Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T17:07:29.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The plerocercoid of Gilquinia squali Fabricius, 1794

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2015

K. MacKenzie*
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen

Extract

Unidentified helminth larvae in the eyes of the North Sea whiting, Gadus merlangus L., were recorded in an unpublished survey of parasites of gadoid fish by Dr Z. Kabata of the Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen, in 1957. Since then these larvae have been observed frequently and during the first 6 months of 1964 an effort was made to identify them. They proved to be the plerocercoids ofa trypanorhynch cestode.

The plerocercoids are usually free in the aqueous or vitreous humour, but occasionally one is found attached to the lens. Very often both eyes of the same fish are infested, the largest number of larvae recorded from one eye being ten, from a fish taken in Shetland waters. The other eye of the same fish contained eight larvae.

In several plerocercoids examined the proboscides were evaginated, thus enabling detailed drawings to be made of the armature at a magnification of × 900. A number of specimens were fixed in Gilson's fixative; transverse and longitudinal sections were cut and stained with Mallory's triple stain; whole mounts were stained with borax carmine.

Early larval stages are completely undifferentiated; they develop, later, to the stage shown in Fig. 1. A plerocercoid with a fully developed scolex measures 3·5–8·0 mm long by 0·7–1·6 mm broad.

The larva is composed mainly of faintly staining tissue resembling the parenchyma of adult cestodes. The scolex is withdrawn into a cavity, the receptaculum scolecis, in the anterior half of the plerocercoid. At the anterior extremity is a deep invagination from which, in early larval stages, the receptaculum scolecis begins to develop.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dollfus, R. Ph. (1942). Études critiques sur les tétrarhynques du Muséum de Paris. Archs Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris, 19, 1466.Google Scholar
Ekbaum, E. K. (1933). Citharichthys stigmaeus as a possible intermediate host of Gilquinia squali (Fabricius). Contr. Can. Biol., Fish., N.S., 8, 99100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (1954). The food of the whiting, and a comparison with that of the haddock. Mar. Res. 1954, no. 2, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. (1891). Anatomische Studien über skandinavische Cestoden. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 24, 1109.Google Scholar
Pintner, T. (1933). Zur Kenntnis des Exkretionssystems der Cestoden. Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Abt. 1, 142, 205–11.Google Scholar
Ruszkowski, J. S. (1934). Études sur le cycle évolutif et la structure des cestodes de mer. III. Le cycle évolutif du tétrarhynque Grillotia erinacea (van Ben., 1858). Mém. Acad. pol. Sci., Sér. B, no. 6, pp. 19.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. (1932). The Cestoda of Canadian fishes. 1. The Pacific coast region. Contr. Can. Biol. Fish., N.S., 7, 221–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerny, H. (1912). Beitrag zur Kenntnis des anatomischen Baues von Rhynchobothrius tetrabothrius v. Ben. Arb. zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, 19, 297316.Google Scholar
Zhukov, E. V. (1960). Endoparasitic worms of the fishes in the sea of Japan and South-Kuril shallow waters. (Russian text.) Trudȳ zool. Inst., Leningr. 28, 1146.Google Scholar