Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:57:16.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A serious matter with character-taxon matrices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Geerat J. Vermeij
Geerat J. Vermeij*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Center for Population Biology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616. E-mail: vermeij@geology.ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Knowing the structure and branching order of the evolutionary tree is essential to many studies of the evolutionary process and the history of life. Most attempts to reconstruct evolutionary trees are based on rectangular matrices, in which coded states are assigned for each character and each taxon under study. Everyone who has tried to infer the pattern of evolution from such character-taxon matrices is confronted with a great deal of “noise” and uncertainty. Often, there are multiple “most parsimonious trees” (those requiring the fewest evolutionary steps), which often differ significantly in topology; and many nodes in such trees are poorly supported; that is, there are contradictions and inconsistencies in the data. Some of this noise arises for reasons well known to phylogeneticists. Character states may arise multiple times, evolve in parallel, or reverse (homoplasy); taxa vary insufficiently among themselves; and diversification may be so rapid that data are insufficient to detect the order of branching. Polytomies are regarded as a nuisance rather than as real information. Characters may be coded inappropriately, so that there are too many redundancies, inapplicable character states, and multistate characters, as well as dependence among characters. Moreover, it is highly debatable whether evolution is parsimonious, and there are conflicts about how to establish the polarity of characters (primitive vs. derived). (For reviews and discussion see Sober 1988; Huelsenbeck and Crandall 1997.)

Type
Matters of the Record
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , Fall 1999 , pp. 431 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Fox, D. L., Fisher, D. E., and Leighton, L. R. 1999. Reconstructing phylogeny with and without temporal data. Science 284:1816–1819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P., and Crandall, K. A. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 28:437–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, M., and Gerhart, J. 1998. Evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:8420–8727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponder, W. F., and Lindberg, D. R. 1997. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: an analysis using morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 119:83–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the past: parsimony, evolution, and inference. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. N. 1999. The evolution of species interactions. Science 284:2116–2118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeij, G. J. 1973. Adaptation, versatility, and evolution. Systematic Zoology 22:466–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1999. Inequality and the directionality of history. American Naturalist 153:243–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, P. J. 1998. A likelihood approach for evaluating estimates of phylogenetic relationships among fossil taxa. Paleobiology 24:430–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1998. Origin of the molluscan class Bivalvia and a phylogeny of major groups. Pp. 1–45in Johnston, P. A. and Haggart, J. W., eds. Bivalves: an eon of evolution—paleobiological studies honoring Norman D. Newell. University of Calgary Press, Calgary.Google Scholar