Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T20:18:46.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biogenic and Physical Modes of Stratification and Shell Bed Formation in the Recent Intertidal Environments of Bahia la Choya, Northern Gulf of California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Keith H. Meldahl
Keith H. Meldahl*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Get access

Abstract

Fossil concentrations such as shell beds are preferred collection sites for paleontological and paleoecological data. Although ample attention has been paid to the roles and implications of physical processes in shell bed formation, the role of biogenic sediment reworking in generating shell beds has received little study.

Subsurface shell beds in the Recent intertidal environment at Bahia la Choya form via three distinct processes: storm deposition, tidal channel migration, and biogenic reworking. Shell beds on the outer tidal flats are produced primarily by storm sedimentation. Lateral migration of the main tidal channel produces shell beds along the channel margins. Shell beds on the inner flats distant from the main tidal channel are generated by vertical “conveyorbelt” recycling of fine sediment by deposit feeders. Biogenic reworking concentrates shells at depth into subsurface shell beds, producing a distinct form of biogenic bedding, termed biogenic stratification.

These three modes of shell bed formation leave recognizable taphonomic and sedimentologic signatures. Biogenic stratification in particular has important implications for sedimentation rates, sediment reworking, and faunal condensation in ancient strata.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 2: Paleoecology and Taphonomy of Pleistocene to Recent Intertidal Deposits, Gulf of California , 1987 , pp. 177 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aigner, T. 1985. Storm Depositional Systems. Dynamic Stratigraphy in Modern and Ancient Shallow-Marine Sequences. Springer, Berlin, 174p.Google Scholar
Aigner, T. 1982. Calcareous tempestites: Storm-dominated stratification in Upper Muschelkalk limestones (Middle Trias, SW-Germany). in: Einsele, G., and Seilacher, A., eds., Cyclic and Event Stratification. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 180–198.Google Scholar
Aller, R.C., 1982. Carbonate dissolution in nearshore terrigenous muds: The role of physical and biological reworking. Journal of Geology, 90: 75–79.Google Scholar
Brenner, R.L., and Davies, D.K. 1973. Storm-generated coquinoid sandstone: Genesis of high-energy marine sediments from the upper Jurassic of Wyoming and Montana. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84: 1685–1698.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C.E., and Baird, G.C. 1986. Comparative taphonomy: a key to paleoenvironmental interpretation based on fossil preservation. Palaios, 1: 207–227.Google Scholar
Cadée, G.C. 1976. Sediment reworking by Arenicola marina on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 10: 440–460.Google Scholar
Clifton, H.E., and Boggs, S. Jr. 1970. Concave-up pelecypod (Psephidia) shells in shallow marine sand, Elk River beds, southwestern Oregon. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 40: 888–897.Google Scholar
Farrow, G.E., Allen, N.H., and Akpan, E.B. 1984. Bioclastic carbonate sedimentation on a high-latitude, tide-dominated shelf: northeast Orkney Islands, Scotland. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 54: 373–393.Google Scholar
Flessa, K.W., and Ekdale, A.A. 1987. Paleoecology and taphonomy of Recent to Pleistocene deposits, Gulf of California. in Davis, G.H., and VandenDolder, E.M., eds., Geologic diversity of Arizona and its margins: Excursions to choice areas. Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Special Paper 5.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F.T. 1982. Rhythmic bedding and shell bed formation in the Upper Jurassic of East Greenland. in: Einsele, G., and Seilacher, A., eds., Cyclic and Event Stratification. Springer, Berlin, p. 208–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürsich, F.T. 1978. The influence of faunal condensation and mixing on the preservation of fossil benthic communities. Lethaia, 11: 243–250.Google Scholar
Howard, J.D. 1975. The sedimentological significance of trace fossils. in, Frey, R.W., ed., The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer, New York, p. 131–146.Google Scholar
Howard, J.D. 1978. Sedimentology and trace fossils. in Basan, P.B., ed., Trace Fossil Concepts: S.E.P.M. Short Course No. 5: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Oklahoma City, p. 11–42.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S.M. 1986 Taphonomic feedback in Miocene assemblages: testing the role of dead hardparts in benthic communities. Palaios, 1: 239–255.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S.M. 1985. Paleobiological and sedimentological implications of fossil concentrations. Nature, 318: 457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, S.M., and Aigner, T. 1985. Sedimentary dynamics of complex shell beds: implications for ecologic and evolutionary patterns. in: Bayer, U., and Seilacher, A., eds., Sedimentary and Evolutionary Cycles: Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 1, Springer, Berlin, p. 382–395.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S.M., and Jablonski, D. 1983. Taphonomic feedback: ecological consequences of shell accumulation. in: Tevesz, M.J.S., and McCall, P.L., eds., Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum, New York, p. 195–248.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S.M., Fürsich, F.T., and Aigner, T. 1986. Conceptual framework for the analysis and classification of fossil concentrations. Palaios, 1: 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreisa, R.D., and Bambach, R.K. 1982. The role of storm processes in generating shell beds in Paleozoic shelf environments. in: Einsele, G., and Seilacher, A., eds., Cyclic and Event Stratification. Springer, Berlin, p. 200–207 Google Scholar
MacGinitie, G.E. 1934. The natural history of Callianassa californiensis Dana. American Midland Naturalist, 15: 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meldahl, K.H. 1987. Sedimentologic and taphonomic implications of biogenic stratification. Palaios, in press.Google Scholar
Norris, R.D. 1986. Taphonomic gradients in shelf fossil assemblages: Pliocene Purisima Formation, California. Palaios, 1: 256–270.Google Scholar
Peterson, C.H. 1976. Relative abundances of living and dead molluscs in two California lagoons. Lethaia, 9: 137–148.Google Scholar
Speyer, S.E., and Brett, C.E. 1986 Trilobite taphonomy and Middle Devonian taphofacies. Palaios, 1: 312–327.Google Scholar
Swinbanks, D.D., and Luternauer, J.L. 1987. Burrow distribution of thalassinidean shrimp on a Fraser Delta tidal flat, British Columbia. Journal of Paleontology, 61: 315–331.Google Scholar
Trewin, N.H., and Welsh, W. 1976. Formation and composition of a graded estuarine shell bed. Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeocology, 19: 219–230.Google Scholar
van Straaten, L.M.J.U. 1952. Biogenic textures and the formation of shell beds in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Proceedings Koninklijke nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Series B. Physical Sciences, 55: 500–516.Google Scholar