Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T20:17:18.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Anatomy of Siphonophora rosarum, Walk., the “Green-fly” pest of the Rose-tree

Part I. The Apterous Viviparous Stage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. J. Grove
Affiliation:
Research Scholar, Zoological Laboratory, University of Birmingham.

Extract

When beginning this investigation it was my intention to make a comparison between the anatomy of the apterous viviparous form and that of the winged viviparous form, to ascertain what differences were present corresponding with the difference in habit of the Aphis in these two stages. I found, however, that the literature bearing on the group to which S. rosarum belongs, was somewhat scanty, and as a rule, rather out of date. It therefore became necessary, before undertaking the comparative work, to obtain a somewhat more complete account of the general anatomy. It is with this idea in view that the following paper has been written; but, as will be seen on perusing it, much more attention has been given to the internal anatomy than to the external parts. It is my intention, now that this first part of the task is completed, to take up my original project. I desire to take this opportunity of expressing my gratitude to Professor Bridge, Mr A. E. Shipley, F.R.S., Mr Doncaster and Mr Collinge for the valuable assistance and advice they have given me whilst this work has been in progress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

Buckton, G. B. (18751882). A Monograph of British Aphides. Ray Society publication.Google Scholar
Drefus, L. (1894). Zu J. Krassilstschik's Mitteilhungen über “die vergleichende Anatomie und Systematik der Phytophthires” mit besonderer Bezugnahme auf die Phylloxeriden. Zool. Anz. xvii. pp. 205208, 221–235, 237–242, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Dufour, Léon (1833). Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur les Hemiptères.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flögel, J. H. L. (1904). Monographie der Johannisbeern Blattlaus. Aphis ribis. Allg. Zeitschr. Ent. ix. pp. 321333, 375–381.Google Scholar
Flögel, J. H. L. (1905). Monographie der Johannisbeern Blattlaus. Aphis ribis. (Continuation and Conclusion.) Zeitschr. Insbiol. i. pp. 4963, etc.Google Scholar
Krassilstschik, J. (1892). Zur Anatomie der Phytophthires. Zool. Anz. xv. pp. 217–203. (Summary in Journ. Roy. Microscop. Soc., 1892, p. 781.)Google Scholar
Krassilstschik, J. (1893). Zur Anatomie und Histologie der Phylloxera. Horae ent. Ross. xxvii. pp. 137, pls. i–ii.Google Scholar
Krassilstschik, J. (1893). Zur vergleichenden Anatomie und Systematik der Phytophthires. Zool. Anz. xvi. pp. 8592 and 97–102.Google Scholar
Mark, E. L. (1877). Beiträge zur Anatomie und Histologie der Pflanzenläuse insbesondere der Cocciden. Arch. f. mikroskop. Anat. Bd. xiii.Google Scholar
Mayer, P. (18741875). Zur Anatomie von Pyrrhocoris. Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1874, p. 313; 1875, p. 309.Google Scholar
Mordwilko, A. (1895). Zur Anatomie der Pflanzläuse. Zool. Anz. xviii. pp. 345364, 402.Google Scholar
Mordwilko, A. (1896). [Summary of paper by this author on the Anatomy of Trama and Lachnus.] Zool. Centralbl. iv. pp. 7275.Google Scholar
Vickery, R. A. (1908). A Comparative Study of the External Anatomy of Plant Lice. Twelfth Report of State Entomologist of Minnesota, p. 178.Google Scholar
Witlaczil, E. (1882). Zur Anatomie der Aphiden. Arbeit a. d. Zool. Inst. Wien, Vol. iv. p. 397. 3 plates.Google Scholar
Witlaczil, E. (1886). Zur Morphologie und Anatomie der Cocciden. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. xliii. pp. 139174, pl. v.Google Scholar