Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:32:59.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparasitic Moults in Nippostrongylus Muris, with Remarks on the Structure of the Cuticula of Trichostrongyles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

John T. Lucker
John T. Lucker
Affiliation:
Zoological Division, Bureau of Animal Industry, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rhabditiform first-stage larvae of Nippostrongylus muris are about 270–550μ long. The development of these larvae culminates in a moult, which occurred 36–48 hours after cultures were prepared. The first moult is preceded by an unusually early separation of the first cuticle, which is fine and unstriated, from the body tissue in the tail region and, later, by the formation of an underlying new cuticle, which is thicker and prominently striated.

Early second-stage rhabditiform larvae differ in certain morphological respects from first-stage larvae. Second-stage larvae are about 470–750μ long.

A second preparasitic ecdysis occurs and the infective larva is a true third-stage larva. This moult was the only one previously known to occur during the preparasitic development of N. muris.

The post-cervical cuticular inflation in N. muris is regarded, on the basis of a comparative study of the cuticle of this species and of Haemonchus contortus and other trichostrongyles, as resulting from the separation of the second and third layers of the cuticle. Yokogawa's view that Nippostrongylus muris has two cuticulae is rejected. N. muris has a single cuticula, apparently made up of four layers.

N. muris undergoes four complete moults and the development of this species does not differ in any essential respect from that reported for other strongyles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1936 , pp. 161 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dikmans, G. (1935). New nematodes of the genus Longistriata in rodents. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 25, 72–81.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1905). The anatomy and life history of Agchylostoma duodenale Dub. A Monograph. Part. I. The anatomy of the adult worm. Egypt. Min. Educ. Rec. School Med., 3, 1–158.Google Scholar
Krull, W. H. (1934). Egg albumen as a mounting medium in the study of living helminths. Proc. Helm. Soc. Wash. 1, 5–6.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. & Alicata, J. E. (1934). The development of the trichostrongyle, Nippostrongylus muris, in rats following ingestion of larvae. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 24, 334–8.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. & Alicata, J. E. (1935). Life history of Longistriata musculi, a nematode parasitic in mice. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 25, 128–146.Google Scholar
Veglia, F. (1916). The anatomy and life-history of the Haemonchus contortus (Rud.). Reprinted from 3rd and 4th Rep. Dir. Vet. Research. Dept. Agric. Onderstepoort, Pretoria, Union South Africa, pp. 349–500 (1915).Google Scholar
Yokogawa, S. (1922). The development of Heligmosomum muris Yokogawa, a nematode from the intestine of the wild rat. Parasitology, 14, 127–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar