Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:21:11.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analogies and Models Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

T. R. Girill*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Achinstein, P.Models, Analogies, and Theories.” Philosophy of Science 31 (1964): 328350.10.1086/288018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Achinstein, P. “Approaches to the Philosophy of Science.” In The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Edited by P. Achinstein and S. Barker, pp. 259291. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.Google Scholar
[3] Achinstein, P.Models and Analogies: a Reply to Girili.” Philosophy of Science 39 (1972).10.1086/288436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Braithwaite, R. Scientific Explanation. New York: Harper, 1953.Google Scholar
[5] Carnap, R. Foundations of Logic and Mathematics (1937). Sections 24 and 25, reprinted in Philosophy of Science, edited by A. Danto and S. Morgenbesser, pp. 150158. Cleveland: World, 1960.Google Scholar
[6] Girili, T. R.Formal Models and Achinstein's ‘Analogies’.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 96104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Heimann, P. M.Maxwell, Hertz, and the Nature of Electricity.” Isis 62 (1971): 149157.Google Scholar
[8] Hempel, C. G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
[9] Hesse, M. Forces and Fields. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield-Adams, 1965.Google Scholar
[10] Kaplan, A. The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.Google Scholar
[11] Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.10.1119/1.1937571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Wilson, F. “On Achinstein's Concepts of Science.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 442452.Google Scholar