Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T11:10:09.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticercosis: comparison of the response of Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia hydatigena and T. ovis to control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

M. A. Gemmell
Affiliation:
Hydatid Research Unit, Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, University of Otago Medical School, P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
J. R. Lawson
Affiliation:
Hydatid Research Unit, Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, University of Otago Medical School, P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
M. G. Roberts
Affiliation:
Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Private Bag, Upper Hutt, New Zealand
B. R. Kerin
Affiliation:
Hydatid Research Unit, Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, University of Otago Medical School, P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
C. J. Mason
Affiliation:
Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Private Bag, Upper Hutt, New Zealand

Summary

A comparative study has been made of the progress in the control of ovine echinococcosis caused by Echinococcus granulosus and the ovine cysticercoses caused by Taenia hydatigena and T. ovis in New Zealand. The methods of control included an educational and a dog-dosing programme. In the Styx field trial, the Otago/Southland Surveillance Programme and the national control programme, E. granulosus declined towards extinction. In contrast, this same control effort transformed the cysticercoses from hyper-endemic to endemic status with focal epidemics. In this unstable state, the density-dependent constraint was negligible and superinfection occurred.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acha, P. N. & Aguilar, F. J. (1964). Studies on cysticercosis in Central America and Panama. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 13, 4853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1982). Population Biology of Infectious Diseases. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1985). Herd immunity to helminth infection and implications for parasite control. Nature, London 315, 492–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friis, A. L., Sayers, E. G. & McLean, J. W. (1967). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Hydatids Eradication. Wellington, New Zealand: R. E. Owen, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Froyd, G. (1960). Cysticercosis and hydatid disease of cattle in Kenya. Journal of Parasitology 46, 491–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froyd, G. (1964). The artificial oral infection of cattle with Taenia saginata. Research in Veterinary Science 5, 434–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1958). Cestode problems of domestic animals and man in the South Island of New Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal 57, 442–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Gemmell, M. A. (1968). The Styx field trial. A study on the application of control measures against hydatid disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 39, 73100.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1972). Hydatidosis and cysticercosis. 2. Distribution of Cysticercus ovis in sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 46, 22–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1973). Hydatid disease in New Zealand. The first hundred years (18731972). In Recent Advances in Hydatid Disease (ed. Brown, R. W., Salisbury, J. R. and White, W. E.), pp. 5461. Hamilton, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1978 a). Perspectives on options for hydatidosis and cysticercosis control. Veterinary Medical Review No. 1, 348.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1978 b). The Styx field-trial. Effect of treatment of the definitive host for tapeworms on larval forms in the intermediate host. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 56, 433–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Gemmell, M. A. & Johnstone, P. D. (1977). Experimental epidemiology of hydatidosis and cysticercosis. Advances in Parasitology 15, 311–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gemmell, M. A. & Johnstone, P. D. (1981 a). Cestodes. In Antiparasitic Chemotherapy (ed. H., Schonfeld). Antibiotics and Chemotherapy 30, 54114.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. & Johnstone, P. D. (1981 b). Factors regulating tapeworm populations: estimations of the duration of acquired immunity by sheep to Taenia hydatigena. Research in Veterinary Science 30, 53–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gemmell, M. A. & Lawson, J. R. (1981 a). Ovine cysticercosis: an epidemiological model for the cysticercoses. 1. The free-living egg phase. In Cysticercosis: Present State of Knowledge and Perspectives (ed. A., Flisser, K., Willms, Laclette, J. P., C., Larralde, C., Ridaura and F., Beltran), pp. 8798. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. & Lawson, J. R. (1981 b). Ovine cysticercosis: an epidemiological model for the cysticercoses. 2. Host immunity and regulation of the parasite population. In Cysticercosis: Present State of Knowledge and Perspectives (ed. A., Flisser, K., Willms, Laclette, J. P., C., Larralde, C., Ridaura and F., Beltran), pp. 647–60. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. & Lawson, J. R. (1986). Epidemiology and control of hydatid disease. In The Biology of Echinococcus and Hydatid Disease (ed. Thompson, R. C. A.), pp. 189216. London, Boston and Sydney: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A., Lawson, J. R. & Roberts, M. G. (1986 a). Populations dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticercosis: biological parameters of Echinococcus granulosus in dogs and sheep. Parasitology 92, 599620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gemmell, M. A., Lawson, J. R. & Roberts, M. G. (1986 b). Population dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticercosis: evaluation of the biological parameters of Taenia hydatigena and T. ovis and comparisons with those of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology, (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, J. R. & Gemmell, M. A. (1983). Hydatidosis and cysticercosis: the dynamics of transmission. Advances in Parasitology 22, 261308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNab, J. D. & Robertson, T. G. (1972). Cysticercus ovis survey: summary of three years results. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 20, 66–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Hydatids Council. Annual Reports (19611984). Published by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, Z. S. (1981). Epidemiology and prevention of Taenia saginata infection. In Cysticercosis: Present State of Knowledge and Perspectives (ed. A., Flisser, K., Willms, Laclette, J. P., C., Larralde, C., Ridaura and F., Beltran), pp. 6985. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, Z. & Schultz, M. G. (1972). Taeniasis and cysticercosis (Taenia saginata). Advances in Parasitology 10, 269343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, M. G., Lawson, J. R. & Gemmell, M. A. (1986 a). Population dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticercosis: mathematical model of the life cycle of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology 92, 621–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, M. G., Lawson, J. R. & Gemmell, M. A. (1986 b). Population dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticercosis: mathematical model of the life cycles of Taenia hydatigena and T. ovis. Parasitology, (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweatman, G. K. (1962). The importance of the New Zealand campaign against Echinococcus granulosus and Taenia hydatigena on the prevalence of Taenia ovis. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 10, 93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urquhart, G. M. (1961). Epizootiological and experimental studies on bovine cysticercosis in East Africa. Journal of Parasitology 47, 857–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1981). Guidelines for Surveillance, Prevention and Control of Echinococcosis/Hydatidosis (ed. J., Eckert, Gemmell, M. A., Z., Matyas and Soulsby, E. J. L.), pp. 1147. Geneva: VPH/81.28. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1983). Guidelines for Surveillance, Prevention and Control of Taeniasis/Cysticercosis (ed. Gemmell, M. A., Z., Matyas, Z., Pawlowski and Soulsby, E. J. L.), pp. 1207. Geneva: VPH/83/49. World Health Organization.Google Scholar