Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T12:33:01.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on Entamoeba gingivalis from the Human Mouth, with a Note on the Trichomonad Flagellate Tetratrichomonas buccalis n. sp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

T. Goodey  and
A. W. Wellings
T. Goodey
Affiliation:
Protozoologist, Research Laboratory in Agricultural Zoology, University of Birmingham
A. W. Wellings
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Dental Histology and Pathology, University of Birmingham.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The claim made for the first time by Barrett and Smith (1914a) some two years and a half ago, that the causative agent of Pyorrhoea Alveolaris is the Entamoeba gingivalis led the writers to enquire into the question; the results of which enquiry are set forth in the following paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , July 1917 , pp. 537 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1917

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, M. T. (1914 a). The Protozoa of the Mouth in relation to Pyorrhea Alveolaris. Dental Cosmos, LVI. 948.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. T. (1914 b). Clinical Report on Amoebic Pyorrhea. Dental Cosmos. 1345.Google Scholar
Bass, C. C., and Johns, F. M. (XI. 1914). The cause and cure of Pyorrhea Alveolaris. New Orleans Med. and Surg. Journ.Google Scholar
Bass, C. C., and Johns, F. M. (1915). Alveodental Pyorrhea. Philadelphia and London. (Reviewed in Dental Cosmos, LVII. 1299.)Google Scholar
Bensen, W. (1910). Untersuchungen über Trichomanas intestinalis und vaginalis des Menschen. Arch. f. Protist. XVIII. 115.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E. (1913). Précis de Parasitologie. Paris.Google Scholar
Chiavaro, A. (1914). Researches upon Endamoeba bucealis. (Abstract in Dental Cosmos, LVI. 1089.)Google Scholar
Colyer, J. F. (1916). Chronic General Periodontitis “Periodontal Disease” (Pyorrhoea Alveolaris). London.Google Scholar
Craig, C. F. (1916). Observations on the Endamoebae of the Mouth. 1. Endamoeba gingivalis (buccalis). Journ. of Infect. Diseases, XVIII. 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1909). The Intestinal Protozoa of Frogs and Toads. Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. N. S. LIII. 201.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1911). Lehrbuch der Protozoenkunde. Jena.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M. (1912). Untersuchungen über parasitische Amöben. II. Entamoeba tetragena. Arch. f. Protist. xxiv.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M. (1913). “Morphologie und Systematik der Amöben” in Kolle und Wassermann, Handbuch der pathogenen Mikroorganismen. Jena.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M., and Withmore, E. (1912). Untersuchungen über parasitische Amöben. III. Entamoeba coli. Arch. f. Protist. xxiv.Google Scholar
Jollos, V. (1913). “Darmflagellaten des Mensehen,” in Kolle und Wassermann, Handbuch der pathogenen Mikroorganismen. Jena.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A., and Swezy, O. (1915). Mitosis and multiple fission in trichomonad Flagellates. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Science, LI. 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczynski, M. (1914). Untersuchungen an Trichomonaden. Arch. f. Protist. XXXIII. 109–199.Google Scholar
Leyden, E. Von and Loewenthal, W. (1905). Entamoeba buccalis (Prow.) bei einem Fall von Carcinom des Mundbodens. Charité Annalen, XXIX. 9.Google Scholar
Lynch, K. M. (1915). Concerning Endamebiasis of the Mouth. Amer. Journ. of Trap. Dis. and Prev. Med. III. 231.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1913). Studies on Parasitic Protozoa (2) B. Tetratrichomastix parisii n. subgen. and n. sp. Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. LIX. 459.Google Scholar
Mendel, J. (1916). Recherches sur les amibes dans la pyorrhée alvéolaire et sur les autres stomatopathies. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XXX. 286.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. A. (1912). An Introduction to the Study of Protozoa. London.Google Scholar
Parisi, B. (1910). Su alcuni flagellati endoparassiti. Arch. f. Protist. XIX. 232.Google Scholar
Price, W. A. (1916). The Dental Aspect of the Relation of Endamoeba to Pyorrhea Alveolaris. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, XXII. No. 1.Google Scholar
Prowazek, S. Von (1904). Entamoeba buccalis. Arb. a. d. Kais. Gesundheitsamte, XXI. 42.Google Scholar
Sanford, A. H., and New, G. B. (1916). The Relation of Amoebiasis to Pyorrhea Alveolaris. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, XXII. No. 1.Google Scholar
Smirnow, M. R. (1915). A Note on the Etiology of Pyorrhea Alveolaris. Dental Cosmos, LVII. 1010.Google Scholar
Smith, A. J., and Barrett, M. T. (1915 a). Emetin in the Treatment of Peridental Suppurations. Dental Cosmos, LVII. 1201.Google Scholar
Smith, A. J., and Barrett, M. T. (1915 b). The parasite of Oral Endamebiasis Endamoeba gingivalis (Gros). Journ. of Parasitology (U.S.A.), I. 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidenreich, F. (1908). Über Speichelkörperchen. Ein Übergang von Lymphocyten in neutrophile Leucocyten. Folia Haematol. v. 1.Google Scholar
Weidenreich, F. (1911). “Die Leucocyten und verwandte Zellformen” (Die Speichelkorperchen, p. 672), in Ergebnisse der Anat. und Entwicklungsgeschichte. Merkel und Bonnet 19. 1909.Google Scholar