Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T03:03:53.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory studies with clones of Eimeria hungaryensis, a parasite of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. Higgs
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading RG6 2AJ, Berks.
F. Nowell
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading RG6 2AJ, Berks.

Summary

Doses from 1 to 10 sporulated oocysts of a cloned strain of Eimeria hungaryensis were used to infect laboratory-reared, coccidia-free wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Total oocyst production, reproductive indices (output/dose) and daily patterns of oocyst production were compared. At doses of 10 oocysts or less, observed yields exceeded expected yields calculated using details of endogenous stages. At doses above 10 oocysts, the converse occurred. From infections initiated with 10 oocysts, total outputs were not significantly different in male and female wood mice, host age had no apparent effect and repeated infections, at 10-day intervals, of both sexes, resulted in progressive decreases in output at each successive infection, suggesting development of resistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ankrom, R., Chobotar, B. & Ernst, J. V. (1975). The life cycle of Eimeria ferrisi Levine and Ivens, 1965 in the mouse Mus musculus. Journal of Protozoology 22, 317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagburn, B. L., Adams, J. H. & Todd, K. S. (1982). First asexual generation of Eimeria vermiformis Ernst, Chobotar and Hammond, 1971 in Mus musculus. Journal of Protozoology 68, 1178–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Brackett, S. & Blitznick, A. (1952). The reproductive potential of five species of coccidia of the chicken as demonstrated by oocyst production. Journal of Parasitology 38, 133–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Černá, Ž. (1962). Contribution to the knowledge of coccidia parasitic in Muridae. Vestnik Ceskoslovakie Spolecnosti Zoologicke 26, 113.Google Scholar
Fengming, G. & Hanying, J. (1982). Studies on kinetics on the intestinal epithelium in mice by autoradiography. Acta Zoologica Sinica 28, 19. (In Japanese with English summary.)Google Scholar
Hall, P. R. (1935). The relation of the size of infective dose to number of oocysts eliminated, duration of infection, and immunity in Eimeria miyairii. Ohira infections in the white rat. Iowa State College Journal of Science 9, 115–24.Google Scholar
Higgs, S. (1985). A study of coccidia infecting Apodemus sylvaticus and other small mammals. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Higgs, S., Nowell, F. & Ibrahim, S. (1988). The initiation and maintenance of a colony of coccidiafree wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Laboratory Animals 22, 5460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kheysin, Y. M. (1972). Life Cycles of Coccidia of Domestic Animals (ed. Todd, K. S.). London: William Heinemann Medical Books.Google Scholar
Levine, N. D. & Ivens, V. (1965). The coccidian parasites (Protozoa, Sporozoa) of rodents. Illinois Biological Monograph 33. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. C. (1981). Studies on coccidian parasites of British wild rodents. M.Phil. thesis, Polytechnic of North East London.Google Scholar
Long, P. L. (1973). Pathology and pathogenicity of coccidial infections. In The Coccidia: Eimeria, Isospora, Toxoplasma and Related Genera (ed. Hammond, D. M. and Long, P. L.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Mesfin, G. M. & Bellamy, J. E. C. (1979). Effects of acquired resistance on infection with Eimeria falciformis var. pragensis in mice. Infection and Immunity 23, 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, C. C., Catchpole, J. & Joyner, L. P. (1979). Redescriptions of Eimeria irresidua Kessell and Jankiewicz, 1931 and E. flavescens Marotel and Guilhon, 1941 from the domestic rabbit. Parasitology 79, 231–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellerdy, L. (1954). Zur Kenntnis der Coccidien aus Apodemus flavicollis. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 4, 186–91.Google Scholar
Potten, C. S. & Loeffler, M. (1987). A comprehensive model of the crypts of the small intestine of the mouse provides insight into the mechanisms of cell migration and the proliferation hierarchy. Journal of Theoretical Biology 127, 381–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, H. (1960). Studies on the coccidia of some rodents of the families Muridae, Dipodidae and Cricetidae. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 54, 321–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roudabush, R. L. (1937). The endogenous phases of the life cycle of Eimeria nieschulzi, Eimeria separata and Eimeria miyairii, coccidian parasites of the rat. Iowa State College Journal of Science 11, 135–63.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. (1975). Why and how are coccidia harmful to their host? In Pathogenic Processes in Parasitic Infections. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, vol. 13 (ed. Taylor, A. E. R. and Muller, R.), pp. 4358. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1978). The effects of single versus multiple high and low immunising doses of the development and duration of resistance to Eimeria ferrisï in Mus musculus. M.Sc. thesis, Andrews University, Michigan.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1978). Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Tilahun, G. & Stockdale, P. H. G. (1981). Oocyst production of four species of murine coccidia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59, 1976–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, K. S. Jr & Lepp, D. L. (1971). The life cycle of Eimeria vermiformis Ernst, Chobotar and Hammond, 1971 in the mouse Mus musculus. Journal of Protozoology 18, 332–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed