Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T02:15:23.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on populations of head-lice (Pediculus humanus capitis: Anoplura). II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. A. Buxton
P. A. Buxton
Affiliation:
Professar of Medical Entomology, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The material which is discussed in the present paper consists of more than 2000 crops of hair collected from Sokoto, Nigeria; Nairobi and Kakamega, Kenya; Colombo, Ceylon; and Jerusalem, Palestine. The amount of material examined is considerable, but it must be admitted that it has not been found possible to obtain an unselected sample representative of any human community as a whole.

2. The paper gives detailed information about the prevalence of head-lice in respect of the individual's race, sex, age, weight of crop of hair and the season of the year.

3. The following general conclusions may be drawn:

(a) The distribution of lice among a population of people is skew. Among infested persons the commonest count is always low (generally 1–10 lice), but occasional counts of many hundreds or a few thousands are recorded.

(b) If the people are grouped by age, sex, etc. a positive correlation is generally found between the proportion of men in each group who are infested and the mean number of lice per infested person.

(c) There is clear evidence from several places that season affects the frequency of infestation. In most but not all places the insect is most widely distributed in the colder, wetter part of the year. It is not known whether this is due to some effect of climate upon the insect itself or upon human habits and activity.

(d) It will doubtless be found that the individual's race is an important factor in determining infestation, but little has yet been established on this subject.

(e) Wherever material has been available from individuals of widely different age, it has been found that boys are more infested than youths, who in turn are more infested than grown men.

(f) In some places females are more frequently infested than males, though it was established that there was no difference between the sexes at Kakamega.

(g) The weight of the individual's crop of hair is in most places positively correlated with infestation.

4. Many of the factors mentioned in 3 (d)–(g) are local and depend on racial customs. It is emphasized that further investigations would be most profitably carried out in the countries concerned by men well acquainted with the local people and their ways.

5. There are probably a large number of individual differences due to sensitiveness, vanity, general health, etc.; these have hardly been studied at present but it is probable that collectively they are very important.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1938 , pp. 85 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buxton, P. A. (1920). Body-lice under summer conditions in Mesopotamia. Parasitology, 12, 173–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1936). Studies on populations of head-lice (Pediculus humanus capitis: Anoplura). I. Parasitology 28, 92–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1937). The numbers of males and females in natural populations of head-lice (Pediculus: Anoplura). Proc. ent. Soc. Lond. 12, 12–14.Google Scholar
Cragg, F. W. (1922). Relapsing fever in the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh. Indian J. med. Res. 10, 78–189.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F. (1935). Contributions toward a monograph of the sucking-lice. Pt. 8. Stanford Univ. Publ., Biol. Sci. 2, No. 8.Google Scholar
Greenough, F. B. (1887). Clinical notes on Pediculosis. Boston med. surg. J. 117, 469–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamer, W. H. (1909). Nuisance from flies and the seasonal prevalence of vermin in common lodging-houses. Rep. of the P.H. Committee of the L.C.C., Appendix 4, pp. 2–9.Google Scholar
Hase, A. (1915). Weitere Beobachtungen über die Läuseplage. Zbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, 77, 153–63.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (1917). The biology of Pediculus humanus . Parasitology, 10, 80–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, A. D. (1916). The louse problem at the Western Front. J. R. Army med. Cps. 27, 31–60.Google Scholar
Robertson, R. C. (1932). Relapsing fever in Shanghai (1st report). Chin. med. J. 46, 853–85.Google Scholar
Sobel, J. (1913). Pediculosis capitis among school-children. N.Y. med. J. 98, 656–64.Google Scholar
Strong, R. P. and others (1918). Trench fever. Report of Commission, Medical Research Committee American Red Cross. (Oxford.)Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1937). The use of logarithms in the interpretation of certain entomological problems. Ann. appl. Biol. 24, 404–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar