Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-11T10:25:49.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental sodium regulates cutaneous sugar transport in a digenean fluke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. L. Uglem
G. L. Uglem
Affiliation:
Physiology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 40506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Glucose uptake was examined in adult specimens of Proterometra macrostoma (Trematoda: Digenea) recovered from the stomach (endoparasites) and gills (ectoparasites) of longear sunfish, Lepomis megalotis. The endoparasitic forms transported glucose directly through the external body surface by Na+-independent, facilitated diffusion, but the ectoparasites absorbed glucose by free diffusion alone. To determine how this transport function is regulated, cercariae were incubated in solutions having Na+ concentrations normally found in fish gut (50 mM) and in fresh water (0·5 mM). Glucose transport capacity was retained in 50 mM Na+, but disappeared in worms incubated for 1–3 days in 0·5 min Na+. Returning worms from the latter solution to one containing 50 mM Na+ fully restored glucose transport within a day. By contrast, incubation up to 5 days in 0·5 mM Na+ had no effect on glucose transport in endoparasitic adults of P. macrostoma and cercariae of P. edneyi. Thus, cutaneous sugar transport function in the migrating larva of P. macrostoma is subject to indirect regulation by environmental Na+.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. G. & Anderson, F. M. (1963). Life history of Proterometra dickermani Anderson, 1962. Journal of Parasitology 49, 275–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dogiel, V. A. (1962). General Parasitology. Translation from Russian of the 3rd Edition published by Leningrad Press. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Epel, D. (1972). Activation of a Na+-dependent amino acid transport system upon fertilization of sea urchin eggs. Cell Research 72, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomme, J. (1982). Epidermal nutrient absorption in marine invertebrates: A comparative analysis. American Zoologist 22, 691–708.Google Scholar
Horsfall, M. W. (1933). Development of Cercaria macrostoma Faust into Proterometra (nov. gen.) macrostoma. Science 78, 175–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neame, K. D. & Richards, T. G. (1972). Elementary Kinetics of Membrane Carrier Transport. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Read, C. P. (1970). Parasitism and Symbiology. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Read, C. P. (1972). Animal Parasitism. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Richter, H. P., Jung, D. & Passow, H. (1984). Regulatory changes of membrane transport and ouabain binding during progesterone-induced maturation of Xenopus oocytes. Journal of Membrane Biology 79, 203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, G. C. (1964). Uptake of organic material by aquatic invertebrates. III. Uptake of glycine by brackish-water annelids. Biological Bulletin 126, 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uglem, G. L. (1980). Sugar transport by larval and adult Proterometra macrostoma in relation to environmental factors. Journal of Parasitology 66, 748–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uglem, G. L. & Aliff, J. V. (1984). Proterometra edneyi n. sp. (Digenea: Azygiidae): Behavior and distribution of acetylcholinesterase in cercariae. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 103, 383–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uglem, G. L., Lewis, M. C. & Larson, O. R. (1985). Niche segregation and sugar transport capacity of the tegument in digenean flukes. Parasitology 91, 121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar