Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:47:43.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proboscidean origins of mastodon and woolly mammoth demonstrated immunologically

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Jeheskel Shoshani
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202
Jerold M. Lowenstein
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
Daniel A. Walz
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201
Morris Goodman
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

Abstract

Immunologically reactive protein substances were extracted from bone samples of an American mastodon (Mammut americanum), 10,200 yr old by radiocarbon dating, and from muscle samples of three woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius), 10,000, 40,000 and 53,000 yr old, respectively. The mastodon samples contained significant quantities of the amino acids hydroxylysine and hydroxyproline, both of which are usually found in collagens and not in albumins. Using these products and other comparable extracts, as well as sera and purified collagens from modern elephants and other living mammals, as test antigens, immunological comparisons were carried out with the following antisera: rabbit anti-mastodon bone; chicken anti-mammoth muscle; chicken anti-elephant muscle; rabbit anti-elephant albumin and rabbit anti-elephant collagen, as well as with rabbit antisera to purified albumins and collagens of other mammals. For the first time, mastodon bone was found to have elephant-like proteins, which elicited antibodies that reacted strongly with collagen and serum proteins of extant elephants. Mammoth muscle strongly reacted with anti-elephant collagen and anti-elephant albumin, but the concentrations of the recoverable mammoth collagen and albumin decreased with increasing chronological age of the mammoth specimens. Nevertheless, in the immunological comparisons, the mammoth was closer to Asian (Elephas maximus) and African (Loxodonta africana) elephants than to the mastodon; in turn, the mastodon was closer to these elephantid species than to mammals outside the order Proboscidea.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aguirre, E. 1969. Evolutionary history of the elephant. Science. 164:13661376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arslanov, Kh. A., Lyadov, V. V., Tertychnaya, T. A., and Filonov, B. A. 1982. On the absolute age of the Khatanga mammoth. Pp. 1718. In: Vereshchagin, N. K. and Kusmina, L. E., eds. The mammoth fauna of the Asian Part of the USSR. Proc. Zool. Inst. Vol. 3. Pp. 1–96, 18 pl.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M. I., Barmatoski, S. P., Goodman, M., Romero-Herrera, A. E., Lande, N. A., Birk, D. E., Shoshani, J., Prychodko, W., Lerman, E. J., and Mikhelson, V. M. 1980. Tissue vestiges of an ancient Magadan mammoth calf. Scanning Electr. Microsc. 1980:1118.Google Scholar
Coppens, Y., Maglio, V. J., Madden, C. T., and Beden, M. 1978. Proboscidea. Pp. 336367. In: Maglio, V. J. and Cooke, H. B. S., eds. Evolution of African mammals. Harvard Univ. Press; London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, W. W. 1982. Eye lens proteins and vertebrate phylogeny. Pp. 75114. In: Goodman, M., ed. Macromolecular sequences in systematic and evolutionary biology. Plenum Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dene, H., Goodman, M., and Prychodko, W. 1978. An immunological examination of the systematics of Tupaioidea. J. Mamm. 59(4):697706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorr, J. A. Jr. and Eschman, D. F. 1971. Geology of Michigan. Univ. Michigan Press; Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dorr, V., Goebel, N., Haslock, J., Lehto, K., Shoshani, J., Sujdak, P., Vaerten, M. A., Zoch, F., and Zoch, P. 1982. A guide to the Groleau-White Lake Mastodon (Michigan's second mounted mastodon), Mammut americanum. Oakland Community College, Highland Lakes Campus, Union Lake; Michigan.Google Scholar
Eyre, D. R. 1980. Collagen: molecular diversity in the body's protein scaffold. Science. 207:13151322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrand, W. R. 1961. Frozen mammoths and modern geology. Science. 133:729835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, D. C. 1984. Mastodon butchery by North American Paleo-Indians. Nature. 308:271272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, M. and Moore, W. G. 1971. Immunodiffusion systematics of the Primates. I. The Catarrhini. Syst. Zool. 20(1):1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, M., Birk, D. E., Romero-Herrera, A. E., Lande, M. A., Dene, H., and Barnhart, M. I. 1980. Collagen preservation in soft tissue from the Magadan mammoth. FEBS Lett. 114:3034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurten, B. and Anderson, E. 1980. Pleistocene mammals of North America. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Lehninger, A. L. 1975. Biochemistry (2d ed.). Worth Publishers, Inc.; New York.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, J. M., Sarich, V. M., and Richardson, B. J. 1981. Albumin systematics of the extinct mammoth and Tasmanian wolf. Nature. 291:13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowry, O. H., Rosenbrough, N. J., Fau, A. L., and Randall, R. S. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagents. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M. C. 1975. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia. Pp. 2146. In: Luckett, W. P. and Szalay, F., eds. Phylogeny of the primates: a multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maglio, V. J. 1973. Origin and evolution of the Elephantidae. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. Phila. 63(3):1149.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S. 1967. Prehistoric overkill. Pp. 75120. In: Martin, P. S. and Wright, H. E. Jr., eds. Pleistocene extinctions: the search for a cause. Yale Univ. Press; New Haven.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1942. Proboscidea. Am. Mus. Press, New York, 2:8051675.Google Scholar
Prager, E. M., Wilson, A. C., Lowenstein, J. M., and Sarich, V. M. 1980. Mammoth albumin. Science. 209:287289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romer, S. A. 1966. Vertebrate paleontology (3d ed.). Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago.Google Scholar
Shoshani, J., Goodman, M., Barnhart, M. I., Prychodko, W., Vereshchagin, N. K., and Mikhelson, V. M. 1981. Blood cells and proteins in the Magadan mammoth calf: immunodiffusion comparisons of Mammuthus to extant paenungulates and tissue ultrastructure. Pp. 191220. In: Vereshchagin, N. K. and Mikhelson, V. M., eds. Magadan baby mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach). “Nauka” Publishers; Leningrad.Google Scholar
Shoshani, J., Waltz, D. A., Goodman, M., Lowenstein, J. M., and Prychodko, W. 1985. Protein and anatomical evidence on the phylogenetic position of Mammuthus primigenius within the Elephantidae. Acta Zool. Fenn. 170:237240.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 85:1350.Google Scholar
Skeels, M. A. 1962. The mastodons and mammoths of Michigan. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts Letters. 47:101119.Google Scholar
Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H., and Moore, S. 1958. Automatic recording apparatus for use in the chromatography of amino acids. Anal. Chem. 30:11901206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, J. and Pannell, R. 1973. Selective removal of albumin from plasma by affinity chromatography. Clin. Chim. Acta. 49:4952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valente, A. 1983. Hair structure of the woolly mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius and the modern elephants, Elephas maximus and Loxodonta africana. J. Zool. Lond. 199(2):271274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vereshchagin, N. K. 1982. New Gydansk (Yuribey) mammoth discovery. N. Zool. 3:3238.Google Scholar
Vereshchagin, N. K. and Mikhelson, V. M., eds. 1981. Magadan baby mammoth Mammuthus primigenius (Blumenbach). “Nauka” Publishers; Leningrad.Google Scholar
Warren, J. C. 1852. “Mastodon giganteus” of North America. John Wilson and Sons; Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar