Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T02:21:40.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intertidal Bioerosion by Macroinvertebrates near Puerto Penasco, Northern Gulp of California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

R. F. Stearley*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Get access

Extract

Bioerosion–the active excavation of rock and shell material by organisms– is a significant degradational process in many marine sedimentary environments. This phenomenon is prominent in the northern Gulf of California, where coastal carbonate “beachrock” is undergoing erosion by a diverse suite of invertebrates. Near Puerto Peñasco, Sonora, the varied intertidal settings display distinctive associations of macroboring infauna, and accompanying biokarst.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bromley, R. G. 1975. Trace fossils at omission surfaces, in, Frey, R. W., ed., The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer- Verlag, New York, p. 399428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, R.G. 1978. Bioerosion of Bermuda reefs. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 23: 169198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, R.G., and D'Alessandro, A. 1984. The ichnogenus Entobia from the Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene of southern Italy: Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 90, 227296.Google Scholar
Brusca, R.C. 1980. Common Intertidal Invertebrates of the Gulfof California. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, 513 p.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. 1978. Ecology and evolution of the Gastrochaenacea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) with notes on the evolution of the endolithic habitat. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, Bulletin, v. 41, 92 p.Google Scholar
Ekdale, A. A., Bromley, R.G., and Pemberton, S.G. 1984. Ichnology: Trace Fossils in Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Short Course No. 15, 317 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1968. The role of Penitella penita (Conrad, 1837) (Family Pholadidae) as eroders along the Pacific coast of North America. Ecology, 49: 156159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, N.P., Kobluk, D.R., and Pemberton, S.G 1977. The oldest macroborers: Lower Cambrian of Labrador. Science, 197: 980983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobluk, D. R. 1981. Lower Cambrian cavity-dwelling endolithic(boring) sponges. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18: 972980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepe, P. J. 1983. Bioerosion by a polychaete annelid, Eunice afra Peters, at Puerto Peñasco, Gulf of California, Mexico: Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 179 p.Google Scholar
Rutzler, K. 1975, The role of burrowing sponges in bioerosion. Oecologia, 19: 203216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, J., and Torunski, H. 1983. Biokarst on limestone coasts, morphogenesis and sediment production. Marine Ecology, 4: 4563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoffin, T. P., Stearn, C.W., Boucher, D., Frydl, P., Hawkins, C.M., Hunter, I.G., and MacGeachy, J.K. 1980. Calcium carbonate budget of a fringing reef on the west coast of Barbados. Bulletin of Marine Science, 30: 475508.Google Scholar
Stearley, R. F., and Ekdale, A.A. 1986. Effects of periodic burial and exhumation by storms on endolithic communities, northern Gulf of California (abstract). American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 70: 651.Google Scholar
Torunski, H., 1979, Biological erosion and its significancefor the morphogenesis of limestone coasts and for nearshore sedimentation (northern Adriatic). Senckenbergiana Maritima, 11: 193265.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1927, Formation of calcareous tubes around the siphons of Teredo . Nature, 119: 1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar