Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-31T02:21:07.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A discussion of Stephen Macedo Just Married: Same-Sex Couples, Monogamy & the Future of Marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2016

Joseph J. Fischel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, in Obergefell v. Hodges, that the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution forbids legal discrimination against same-sex marriage. The decision sent shock waves throughout the country, with both supporters and opponents regarding it as signal of dramatic shifts in public opinion and a revolutionary development on the road to sex-gender equality. Just two days earlier, on June 24, 2015, Stephen Macedo’s Just Married: Same-Sex Couples, Monogamy, and the Future of Marriage was published. Macedo has always worked at the intersection of legal theory, normative theory, and public policy, and Just Married offers a nuanced liberal democratic defense of marriage equality with striking resonance in light of Obergefell. We have thus invited a range of scholars on LGBT rights, and LGBT politics more generally, to comment on his book.

Type
Review Symposium: Just Married
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 795 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aloni, Erez. 2013. “Registering Relationships.” Tulane Law Review 87(3): 573–648.Google Scholar
Den Otter, Ronald C. 2015. In Defense of Plural Marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggan, Lisa. 2002. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Fischel, Joseph J. 2014. “Bigger Love? Same-Sex Marriage and the Poly Problem.” The Bilerico Project, September 18. http://www.bilerico.com/2014/09/bigger_love_same-sex_marriage_and_the_poly_problem.php.Google Scholar
Fischel, Joseph J. 2016a. “A More Promiscuous Politics: LGBT Rights without the LGBT Rights.” In After Marriage Equality: The Future of LGBT Rights, ed. Ball, Carlos A.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fischel, Joseph J. 2016b. Review of In Defense of Plural Marriage, by Den Otter, Ronald C.. The Journal of Politics 78(1): e1–e4.Google Scholar
Franke, Katherine. 2015. Wedlocked: The Perils of Marriage Equality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle S. 1993. “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.” In The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, eds. Abelove, Henry, Barale, Michèle Aina, and Halperin, David M.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saletan, William. 2015. “The Case against Polygamy.” Slate, June 29. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/06/is_polygamy_next_after_gay_marriage_chief_justice_roberts_obergefell_dissent.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sheff, Elisabeth. 2014. The Polyamorists Next Door: Inside Multiple-Partner Relationships and Families. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Young, Cathy. 2015. “Polygamy Is Not Next.” Time, June 30. http://time.com/3942139/polygamy-is-not-next/.Google Scholar