Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T19:23:29.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population Structure of Live and Dead Gastropods from Bahia la Choya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Patricia M. Hartshorne ,
William B. Gillespie  and
Karl W. Flessa
Patricia M. Hartshorne
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
William B. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Karl W. Flessa
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Get access

Abstract

Size-frequency distributions and size-survivorship curves were constructed for the following seven species of living gastropods from Bahia la Choya: Cerithideamazatlanica, Cerithideaalbonodosa, Cerithiumstercusmuscarum, Nassariusiodes, Nassariusbrunneostoma, Theodoxusluteofasciatus and Tegularugosa. Size-frequency distributions and size-survivorship curves of empty shells of Cerithideamazatlanica and Cerithiumstercusmuscarum were constructed to evaluate the effects of taphonomic processes on survivorship curves.

All size-survivorship curves are convex-up in shape: small size classes show low mortality and mortality increases with increasing size. Despite post-mortem processes, survivorship curves for empty shells mimic the shape of curves based on live individuals.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 2: Paleoecology and Taphonomy of Pleistocene to Recent Intertidal Deposits, Gulf of California , 1987 , pp. 139 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Boucot, A.J. 1953. Life and death assemblages among fossils. American Journal of Science, 251: 25–40.Google Scholar
Cerrato, R.M. 1980. Demographic analysis of bivalve populations. in Rhoads, D.C. and Lutz, R.A., eds., Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms. Plenum, New York, pp. 417–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, G.Y. and Hallam, A. 1963. Size-frequency and growth-ring analyses of Mytilus edulis and Cardium edule, and their palaeoecological significance. Palaeontology 6: 731–750.Google Scholar
Dodd, J.R. and Stanton, R.J. Jr. 1981. Paleoecology, Concepts and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 557 p.Google Scholar
Fagerstrom, J.A. 1964. Fossil communities in paleoecology: their recognition and significance. Geological Society of America Bulletin 75: 1197–1216.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1967. The interpretation of size-frequency distributions in molluscan death assemblages. Palaeontology 10: 25–42.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1972. Models involving population dynamics. in Schopf, T.J.M., ed., Models in Paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp. 62–80.Google Scholar
Levinton, J.S. and Bambach, R.K. 1970. Some ecological aspects of bivalve mortality patterns. American Journal of Science, 268: 97–112.Google Scholar
Meldahl, K.M. 1987. Sedimentologic and taphonomic implications of biogenic stratification. Palaios, in press.Google Scholar
Richards, R.P. and Bambach, R.K. 1975. Population dynamics of some Paleozoic brachiopods and their paleoecological significance. Journal of Paleontology, 49: 775–798.Google Scholar