Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T08:30:51.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

B-chromosomes: germ-line parasites which induce changes in host recombination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. Bell  and
A. Burt
G. Bell
Affiliation:
Biology Department, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Dr Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1
A. Burt
Affiliation:
Biology Department, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Dr Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The object of this paper is to suggest that there may be an unexpected connexion between parasites and the evolution of sex, using for illustration an unfamiliar type of parasite, the selfish chromosome. The major intellectual challenge of sexuality is to an environment which is continually getting worse. The elegant solution given by the Red Queen theory (Levin, 1975; Hamilton, 1980; Bell, 1982; Bell & Maynard Smith, 1988) is that the relevant aspect of the environment is provided by antagonists—pathogens, predators and competitors—which, because they can respond adaptively so as to negate any improvement that has been made, provide a constant stimulus for continued evolution. Sexuality and recombination are favoured because some of the new combinations of genes which they create are resistant to the current population of antagonists. In other respects, sex and recombination are probably highly disadvantageous: outcrossed sex is expensive because it halves the rate of transmission of genes, while recombination breaks up successful combinations of genes. It is only in certain circumstances that the necessity for continual counter-adaptation will overcome these disadvantages: in particular, the damage (reduction in fitness) caused by an antagonist must be substantial, and the amount of damage must depend on a genetic interaction between the antagonistic species. These requirements are often satisfied by host—parasite systems, where both the ecological and genetic interactions between the antagonists may be very severe and highly specific (see reviews by Day, 1974 and Burdon, 1987). It is possible, therefore, that sex and recombination are maintained in natural populations largely through the dynamics of the coevolution of hosts and their parasites. This is certainly compatible with the major ecological patterns shown by sexual systems, with outcrossed sex being more common in the sea than in freshwater, more common at low than at high latitudes, and generally more common in stable, complex, climax environments where interactions between species are expected to be more frequent and intense (Bell, 1982). However, there is as yet no evidence which conclusively supports a direct causal link between the incidence of parasitism and the rate of recombination. In particular, it has never been demonstrated that a particular parasite has the effect of eliciting, directly or indirectly, a greater rate of genetic recombination in its host. We suggest that such a parasite exists; both the parasite and its effects are well known, but have never been interpreted in the context of the evolution of recombination through host—parasite coevolution. It is in many respects a rather unusual parasite. We shall argue that B-chromosomes represent highly evolved parasitic DNA, transmitted through the germ line and often eliciting greater rates of recombination in the host genome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 100 , Issue S1: Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology Volume 27:The evolutionary biology of parasitism , June 1990 , pp. S19 - S26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayonoadu, U. & Rees, H. (1968). The influence of B-chromosomes on chiasma frequencies in Black Mexican sweet corn. Genetica 39, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaglia, E. (1964). Cytogenetics of B-chromosomes. Caryologia 17, 245–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. (1982). The Masterpiece of Nature. London: Croom Helm; Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bell, G. & Smith, Maynard J. (1988). Short-term selection for recombination among mutually antagonistic species. Nature, London 327, 66–8.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. D. (1972). Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 181, 109–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Burdon, J. J. (1987). Diseases and Plant Population Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Camacho, J. P. M., Carballo, A. R. & Cabrero, J. (1980). The B-chromosome system of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans subsp. plorans (Charpentier). Chromosoma 16, 548–78.Google Scholar
Carlson, W. R. (1969). Factors affecting preferential fertilization in maize. Genetics 62, 543–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, W. R. (1973). A procedure for localizing genetic factors controlling mitotic nondisjunction in the B chromosome of maize. Chromosoma 42, 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T. (1985). The Evolution of Genome Size. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chang, C. C. & Kikudome, G. Y. (1974). The interaction of knobs and B-chromosomes of maize in determining the level of recombination. Genetics 77, 45–54.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, B. (1978). Model for the evolution of Y-chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 75, 5618–22.Google Scholar
Darlington, C. D. (1939). The Evolution of Genetic Systems. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Day, P. R. (1974). Genetics of Host-Parasite Interaction. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Evans, G. M., Rees, H., Snell, C. L. & Sun, S. (1972). The relationship between nuclear DNA amount and the duration of the mitotic cycle. Chromosomes Today 3, 24–31.Google Scholar
Fontana, P. G. & Vickery, V. R. (1975). The B-chromosome system of Tettigidea lateralis (Say). II. New karyomorphs, patterns of pycnosity and Giemsabanding. Chromosoma 50, 371–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. M. (1990). Supernumerary chromosomes: origins and evolution. In Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution (ed. Green, D. M. & Sessions, S. K.). London: Academic Press. (In the Press).Google Scholar
Gregg, P. C., Webb, G. C. & Adena, M. A. (1984). The dynamics of B-chromosomes in populations of the Australian plague locust, Chortoicetes terminifera (Walker). Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 26, 194–208.Google Scholar
Håkansson, A. (1948). Behaviour of accessory rye chromosomes in the embryo-sac. Hereditas 34, 35–59.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1980). Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35, 282–90.Google Scholar
Hanson, G. P. (1969). B-chromosome-stimulated crossing-over in maize. Genetics 63, 601–9.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, N. (1934). A cytological study on 8-chromosome rye. Caryologia 6, 68–77.Google Scholar
Henriques-Gil, N., Santos, J. L. & Giraldez, R. (1982). B-chromosome polymorphism and interchromosomal chiasma interference in Eyprepocnemis plorans (Acrididae: Orthoptera). Chromosoma 85, 349–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, G. M. (1972). The structure and role of B-chromosomes in the mottled grasshopper. Chromosomes Today 3, 208–22.Google Scholar
Hewitt, G. M. (1973). Evolution and maintenance of β-chromosomes. Chromosomes Today 4, 351–69.Google Scholar
Hewitt, G. M. (1976). Meiotic drive for B-chromosomes in the primary oocytes of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Chromosoma 56, 381–91.Google Scholar
Hewitt, G. M. & East, T. M. (1978). Effects of B-chromosomes on development in grasshopper embryos. Heredity 41, 347–56.Google Scholar
Hewitt, G. M. & John, B. (1967). The B-chromosome system of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Thunb.). III. The statistics. Chromosoma 21, 140–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, B. & Freeman, M. (1975). The cytogenetic structure of Tasmanian populations of Phaulacridium vittatum. Chromosoma 53, 283–93.Google Scholar
John, B. & Hewitt, G. M. (1965). The B-chromosome system of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Thunb.). II. The statics. Chromosoma 17, 121–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R. N. (1975). B chromosome systems in flowering plants and animal species. International Review of Cytology 40, 1–100.Google Scholar
Jones, R. N. (1985). Are B-chromosomes ‘selfish’? In The Evolution of Genome Size (ed. Cavalier-Smith, T.), pp. 397–425. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jones, R. N. & Rees, H. (1967). Genotypic behaviour of chromosome behaviour in rye. XI. The influence of B-chromosomes on meiosis. Heredity 22, 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. N. & Rees, H. (1982). B-Chromosomes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karp, A. (1981). The genetic control of meiosis in Lolium perenne. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales. (Not seen; cited by Jones, 1985.)Google Scholar
Kayano, H. (1971). Accumulation of B-chromosomes in the germ line of Locusta migratoria. Heredity 27, 119–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishikawa, H. (1965). Cytogenetic studies of B-chromosomes in rye, Secale cereale L. in Japan. Agricultural Bulletin of Saga University 21, 1–81.Google Scholar
Levin, D. A. (1975). Pest pressure and recombination systems in plants. American Naturalist 109, 437–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. B. & Jones, R. N. (1983). Dynamics of the B-chromosome polymorphism in rye. I. Simulated populations. Heredity 48, 347–71.Google Scholar
Smith, Maynard J. (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melander, Y. (1950). Accessory chromosomes in animals, especially in Polycelis tenuis. Hereditas 36, 19–38.Google Scholar
Moss, J. P. (1966). The adaptive significance of B-chromosomes in rye. Chromosomes Today 1, 15–23.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1964). The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutation Research 1, 2–9.Google Scholar
Muntzing, A. (1943). Genetical effects of duplicated fragment chromosomes in rye. Hereditas 29, 91–112.Google Scholar
Muntzing, A. (1949). Accessory chromosomes in Secale and Poa. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Genetics, Stockholm 1948, pp. 402–11.Google Scholar
Muntzing, A. (1954). Cytogenetics of accessory chromosomes (B chromosomes). Caryologia Suppl. 6, 282–301.Google Scholar
Nur, U. & Brett, B. L. H. (1985). Genotypes suppressing meiotic drive of a B-chromosome in the mealybug, Pseudococcus obscurus. Genetics 110, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nur, U. & Brett, B. L. H. (1987). Control of meiotic drive of B-chromosomes in the mealybug, Pseudococcus affinis (obscurus). Genetics 115, 499–510.Google Scholar
Nur, U., Werren, J. H., Eickbush, D. G., Burke, W. D. & Eickbush, T. H. (1988). A ‘selfish’ B-chromosome that enhances its transmission by eliminating the paternal genome. Science 240, 512–14.Google Scholar
Östergren, G. (1945). Parasitic nature of extra fragment chromosomes. Botaniska Notiser 2, 157–63. (Not seen: cited by Jones & Rees, 1982.)Google Scholar
Parker, G. S., Taylor, S. & Ainsworth, C. C. (1982). The B-chromosome system of Hypochoeris maculata. III. Variation in B-chromosome transmission rates. Chromosoma 85, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph, L. F. (1928). Types of supernumerary chromosomes in maize. Anatomical Record 41, 102.Google Scholar
Rees, H. & Ayonoadu, U. (1973). B-chromosome selection in rye. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 43, 162–6.Google Scholar
Rees, H. & Hutchinson, J. (1973). Nuclear DNA variation due to B-chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbour Symposia in Quantitative Biology 38, 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutishauser, A. & Röthlisberger, E. (1966). Boosting mechanism of B-chromosomes in Crepis capillaris. Chromosomes Today 1, 28–30.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. W. & Hewitt, G. M. (1985). The genetic control of meiotic drive acting on the B-chromosome of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Heredity 54, 187–94.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. W., Hewitt, G. M. & Anderson, D. A. (1985). Polymorphism in the rates of meiotic drive acting on the B-chromosome of Myrmeleotettix maculatus. Heredity 55, 61–8.Google Scholar
Vosa, C. G. & Barlow, P. W. (1972). Meiosis and B-chromosomes in Listera ovata (Orchidaceae). Caryologia 25, 1–8.Google Scholar
Westerman, M. & Dempsey, J. (1977). Population cytology of the genus Phaulacridium. VI. Seasonal changes in the frequency of the B-chromosome in a population of P. vittatum. Australian Journal of Biological Science 30, 329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, P. (1970). Genetical effects of B-chromosomes in Lolium. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales. (Not seen; cited by Jones & Rees, 1982.)Google Scholar
Zarchi, Y., Hillel, J. & Simchen, G. (1974). Supernumerary chromosomes and chiasma distribution in Triticum speltoides. Heredity 33, 173–80.Google Scholar
Zecevic, L. & Paunovic, D. (1969). The effect of B-chromosomes on chiasma frequency in wild populations of rye. Chromosoma 27, 198–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar