Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T15:57:03.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the Eugregarines of the grass-grub [larva of Costelytra zealandica (White), Melolonthinae], with a description of three new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

F. R. Allison
F. R. Allison
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three new species of eugregarine are described from the mid-gut of the larva of Costelytra zealandica (White).

2. Euspora zealandica occurs in the anterior region of the mid-gut near the gut caeca. Slictospora costelytrae occurs just posteriorly to E. zealandica. Euspora sp. occurs posteriorly to the malpighian tubules, but was found only rarely.

3. A description of the species and the life-cycle of two species are given.

4. The life-cycle of S. costelytrae takes about 8 weeks and that of E. zealandica 6 weeks.

5. Gametocysts will develop only at a humidity of 95–100 %.

6. The bi-associative species, E. zealandica, is more abundant in the 1st and 2nd instars than the large species, S. costelytrae. Both species are equally abundant in the 3rd instars, but the peak for incidence was in May for E. zealandica and June for S. costelytrae. This is related to the longer period of time taken for the life-history of S. costelytrae.

7. The incidence of gregarines builds up in each instar to over 90% then falls off, the time of fall off corresponding with the production of gametocysts which pass out with the faeces of the grub.

8. The gregarines mostly complete their cycle before the instars moult. This is borne out by the observation that cysts were not found in the smallest size group of each instar. There were many cases in the larger size group of all three instars where cysts only occurred.

9. Gametocysts are produced mainly in the autumn.

10. Gregarines were not found in grubs approaching metamorphosis (prepupae) nor in pupae nor adults.

11. It seems unlikely from the results that the gregarines have an adverse effect on the grubs as, in general, it was found that the larger grubs had the greater number of gregarines present, but further work on this is needed.

12. The life-history of the gregarines is closely correlated with the life-history of the beetle.

13. The presence of the gregarines only in the larval stages is related to the different habitat and behaviour of larva and adult.

I am grateful to the University Grants Committee for financial support.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , August 1969 , pp. 663 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allegre, C. F. (1948). Contributions to the life history of a gregarine parasitic in grasshoppers. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 67, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beams, H. W.et al. (1959). Studies on the fine structure of a gregarine. J. Protozool. 6, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, E. V. (1956). A new Eugregarine of locusts, Gregarina garnhami n.sp., parasitic in Schistocerca gregaria Forsk. J. Protozool. 3, 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, M. M. (1959). Systematic position of some genera and classification of the suborder Cephalina Delage & Hérouard. Proc. zool. Soc. (Calcutta) 12 (2), 31–81.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S. (1966). The dispersal of Cephalobellus costelytrae, a nematode in the grass grub. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. 9 (3), 534–7.Google Scholar
Grassé, P. P. (1953). Traité de Zoologie, Tome 1, Fascicule ii. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (1962). 44th edition. Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Harry, O. G. (1967). The effect of a Eugregarine Gregarina polymorpha (Hammerschmidt) on the mealworm larva of Tenebrio molitor (L). J. Protozool. 14 (4), 539–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoy, J. M. & Given, B. B. (1952). A revision of the Melolonthinae of New Zealand. Bull. N.Z. Dep. scient. ind. Res. 102, 1–172.Google Scholar
Kelsey, J. M. (1951). Grass grub and grass caterpillar control. Bull. Dep. Agric. N.Z. no. 244.Google Scholar
Lupo, V. (1949). Studio morphologico, anatomico e istologico della Anomala ausonia var. neapolitana Reitt. Boll. del R Lab. Ent. agr. di Portici, 9, 78–110.Google Scholar
Nowlin, N. (1922). Correlation of the life cycle of a parasite with the metamorphosis of its host. J. Parasit. 8, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, V. (1941). Studies on Gregarina blattarum with particular reference to the chromosome cycle. Illinois biol. Monogr. 18, 2.Google Scholar
Sumner, R. (1933). Influence of gregarines on growth in the mealworm. Science, N. Y. 78, 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, R. (1936). Relation of gregarines to growth and longevity in the mealworm Tenebrio molitor. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 29, 645–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. P. (1965). A note on the life-cycle of Eugregarines inhabiting the alimentary canal of Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) Lepidoptera: Torticidae. N.Z. Entomologist 3 (4): 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, M. E. (1916). Studies on Gregarines, including descriptions of twenty-one new spp. and a synopsis of the eugregarine records from the Myriapoda, Coleoptera and Orthoptera of the world. Illinois biol. Monogr. 2, no. 3, 258.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1953). The Principles of Insect Physiology. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar