feld and the World Soundscape Project. A brief consideration of the soundscape–acousmatic continuum with reference to works by Luc Ferrari, Denis Smalley and Hildegard Westerkamp is followed by a combined summation of ethnographic, soundscape and acousmatic approaches to outline a socio-sonic methodology for composition. Examples of work by Peter Cusack, Justin Bennett and Bob Ostertag are discussed alongside my own work Manifest – a fixed-media composition based on field recordings and interviews made at political protests in Barcelona. The potential is for a music considered equally for its sonic and socio-political properties.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 19 , Special Issue 2: The Sound of Cultures , August 2014 , pp. 117 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chion, M. 1983. Guide des objets sonores: Pierre Schaeffer et la recherche musicale. Paris: Éditions Buchet/Chastel.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1993. The State of Musique Concrète. Contemporary Music Review 8(1): 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conquergood, D. 1991. Rethinking Ethnography: Towards a Critical Cultural Politics. Communication Monographs 56(June): 179–194.Google Scholar
Demers, J. 2009. Field Recording, Sound Art and Objecthood. Organised Sound 14(1): 39–45.Google Scholar
Drever, J. L. 2002. Soundscape Composition: The Convergence of Ethnography and Acousmatic Music. Organised Sound 7(1): 21–27.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1986. The Relationship of Language to Materials. In S. Emmerson (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 17–39.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2007. Living Electronic Music. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Feld, S, Brenneis, D. 2004. Doing Anthropology in Sound. American Ethnologist 31(4): 461–474.Google Scholar
Fetterman, D. M. 2010. Ethnography: Step-by-Step. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Kane, B. 2007. L'Objet Sonore Maintenant: Pierre Schaeffer, Sound Objects and the Phenomenological Reduction. Organised Sound 12(1): 15–24.Google Scholar
Lane, C., Carlyle, A. 2013. In The Field: The Art Of Field Recording. Cornwall: Uniformbooks.Google Scholar
Ostertag, B. 1991. Sooner Or Later, RecRec Music (ReCDec 37) [Liner notes].Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 2004. Impacts intérieurs. Montreal: Empreintes Digitales, IMED 0409-CD. [Liner notes]Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2008. Soundscape Composition as Global Music: Electroacoustic Music as Soundscape. Organised Sound 13(2): 103–109.Google Scholar
Various. 1997. The Alan Lomax Collection Sampler [CD] Burlington: Rounder Records RounderCD1700.Google Scholar
Waters, S. 2000. Beyond the Acousmatic: Hybrid Tendencies in Electroacoustic Music. In S. Emmerson (ed.) Music, Electronic Media and Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 56–83.Google Scholar