Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:44:54.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Physicalist Antireductionism Compute the Embryo?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Alex Rosenberg
Alex Rosenberg*
Affiliation:
University Of Georgia
*
†Department Of Philosophy, University Of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602-6116
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is widely held that (1) there are autonomous levels of organization above that of the macromolecule and that (2) at least sometimes macromolecular processes are best explained in terms of such autonomous kinds. I argue that molecular developmental biology honors neither of these claims, and I show that the only way they can be rendered consistent with a minimal physicalism is through the adoption of controversial claims about causation and explanation which undercut the force of these two antireductionism claims.

Type
Symposium: Emergence and Supervenience: Alternatives to Unity by Reduction
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue S4: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Dec., 1997 , 1997 , pp. S359 - S371
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kitcher, P. (1984), “1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences”, Philosophical Review 93: 335–373.10.2307/2184541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1989), “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 410–505.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. (1992), The Making of a Fly. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1993), Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1985), The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1993), Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wolpert, L. (1969), “Positional Information and the Spatial Pattern of Cellular Formation”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 25: 1–47.10.1016/S0022-5193(69)80016-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, L. (1994), “Do We Understand Development”, Science 266: 571–572.10.1126/science.7939707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed