Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Martínez Vidal, Concha
and
Úbeda Rives, José Pedro
2014.
The Life and Work of Leon Henkin.
p.
93.
Article contents
Class-Membership and the Ontological Problem
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2022
Extract
Professor Quine in recent articles has raised an old question, an ontological one, concerning the status of universals. It is interesting to note that the same positions recur in symbolic logic that have appeared so often in the past in less exact language. There can be little doubt that the question he raises is crucial; and if the issue is not yet settled, there is at least some hope that it may be clarified. Propositions are required to make propositions clear.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1950
Footnotes
∗
Read before the Philosophy Club of the University of Virginia, March 28th, 1949.
References
1 Quine, W. V., “On Universals”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 12 (1947), p. 74, and Nelson Goodman and W. V. Quine, “Steps Toward a Constructive Nominalism”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 12 (1947), p. 105.
2 Sophist, 247E.
3 An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, New York, 1940 (Norton), p. 434.
4 Quine, W. V., “On Universals”, p. 74.
5 Republic, VII.
6 Parmenides, 131A.
7 Science and the Modern World, New York, 1929 (Macmillan), Ch. X.
8 Quine, W. V., “On Universals”, p. 75.
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid.
11 Nelson Goodman and W. V. Quine, “Steps toward a Constructive Nominalism”, p. 105, n. 1.
12 Ibid., p. 105.
13 Ibid., p. 105, n. 2.
14 Science and the Modern World, New York, 1929 (Macmillan), Ch. III.
15 Nelson Goodman and W. V. Quine, “Steps toward a Constructive Nominalism”, p. 100.
16 Ibid., p. 106–7.
17 Ibid., p. 107.
18 Ibid., p. 111.
19 Ibid., p. 112.
20 Ibid., p. 112 ff.
21 C. I. Lewis and C. H. Langford, Symbolic Logic, (Century, 1932), Ch. VI and Appendix II.
- 1
- Cited by