Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T17:43:24.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Retreat of the West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2020

Peter Trubowitz Open the ORCID record for Peter Trubowitz [Opens in a new window]  and
Brian Burgoon Open the ORCID record for Brian Burgoon [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The West is turning inward. Donald Trump’s presidency, Britain’s decision to leave the European Union, and the spread of populist parties in Europe are the most visible signs of this retreat. The shift is not as recent as these examples suggest, however. Drawing on an array of cross-national data for twenty-four industrialized democracies and hundreds of political parties in those democracies, we show that domestic support for liberal internationalism has been receding for twenty-five years across the West. We show that since the end of the Cold War a large and widening gap has opened up between Western democracies’ international ambitions and their domestic political capacity to support them. As Western governments came to rely increasingly on economic globalization, institutionalized cooperation, and multilateral governance, mainstream parties that backed these efforts lost electoral ground to parties on the radical-left and increasingly, the anti-globalist radical-right that have been the vehicles of the current backlash. We discuss the implications of these trends for the Western liberal international order and the strategies now on offer to repair it.

Type
Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 102 - 122
Copyright
© American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A list of permanent links to Supplemental Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

*

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X0LYXD

For helpful comments they are indebted to Michael Bernhard, Catherine Boone, Peter Katzenstein, Kyle Lascurettes, Alexander Trubowitz, the anonymous reviewers at Perspectives on Politics, and to seminar participants at the LSE, Hertie School of Governance, and University of Amsterdam.

References

Allison, Graham. 2020. “The New Spheres of Influence: Sharing the Globe with Other Great Powers.” Foreign Affairs 99(2): 30–40.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jeffrey, Ikenberry, G. John, and Risse, Thomas. 2008. The End of the West? Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1912. The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage. London: W. Heinemann.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, Mikhaylov, Slava, and Laver, Michael. 2009. “Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birchfield, Vicki L., Krige, John, and Young, Alasdair R.. 2017. “European Integration as a Peace Project.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(1): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloodgood, Elizabeth. 2016. “The Yearbook of International Organizations and Quantitative Non-State Actor Research.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Non-State Actors, ed. Reinalda, Bob, 31–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolleyer, Nicole. 2013. New Parties in Old Party Systems: Persistence and Decline in 17 Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. 1965. Strategy in the Missile Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2016. America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian., Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, and Tannenbaum, Eric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, and Laver, Michael. 1992. Party Policy and Government Coalitions. London: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2009. “Globalization and Backlash: Polanyi's Revenge?” Review of International Political Economy 16(2): 145–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Brian, van Noort, Sam, Rooduijn, Matthijs, and Underhill, Geoffrey. 2019. “Positional Deprivation and Support for Radical Right and Radical Left Parties.” Economic Policy 34(97): 49–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, Italoa, and Stanig, Piero. 2018. “The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 62(4): 936–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordesman, Anthony H. 2018. “NATO ‘Burden Sharing’: The Need for Strategy and Force Plans, Not Meaningless Percentage Goals.” Center for Strategic International Studies. (https://www.csis.org/analysis/nato-burden-sharing-need-strategy-and-force-plans-not-meaningless-percentage-goals).Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2017. “The Liberal Order Is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither.” Foreign Affairs 96(3): 36–44.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert. 2000. The Post-Modern State and the World Order. London: Demos.Google Scholar
De Vries, Catherine and McNamara, Kathleen R.. 2018. “The EU Needs Less Technocracy and More Democracy.” Foreign Affairs. (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2018-05-14/how-choice-can-save-europe).Google Scholar
Dorman, Andrew M., and Kaufman, Joyce P., eds. 2011. The Future of Transatlantic Relations: Perceptions, Policy, and Practice. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Axel. 2006. “Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization.” Applied Economics 38(10): 1091–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2014. The System Worked: How the World Stopped Another Great Depression. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard C., and Stoll, Richard J.. 2017. “The Acceptability of War and Support for Defense Spending: Evidence from Fourteen Democracies, 2004–2013.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(4): 788–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, Aaron. 2000. America and the Japanese Miracle: The Cold War Context of Japan’s Postwar Economic Revival, 1950–1960. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. “The End of History?” National Interest 16: 3–18.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. 2005. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gholz, Eugene, and Press, Daryl G.. 2001. “The Effects of Wars on Neutral Countries: Why It Doesn’t Pay to Preserve the Peace.” Security Studies 10(4): 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gygli, Savina, Haelg, Florian, Potrafke, Niklas, and Sturm, Jan-Egbert. 2019. “The KOF Index Revisited.” Review of International Organizations 14(3): 1–32.Google Scholar
Haass, Richard N. 2017. A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Mansfield, Edward D., and Pevehouse, Jon C. W.. 2015. “Human Rights Institutions, Sovereignty Costs, and Democratization.” British Journal of Political Science 45(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Henley, Jon. 2017. “Marine Le Pen Promises Liberation from the EU with France-First Policies.” The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/05/marine-le-pen-promises-liberation-from-the-eu-with-france-first-policies).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley, 1995. “The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism.” Foreign Policy 98: 159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2018. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John, and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1(1): 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John 2009. “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order.” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John 2018. “The End of Liberal International Order?” International Affairs 94(1): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2002. “Power and Weakness.” Policy Review 113(1): 3–28.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and McGann, Anthony J.. 1997. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
KOF Swiss Economic Institute. 2019. KOF Globalization Index. (http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch).Google Scholar
Krauthammer, Charles. 1990. “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs 70(1): 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hans-Peter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon and Frey, Timotheos, eds. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A., and Trubowitz, Peter L.. 2007. “Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States.” International Security 32(2): 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2018. “International Legitimacy Lost? Rule and Resistance When America Is First.” Perspectives on Politics 16(1): 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liff, Adam P. 2015. “Japan’s Defense Policy: Abe the Evolutionary.” Washington Quarterly 38(2): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, Jennifer, and Wohlforth, William C.. 2019. “The Future of the Liberal World Order Is Conservative: AStrategy to Save the System.” Foreign Affairs 98(2): 70–80.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Tod, ed. 2005. Beyond Paradise and Power: Europe, America, and the Future of a Troubled Partnership. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, Will, Benoit, Ken, Mikhaylov, Slava, and Laver, Michael. 2011. “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1): 123–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, Edward. 2017. The Retreat of Western Liberalism. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lunderstad, Geir. 1986. “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–52.” Journal of Peace Research 23(3): 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martill, Benjamin. 2019. “Center of Gravity: Domestic Institutions and the Victory of Liberal Strategy in Cold War Europe.” Security Studies 28(1): 116–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 1999. “A Realist View: Three Images of the Coming International Order.” In International Order and the Future of World Politics, ed. Paul, T.V. and Hall, John A., 19–40. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Walter Russell. 2017. “The Jacksonian Revolt.” Foreign Affairs 96(2): 2–7.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John 2018. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen, and Judkins, Benjamin. 2004. “Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?” International Studies Quarterly 48(1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54(2): 217–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas 2009. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, Thomas. 2015. A Political Economy of American Hegemony: Buildups, Booms, and Busts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C., Nordstrom, Timothy, and Warnke, Kevin. 2004. “The Correlates of War 2 International Governmental Organizations Dataset Version 2.0.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 21(2): 101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 2014. Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2019. Crises of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rommel, Tobias, and Walter, Stefanie. 2018. “The Electoral Consequences of Offshoring: How the Globalization of Production Shapes Party Preferences in Multi-Party Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 51(5): 621–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooduijn, Matthjis, Burgoon, Brian, and van Elsas, Erika J.. 2017. “Radical Distinction: Radical Left and Radical Right Parties in Europe.” European Union Politics 18(4): 536–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggie, John G. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36(2): 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, Harvey M., Friedman, Benjamin H., Gholz, Eugene, and Press, Daryl G.. 2009. “Restraining Order: For Strategic Modesty.” World Affairs 172(2): 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur Jr. 1949. The Vital Center: The Politics of Freedom. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2019. “The Broken Bargain: How Nationalism Came Back.” Foreign Affairs 98(2): 54–60.Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy. 2018. The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 2018. Military Expenditures Database. (https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex).Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Peter. 2011. Politics and Strategy: Partisan Ambition and American Statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Robert W., and Hendrickson, David C.. 1990. Empire of Liberty: The Statecraft of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Urata, Shujiro. 2009. “Japan's Free Trade Agreement Strategy.” Japanese Economy 36(2): 46–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2018. The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Trubowitz and Burgoon Supplementary Materials

Trubowitz and Burgoon Supplementary Materials 1

Download Trubowitz and Burgoon Supplementary Materials(File)
File 15.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Trubowitz and Burgoon Supplementary Materials

Trubowitz and Burgoon Supplementary Materials 2

Download Trubowitz and Burgoon Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 498.2 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Trubowitz and Burgoon Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X0LYXD
Link