Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T18:37:37.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population studies on the infective stage of some nematode parasites of sheep

II. The distribution of faecal deposits on fields grazed by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. D. Donald
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol
R. T. Leslie
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Mathematical Statistics, Alpha House, Newtown, N.S.W., Australia

Extract

Observations have been made on the distribution of faecal deposits on a number of small fields of varying size stocked with varying numbers of sheep. These studies were undertaken to examine certain hypotheses proposed in the construction of mathematical models for the distribution of strongyloid nematode infective larvae in pastures grazed by sheep.

The negative binomial distribution was found to provide a reasonable empirical description of the distribution of faeces, although there was evidence of departure from the negative binomial on the largest field.

Although, tentatively, the distributions were additive with respect to the number of sheep, there was evidence of departure from additivity in respect of field area and time. The implications of these findings for the model are discussed.

Significant positive correlations were found between successive time intervals in the number of faecal deposits present in individual subplots of the majority of fields. It is suggested that these arise from the tendency of sheep to use the same portion of a field for resting and rumination when heavy concentrations of faeces are deposited. The effects of this and other possible patterns of grazing and faecal deposition are discussed in relation to the intake of strongyloid infective larvae.

The average number of discrete deposits of faeces on pasture produced per sheep per day was greater in flocks producing faeces in pellet form than in flocks producing soft faecal masses. However, within faeces types, there was evidence that the expected number of deposits produced per sheep per day could reasonably be assumed constant.

The greater part of this work was carried out while one of us (A.D.D.) was the holder of a C.S.I.R.O. Overseas Research Studentship. For his advice and constructive criticism I am much indebted to Dr H. D. Crofton, under whose supervision this study was undertaken. My thanks go also to Professor J. E. Harris, C.B.E., F.R.S., for the provision of facilities in the Department of Zoology, and to Professor T. K. Ewer and Mr M. R. McCrea for their willing co-operation in the provision and handling of pastures and sheep at the School of Veterinary Science, Langford.

Mr David Culpin and Mrs Jean Williams, of the Division of Mathematical Statistics, were responsible for programming and organizing the calculations on the CDC 3200 Computer, and were consistently helpful in proposing and criticizing tests and procedures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anscombe, F. J. (1948). The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative binomial data. Biometrika 35, 246–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, F. J. (1950). Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distributions. Biometrika 37, 358–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bliss, C. I. & Fisher, R. A. (1953). Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data, and note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9, 176200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1952). The ecology of immature phases of trichostrongyle nematodes. IV. Larval populations on lowland pastures. Parasitology 42, 7784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crofton, H. D. (1954). The ecology of the immature phases of trichostrongyle parasites. V. The estimation of pasture infestation. Parasitology 44, 313–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crofton, H. C. (1958). Nematode parasite populations in sheep on lowland farms. VI. Sheep behaviour and nematode infections. Parasitology 48, 251–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinaburg, A. G. (1944). The survival of the infective larvae of the common ruminant stomach worm Haemonchus contortus on outdoor grass plots. Am. J. vet. Res. 5, 32–7.Google Scholar
Donald, A. D. (1967). Population studies on the infective stage of some nematode parasites of sheep. I. The frequency distribution of stronglyoid infective larvae in random samples of pasture. Parasitology 57, 263–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furman, D. P. (1944). Effects of environment upon the free-living stages of Ostertagia circumcincta (Stadelmann) Trichostrongylidae. I. Laboratory experiments. Am. J. vet. Res. 5, 7986.Google Scholar
Hilder, E. J. (1966). Distribution of excreta by sheep at pasture. Proc. X. Int. Grassld Congr. pp. 977–81.Google Scholar
Petersen, R. G., Lucas, H. L. & Woodhouse, W. W. Jr (1956). The distribution of excreta by freely grazing cattle and its effect on pasture fertility: I. Excretal distribution. Agron. J. 48, 440–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J. H. (1963). Observations on the free-living stages of the stomach worm Haemonchus contortus. Parasitology 53, 469–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallis, G. M. & Donald, A. D. (1964). Models for the distribution on pasture of infective larvae of the gastrointestinal nematode parasites of sheep. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 17, 504–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, J. H. (1966). The environmental biology of a nematode. In Biology of Parasites, pp. 185–96. Ed. Soulsby, E. J. L.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar