Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:57:52.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Space–Emotion in Acousmatic Music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Federico Schumacher Ratti*
Affiliation:
Universidad Diego Portales, Grajales 1746, Santiago de Chile
Claudio Fuentes Bravo*
Affiliation:
Universidad Diego Portales, Grajales 1746, Santiago de Chile

Abstract

This article presents a multimodal exploratory study aimed at searching for evidence that can guide us in the adoption and/or improvement of appropriate theoretical–methodological approaches for studying the role of the spatiality/spatialisation of sound and the cognitive/affective empathic processes involved in the acousmatic experience. For this purpose, controlled listening sessions were conducted in which fragments of different loudspeaker music were presented. The subjects reported their emotional experience and the degree of familiarity they assigned to each sound fragment. Specific questions for the acousmatic fragments inquire into the potential relationships between the sound stimulus and the emotion declared by the subjects. From these experiences, qualitative reports were obtained through a semi-structured interview, and electrodermal activity (EDA) logs were recorded in parallel for an intended group. Based on these results, it is argued that spatiality might be linked to a complex cognitive–affective response from the listeners and emerges as a distinctive element of the meaning that the listeners ascribe to their acousmatic musical experience.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alcázar, A. 2004. Análisis de la música electroacústica – género acusmático – a partir de su escucha. PhD thesis, Facultad de Bellas Artes de la Universidad Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
Alexander, S. 2007. Spatialisation in Multichannel Works: What Does the Listener Perceive? Masters thesis, De Monfort University.Google Scholar
Baird, A., Sheffer, I. and Wilson, S. 2011. Mirror Neuron System Involvement in Empathy: A Critical Look at the Evidence. Soc Neurosci 6(4): 327335.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. 2005. Responding to the Emotions of Others: Dissociating Forms of Empathy through the Study of Typical and Psychiatric Populations. Conscious Cogn. 14(4): 698718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosh, I., Salimpoor, V. and Zatorre, J. 2013. Familiarity Mediates the Relationship between Emotional Arousal and Pleasure during Music Listening. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 110.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. 2014. Cómo funciona la música. Barcelona: Reservoir Books.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1998. Les deux espaces de la musique concrète. In F. Dhomont (ed.) L’espace du son I. Bruxelles: Musiques et Recherches.Google Scholar
Choi, I., Bharadwaj, H. M., Bressler, S., Loui, P., Lee, K. and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. 2014. El procesamiento automático de tonalidad musical abstracta. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J. 2011. The Neurorevolution of Empathy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1231: 3545.Google Scholar
Decety, J. and Svetlova, D. 2012. Putting Together Phylogenetic and Ontogenic Perspectives of Empathy. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci 2(1): 124.Google Scholar
Delalande, F. 2003. Le paradigme électroacoustique. In J. J. Nattiez (ed.) Musiques: Une encyclopédie pour le XXIè siècle I: Musiques du XXé siècle. Paris: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Delalande, F. 2013. Analyser la musique, pourquoi, comment? Paris: INA.Google Scholar
Dhomont, F. 1988. Navigation a l’ouïe: la projection acousmatique. In F. Dhomont (ed.) L’espace du son I. Bruxelles: Musiques et Recherches.Google Scholar
Díaz, J. L. and Flores, E. 2001. La estructura de la emoción humana: Un modelo cromático del sistema afectivo. Salud Mental 24(4): 2035.Google Scholar
Egermann, H. and McAdams, S. 2013. Empathy and Emotional Contagion as a Link between Recognized and Felt Emotions in Music Listening. Music Perception 31(2): 139156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez Pinto, I., López-Pérez, B. and Márquez, M. 2008. Empatía: Medidas, teorizas y aplicaciones en revisión. Anales de psicología 24(2): 284298.Google Scholar
Fleming, W. 1986. Arte, Música e Ideas . México: Interamericana.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. H. and Halton, T. R. 1951. Note on Exact Treatment of Contingency, Goodness-of-fit and Other Problems of Significance. Biometrika 38: 141149.Google Scholar
García de la Torre, A. 2011. Música actual y espacio acústico. www.euskonews.com/0578zbk/gaia57803es.html (accessed 10 September 2017).Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. M., Rentfrow, P. J. and Baron-Cohen, S. 2015. Can Music Increase Empathy? Interpreting Musical Experience through the Empathizing–Systemizing (ES) Theory: Implications for Autism. Empirical Musicology Review 10(1–2): 8095.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. 2015. Additional Considerations to the Model of Musical Empathic Engagement: Empathy Facets, Preferences, and Openness: Comment on ‘Music, Empathy, and Cultural Understanding’ by E. Clarke et al. Physics of Life Reviews 15: 8991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernández, C. and Baptista, P. 2004. Metodología de la Investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hunter, P., Schellemberg, G. and Schimmack, U. 2010. Feelings and Perceptions of Happiness and Sadness induced by Music: Similarities, Differences, and Mixed Emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts 4(1): 47–6.Google Scholar
Huron, D. 2007. Sweet Expectation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Juslin, P. and Sloboda, J. (eds.) 2010. Handbook of Music Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kallinen, K. 2008. Emotions Related Psychophysiological Responses to Listening to Music with Eyes-open Versus Eyes-closed: Electrodermal (EDA, Electrocardiac (ECG), and Electromyographic (EMG) Measures. Proceedings 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Evanston, IL, 3–4 August.Google Scholar
Kendall, G. 2010. Spatial Perception and Cognition in Multichannel Audio for Electroacoustic Music. Organised Sound 15(3): 222238.Google Scholar
Kendall, G. and Ardila, M. 2008. The Artistic Play of Spatial Organisation: Spatial Attributes, Scene Analysis and Auditory Spatial Schemata. In R. Kronland-Martinet, S. Ystad and K. Jensen (eds) Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval: Sense of Sounds. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Küpper, L. 1988. Space Perception in the Computer Age. In F. Dhomont (ed.) L’espace du son I. Brussels: Musiques et Recherches.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 2001. Measuring Intention against Reception in Electroacoustic Music. A New Opportunity for Analysis. Proceedings ICMC 2001, Havanna, 17–22 September.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 2006. The Intention/Reception Project. In Mary Simoni (ed.) Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F. 1989. Contraintes cognitives sur les systèmes compositionnels. Contrechamps10 Composition et perception. Lausanne: Editions l’âge d’homme.Google Scholar
López-Pérez, B., Fernández-Pinto, I. and Abad, F. J. 2008. TECA. Test de EmpatíaCognitiva y Afectiva. Madrid: Tea Ediciones, S.A.Google Scholar
Margullis, E. 2014. On Repeat: How Music Plays the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matyja, J. and Schiavio, A. 2013. Enactive Music Cognition. Background and Research Themes. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 351357.Google Scholar
Mendoza, J. 2014. Self-reported Measurement of Segmentation, Mimesis and Perceived Emotions in Acousmatic Electroacoustic Music. Master thesis, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. 2005. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. 1956. Émotion et signification en musique. Paris: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Nakayama, T., Tanetoshi, M., Osamu, K., Michio, O. and Takeo, S. 1971. Subjective Assessment of Multichannel Reproduction. Journal of Audio Engineering Society 19: 744751.Google Scholar
Rumsey, F. 1999. Subjective Assesment of the Spatial Attributes of Reproduced Sound. Proceedings 15th AES International Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark, 31 October–2 November.Google Scholar
Rumsey, F. 2002. Spatial Quality Evaluation for Reproduced Sound: Terminology, Meaning, and a Scene-Based Paradigm. Journal of Audio Engineering Society 50(9): 651666.Google Scholar
Santander, P. 2011. Por qué y cómo hacer análisis de discurso. Cinta moebio 41: 207224.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Scherer, P. 2004. Which Emotions Can be Induced by Music? What Are the Underlying Mechanism? And How Can We Measure Them? Journal of New Music Research 33(3): 230251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiavio, A. 2014. Music in (en)action. Sense-making and Neurophenomenology of Musical Experience. PhD thesis, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
Schumacher, F. 2015. El rol del espacio en la clarificación de los materiales sonoros en música acusmática. Resonancias 19(36): 3753.Google Scholar
Schumacher, F. and Fuentes, C. 2016. Doble articulación y ciencias cognitivas de tercera generación: desafiando las nociones tradicionales en torno a la experiencia musical acusmática. Resonancias 20(39): 93111.Google Scholar
Schumacher, F. and Fuentes, C. In press. La experiencia de escucha acusmática: una propuesta de análisis. Revista Musical Chilena.Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S., Aharon-Peretz, J. and Perry, D. 2009. Two Systems for Empathy: A Double Dissociation between Emotional and Cognitive Empathy in Inferior Frontal Gyrus Versus Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions. Brain 132(3): 617627.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 2007. Space-form and the Acousmatic Image. Organised Sound 12(1): 3558.Google Scholar
Spiegel, M. and Stephens, L. 2002. Estadística. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.Google Scholar
Weale, R. 2006. Discovering How Accessible Electroacoustic Music Can Be: The Intention/Reception Project. Organised Sound 11(2): 211222.Google Scholar
Weale, R. and Landy, L. 2010. El Proyecto de Intención/Recepción y su relevancia en el campo de la producción y en el de la educación musical (The Intention/Reception Project and Its Relevance in Music Making as Well as Education.) En El Límite1. www.unla.edu.ar/public/en_el_Limite/index.php (access 10 September 2017).Google Scholar
Wöllner, C. 2012. Is Empathy Related to the Perception of Emotional Expression in Music? A Multimodal Time-series Analysis . Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts 6(3): 214.Google Scholar
Zaki, J. and Ochsner, K. 2012. The Neuroscience of Empathy: Progress, Pitfalls and Promise. Nature Neuroscience 15(5): 675680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. 2004. The Neurology of Ambiguity. Consciousness and Cognition 13: 173196.Google Scholar

Discography

Autechre. 1994. Basscadet. On Basscad EP. Chicago: Wax Trax! Records, WAP44CD.Google Scholar
Ferrari, L. 1995. Presque Rien Nº1 (1967–70). On Presque Rien. Paris: MUSIDISC 245172.Google Scholar
Hawtin, R. 1998. Contain. On Consumed. Ontario: Minus and Novamute.Google Scholar
Koenig. M. 1979. Output. On Acousmatrix 1–2. Netherlands: BV Haast Records CD9001/2.Google Scholar
Redolfi, M. 1979. Pacific Tubular Waves. Paris: GRM REGRM 014.Google Scholar
Schumacher, F. 2012. Las Partículas Elementales. On Métamorphoses 2012. Bruxelles: MandR 2012.Google Scholar
Schumacher, F. n.d. Los Náufragos de la Medusa (2014). https://soundcloud.com/federicoschumacherratti/los-naufragos-de-la-medusa-2014-82-canales-reduccion-estereo (accessed 14 September 2017).Google Scholar
Westerkamp, H. 1997. Gently Penetrating Beneath the Sounding of Another Place (1997). On Into India. Montréal: Empreintes Digitales ES 02002.Google Scholar