Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T08:23:25.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geological Age Determinations by Non-Radiometric Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

James B. Cowart
James B. Cowart*
Affiliation:
Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306
Get access

Abstract

Because no one was around to chronicle most of the geological events which occurred during the earth's history, it is necessary to rely upon somewhat less direct (but no less useful) methods to place these events in the proper time frame. The basic assumptions used are 1) we live in an ordered universe, and 2) physical laws have not changed through time. The assigning of an age (in years) to a particular event requires that some process having a predictable rate be utilized. Various radioactive nuclides are commonly used but a number of other methods provide supplementary or complementary chronologic information. These other methods include tree-ring counting, varve counting, thermoluminescence, amino acid racemization, obsidian hydration, and magnetic reversals. Because of the cross testing of methods and the interlocking nature of the age data, the geologic time scale rests upon a very firm foundation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 1: The Evolution-Creation Controversy: Perspectives on Religion, Science, and Education-A Handbook , 1984 , pp. 77 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, R. Y., Dean, W. E., Kirkland, D. W., and Snider, H. I. 1972. Permian Castile varved evaporite sequence, West Texas and New Mexico. Bulletin Geological Society of America, 83: 59.Google Scholar
Daniels, F., Boyd, C. A., and Saunders, D. F. 1953. Thermo luminescence as a research tool: Science, 117: 343.Google Scholar
Flint, R. F. 1971. Glacial and Quaternary geology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 892 p.Google Scholar
Friedman, I. and Evans, C. 1968. Obsidian dating revisited. Science, 162: 813.Google Scholar
Friedman, I. and Smith, R. L. 1960. A new dating method using obsidian, Part 1, The development of the method. American Antiquity, 25: 476.Google Scholar
Hare, P. E. and Abelson, P. H. 1968. Racemization of amino acids in fossil shells. Carnegie Institute of Washington Yearbook, 66: 526.Google Scholar
Judson, S., Deffeyes, K. S., and Hargraves, R. B. 1976. Physical geology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 560 p.Google Scholar
McDougall, D. J. ed. 1968. Thermoluminescence of geological materials. Academic Press, New York, 357 p.Google Scholar
McPhee, J. 1980. Basin and Range. Farrar-Straus-Giroux, New York, 216 p.Google Scholar
Rankama, K. 1954. Isotope geology. Pergamon, London, 535 p.Google Scholar
Runcorn, S. K. 1964. Changes in the earth's moment of inertia. Nature, 204: 823.Google Scholar
Tarling, D. H. 1971. Principles and applications of paleomagnetism. Chapman and Hall, London, 164 p.Google Scholar
Wehmiller, J. F., Hare, P. E., and Kujala, G. A. 1976. Amino acids in fossil corals. racemization (epimerization) reactions and their implications for diagenetic models and geochronological studies: Geochimica and Cosmochimica Acta, 40: 763.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W., 1963, Coral growth and geochronometry. Nature, 197: 948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, D. 1979. Polonium halos and geochronology. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union, 617.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. 1958. Dating the past. Methuen and Co., London, 516 p.Google Scholar