Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:31:17.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nematode parasite populations in sheep on lowland farms IV. The effects of anthelmintic treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. D. Crofton
H. D. Crofton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last twenty-five years, since it was realized that the control of flock infections was more important than the treatment of individuals with patent infections, there has been an increasing interest in the use of anthelmintic drugs. As might be expected there has been a wide search for the most effective chemicals and considerable research into the best methods of administration, and as a consequence of this many workers have been engaged in devising methods of testing the efficiency of various compounds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 48 , Issue 3-4 , November 1958 , pp. 235 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, A. E. & Trim, A. R. (1946). The biological activity of phenolic compounds. The effect of surface active substances upon the penetration of hexyl resorcinol into Ascaris lumbricoides var. suis. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 133, 220–34.Google Scholar
Baldwin, E. (1943). An in vitro method for the chemotherapeutic investigation of anthelmintic potency. Parasitology, 35, 89–111.Google Scholar
Chance, M. R. A. & Mansour, T. E. (1949). A kymographic study of the action of drugs on the liver fluke. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 4, 7–13.Google Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1955). Nematode parasite populations in sheep on lowland farms. II. Worm egg counts in lambs. Parasitology, 45, 99–115.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. (1939). Anthelmintic efficiency against immature Haemonchus contortus. Aust. Vet. J. 15, 57–66.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. (1940). The anthelmintic efficiency of phenothiazine against immature Haemonchus contortus. J. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. 13, 245–6.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. (1943). The anthelmintic efficiency of phenothiazine against immature Trichostrongylus spp. in sheep. J. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. 16, 1–4.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. (1945). Phenothiazine as an anthelmintic. Aust. Vet. J. 21, 90–95.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. (1948). The epidemiology of parasitic diseases with special reference to studies with nematode parasites of sheep. Aust. Vet. J. 24, 17–45.Google Scholar
Krotov, A. I. (1953). (A study of the therapy of ascaridosis. A first communication on a method of studying the reactions of Ascaris in anthelmintic preparations in vitro.) Med. Parasit., Moscow, 22, 387–95.Google Scholar
Krotov, A. I. (1956). (Data on the physiology of the motor responses of Ascaris.) Med. Parasit., Moscow, 25, 58–60.Google Scholar
Leiper, J. W. G. (1952). The testing of anthelmintics with particular reference to the development of new agents. Vet. Rec. 64, 438–9.Google Scholar
Mackie, A. & Parnell, I. W. (1955). A comparison of the results of four in vitro anthelmintic testing techniques. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 7, 416–20.Google Scholar
Parnell, I. W. (1936). Studies on the bionomics and control of the bursate nematodes of horses and sheep. II. Technique. Canad. J. Res. (Sect. D), 14 71–81.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., Leiper, J. W. G. & Clapham, P. A. (1941). A phenothiazine experiment statistically treated. J. Helminth. 19, 9–24.Google Scholar
Trim, A. R. (1944). Experiments on the mode of action of hexyl-resorcinol as an anthelmintic. Parasitology, 35, 209–19.Google Scholar
Trim, A. R. (1949). The kinetics of the penetration of some representative anthelmintics and related compounds into Ascaris lumbricoides var. suis. Parasitology, 39, 281–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitlock, J. H. (1943). Characteristics of the population available for bioassay of anthelmintics in Nippostrongylus muris infection in albino rats. J. Parasit. 29, 42–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, J. H. (1955). Trichostrongylidosis in sheep and cattle. Proc. Book, Amer. Vet. Med. Ass., 92nd Annual Meeting 1955, pp. 123–31.Google Scholar
Whitlock, J. H. & Bliss, C. I. (1943). A bio-assay technique for anthelmintics. J. Parasit. 29, 48–58.Google Scholar