Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:51:44.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The multiple scales of biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Catherine Badgley*
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. E-mail: cbadgley@umich.edu

Extract

The claim that measures of global biodiversity dynamics are meaningless is based upon several methodological problems, including underrepresentation of tropical regions in “global” Phanerozoic data sets, inaccuracies in taxonomic data, non-equivalence of higher taxa among groups of organisms, and uneven sampling intensity across groups, environments, and time intervals. Some of these problems are inherent in the fossil record, whereas others lie in documentation and interpretation of the subject. But the subject of global biodiversity is perfectly legitimate, even if problems persist in evaluating its full history. Moreover, recognition of the methodological problems has resulted in notable improvements in the Phanerozoic diversity database (e.g., Adrain and Westrop 2000; Alroy et al. 2001).

Type
Matters of the Records
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adrain, J. M., and Westrop, S. R. 2000. An empirical assessment of taxic paleobiology. Science 289:110112.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., et al. 2001. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:62616266.Google Scholar
Badgley, C., and Fox, D. L. 2000. Ecological biogeography of North American mammals: species density and ecological structure in relation to environmental gradients. Journal of Biogeography 27:14371467.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. 1995. Diversification and extinction in the history of life. Science 268:5258.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., and Kurzius, M. 1989. Spatial and temporal variation in guilds of North American granivorous desert rodents. Pp. 7190in Morris, D. W., Abramsky, Z., Fox, B. J., and Willig, M. R., eds. Patterns in the structure of mammalian communities. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock.Google Scholar
Currie, D. J. 1991. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal-and plant-species richness. American Naturalist 137:2749.Google Scholar
O'Brien, E. M. 1998. Water-energy dynamics, climate, and prediction of woody plant species richness: an interim general model. Journal of Biogeography 25:379398.Google Scholar
Pauly, D. 2002. Setting a baseline: world fisheries and ecosystems in 1950. American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting, 2002, Boston, Program and abstracts, p. A29.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L., et al. 2001. Can we defy nature's end? Science 293:22072208.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1979. Biases in the fossil record of species and genera. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 13:8591.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1993. Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns. Paleobiology 19:4351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, B. A., Kutner, L. S., and Adams, J. S. 2000. Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar