Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:01:16.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The life-cycle of Eimeria cernae Levine and Ivens, 1965 in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. C. Lewis  and
S. J. Ball
D. C. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, North East London Polytechnic, Romford Road, London E15 4LZ
S. J. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, North East London Polytechnic, Romford Road, London E15 4LZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eimeria cernae is recorded for the first time in England and the life-cycle is described in experimentally infected bank-voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). The pre-patent period was 6 days and the patent period was 4–6 days. Oocysts were ellipsoidal in shape and measured 20·2 × 15·9 μm. Sporocysts, measuring 11·5 μm long and 6·8 μm wide, possessed a small stieda body and contained a mass of granular sporocyst residuum. The endogenous stages developed in the epithelial cells of the colon and rectum. Three generations of schizonts were found. The lst-generation schizont seen at 48 h post-infection (p.i.) contained up to 8 merozoites, the 2nd-generation schizont seen at 72 h p.i. had a mean number of 16 (12–20) merozoites and the 3rd-generation schizont at 96 h p.i. had a mean of 18 (14–21) merozoites. Gamogonic stages were present from 96 to 120 h p.i. in the rectum only.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , December 1982 , pp. 443 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Černá, Ž. (1962). Contribution to the knowledge of coccidia parasitic in Muridae. Věstnik Československé Společnosti Zoologické 26, 1–13.Google Scholar
Elton, C., Foed, E. B., Baker, J. R. & Gardner, A. D. (1931). The health and parasites of a wild mouse population. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1931, 657–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golemansky, V. & Yankova, P. (1973). Studies on the species composition and occurrence of coccidia (Sporozoa, Coccidia) in some small mammals in Bulgaria. Bulletin de I'lnstitut de Zoologie et Musée 37, 5–31.Google Scholar
Humphrey, D. C. & Pittman, F. E. (1974). A simple methylene blue, azure II, basic fuchsin stain for epoxy-embedded tissue sections. Stain Technology 49, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, N. D. & Ivens, V. (1965). The Coccidian Parasites (Protozoa, Sporozoa) of Rodents. (Illinois Biological Monographs 33). Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D. (1975). Eimeria falciformis (Eimer, 1870) in specific pathogen free and gnotobiotic mice. Parasitology 71, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ring, M. (1959). Studies on the parasitic protozoa of wild mice from Berkshire with a description of a new species of Trichomonas. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 132, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryšavý, B. (1957). Poznámky k fauně kokcidií volně žijících drobných ssavců v Československu. Ceskoslovenska parasitologic 4, 331–6.Google Scholar
Todd, K. S. jr.Hammond, D. M. & Anderson, L. C. (1968). Observations on the life-cycle of Eimeria bilamellata Henry, 1932 in the Uinta ground squirrel, Spermophilus armatus. Journal of Protozoology 15, 732–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vos, A. J. (1970). Studies on the host range of Eimeria chinchillae de Vos and Van der Westhuizen, 1968. Onderspoort Journal of Veterinary Research 37, 29–36.Google Scholar
Yakimoff, W. L. & Gousseff, W. F. (1938). The coccidia of mice (Mus musculus). Parasitology 30, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar